• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Rape?

Me Myself

Back to my username
You say "do you understand" as if you think that's actually true. It isn't. It's a rape myth. Virtually all convicted sex offenders had the option of consensual sex at the time they committed the crime. So obviously they choose sexual assault for some other reason than sexual gratification.

They also had the chance to display anger and domination in a wide number of other ways :shrug:
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
Still wondering if anyone wants to touch it... my argument which heavily suggests the motivations of someone committing a rape will always include an element inherent violent, thus making all rape violent and all rapists willfully committing violence.

I agree. I wonder if there is anyone here who doesnt. So far I think we all agree rape is violence. The thing being discussed is whether or not sexual gratification is posible motivation.
 

Alceste

Vagabond
I agree. I wonder if there is anyone here who doesnt. So far I think we all agree rape is violence. The thing being discussed is whether or not sexual gratification is posible motivation.

Why do you resist accepting that domination is the motivation? If it was sexual gratification, a wank would do the job. Failing that, they could have consensual sex with a willing partner.
 

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
Why do you resist accepting that domination is the motivation? If it was sexual gratification, a wank would do the job. Failing that, they could have consensual sex with a willing partner.

I've seen it argued over and over again that it isn't just about domination, but domination plus something else that needs to be looked at and talked about.

I've argued that getting turned on is there, but it's just along for the ride of the will to dominate. It's an a supplementary position, but not what drives people to rape.

Somebody can be so turned on that what they want in sexual gratification can be to orgasm (for instance), but it takes a very distinct motivation to completely dismiss another person's consent. Domination, control, punishment, etc., or any other motivation that de-humanizes another person.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
I've seen it argued over and over again that it isn't just about domination, but domination plus something else that needs to be looked at and talked about.

I've argued that getting turned on is there, but it's just along for the ride of the will to dominate. It's an a supplementary position, but not what drives people to rape.

Somebody can be so turned on that what they want in sexual gratification can be to orgasm (for instance), but it takes a very distinct motivation to completely dismiss another person's consent. Domination, control, punishment, etc., or any other motivation that de-humanizes another person.

Empathy is a form of constraint. Motivation plus lack of constraint (empathy) equals action being performed.
 

Me Myself

Back to my username
Why do you resist accepting that domination is the motivation? If it was sexual gratification, a wank would do the job. Failing that, they could have consensual sex with a willing partner.

And if all they wanted was domination they could have just attained a position of power in their jobs or social lives that didnt involve sex.

Domination alone doesnt make an erection happen.
 

Alceste

Vagabond
And if all they wanted was domination they could have just attained a position of power in their jobs or social lives that didnt involve sex.

Domination alone doesnt make an erection happen.

They do usually use domination and aggression in many other aspects of their lives. If you are a violent and aggressive person, why NOT commit sexual aggression in addition to all the other ways you express aggression in your life?

I have this uncle. We got on fine when I was a kid, until one day he was tickling me. Kids get tickled all the time, of course, and it's a game. It's fun for everybody, and the tickler stops when they get the sense the ticklee has really had enough. Not my uncle Dave though. I had had enough, and he just kept tickling. I started to get scared, and feel helpless, and get angry, and there was this look in his eye that he knew, and he liked that. Ever since that day I considered him dangerous and untrustworthy. Years later I discovered he used to beat up his wife. (Heck, maybe he still beats her. She's Catholic, so she'll never kick him to the curb). He likes to hurt people. His kids don't like him very much, especially his daughter, and I don't really want to know what he was doing to them, but if I've met one person in my life who I sincerely believe has the capacity to be a sex offender, it's him.
 

Vinayaka

devotee
Premium Member
And if all they wanted was domination they could have just attained a position of power in their jobs or social lives that didnt involve sex.

Domination alone doesnt make an erection happen.

How do you know what happens inside a criminal perverted mind? Seeing a little kid shouldn't make an erection happen either, but apparently it does.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Yes, the connection may be subtle to some. MMA, boxing, the more violent ones probably do the most damage. I can't even watch it. It's legalised street fighting, and if you've seen someone smash a broken glass into someone else's face in a street fight, well??? I don't see a whole lot of difference between watching somebody smash their opponent's head repeatedly, to a brutal repeated rape.

Oh, Jesus Christ, give me a break! :facepalm:

Unlike "street fighting", MMA has strict rules, the athletes are well trained and matched by rank and weight class, and obviously they're willing participants. There is an expectation and standard of sportsmanship, discipline and professionalism within MMA. To compare it to rape is wholly asinine and is an insult to the sport and to the athletes. Your comments reflect upon nothing more than your own insecurity, over-sensitivity and squeamishness.
 
Last edited:

TheDude79

New Member
I certainly think that in many or most people that a lack of sex changes a person's psychology and it can also aggravate existing psychological disorders. :)
 
Last edited:

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
Well there's the disconnect, then. I don't really give a fiddler's fart exactly what is going through the mind of any individual perpetrator of any violent assault at the exact moment of the crime.

Ah, that is the disconnect then. I think the more we understand about something, the more we're able to analyze it and enact possible solutions. This is especially true of human behavior.

All the argumentative fallacies and rhetorical devices in the world won't alter this fundamental view, so I suppose we're at an impasse.
 

MysticSang'ha

Big Squishy Hugger
Premium Member
Ah, that is the disconnect then. I think the more we understand about something, the more we're able to analyze it and enact possible solutions. This is especially true of human behavior.

All the argumentative fallacies and rhetorical devices in the world won't alter this fundamental view, so I suppose we're at an impasse.

Personally, I see the psychological profile as important. But the disconnect is whether or not criminal profiling of rapists includes if somebody is turned on or is seeking sexual gratification, IMO.
 

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
Personally, I see the psychological profile as important. But the disconnect is whether or not criminal profiling of rapists includes if somebody is turned on or is seeking sexual gratification, IMO.

That's certainly been a disconnect from the start, and a point that we'll all have to agree to disagree on.
 
Top