• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Reincarnation - Scripture or imagination?

Shiranui117

Pronounced Shee-ra-noo-ee
Premium Member
Hi Shiranui, there are many reincarnatist which believe they remember what happened in past lives. Just go to Allan Cronshaw's site. Allan claims he was "Jesus'" brother James, and also claims he was Thomas Paine. And gives great detail as to what he did in those lives. So as far as those who say they remember, then they should be getting better. KB
So those of us who don't remember any of our past lives are screwed by comparison?

EDIT: But yeah, I'll check that out. Plus, IDK about Allan, but I think that if I were James, one of the Apostles, I wouldn't be needing to reincarnate anymore. I'd say being a faithful and true disciple of Christ in the flesh, living out His teachings and doing good to others, and helping to spread His Church, would basically be the most good I could do on earth.
 
Last edited:

nazz

Doubting Thomas
So those of us who don't remember any of our past lives are screwed by comparison?

EDIT: But yeah, I'll check that out. Plus, IDK about Allan, but I think that if I were James, one of the Apostles, I wouldn't be needing to reincarnate anymore. I'd say being a faithful and true disciple of Christ in the flesh, living out His teachings and doing good to others, and helping to spread His Church, would basically be the most good I could do on earth.

you might return as a bodhisattva
 

JayJayDee

Avid JW Bible Student
The "afterlife" is not quite what most people imagine.
I know all the denominations and people's arrogance have screwed the gospel very badly. But since you mentioned. What is your idea of afterlife?

Thank you for asking. :)

Platonic immortal souls aside, when you consider that the Hebrew scriptures teach only about resurrection, we first have to know what the Jews understood resurrection to be.

Heb 11:17-19 gives us some insight.

"By faith Abraham, when he was tested, as good as offered up Isaac, and the man that had gladly received the promises attempted to offer up [his] only-begotten [son], although it had been said to him: “What will be called ‘your seed’ will be through Isaac.” But he reckoned that God was able to raise him up even from the dead..."

Abraham knew that all the promises for the Messiah to come through his family line rested with Isaac. Yet God had asked him to sacrifice Isaac and end his life. What was Abraham's reasoning on the matter? Paul explains that Abraham's faith in the resurrection was so sure that without hesitation, he was willing to offer Isaac because he knew that God could raised back him from the dead. Now was Abraham expecting Isaac to go to heaven? Or was his expectation to have Isaac brought back to life on earth to perpetuate the family line?

Lazarus' sister Martha expressed a similar thought when Jesus told her that her brother would "rise". Was she of the belief that her brother had gone to heaven?

"Jesus said to her: “Your brother will rise.” Martha said to him: “I know he will rise in the resurrection on the last day.”
What did Martha believe the resurrection to be?

When resurrections were performed during Jesus' earthly ministry and after his death, where were people brought back to? Were they not ALL brought back to life on earth and reunited with their families? This was a demonstration of what was to come under the rule of God's kingdom.

Jesus' words in John 5:28, 29...."Do not marvel at this, because the hour is coming in which all those in the memorial tombs will hear his voice and come out, those who did good things to a resurrection of life, those who practiced vile things to a resurrection of judgment."

The dead are called from where? They are called out of their graves and given a new start. The 'judgment' for those who were classified as "unrighteous" is not to call their former sins to account, but to judge them on the life they lead after their resurrection. Why? Because "the wages sin pays is death". These have paid sins wages because the death penalty was the highest penalty there was for any crime committed under God's law.
According to Romans 6:7 "For he who has died has been acquitted from [his] sin."

Thanks to Jesus' sacrifice, those who have paid for their sin with death are now raised back to life, thanks to the ransom sacrifice of Jesus, their sin is forgiven and they will be raised and educated in Jehovah's ways.

The "second death" described in Revelation remains forever as a receptacle for any who refuse to bring their lives into harmony with Jehovah's will in the future. No rebel will again disrupt Jehovah's purpose. Like Gehenna, this is a death that has no resurrection.

The 'afterlife' has been hijacked by belief in an immortal soul...it was NOT originally a Jewish teaching but a Greek adoption gleaned from earlier Babylonian ideas. It fits perfectly with the devil's first lie....he said that the first humans could break God's law and "surely not die".....God said they would and go back to the dust...nothing more.

Since humans are not 'programmed' for death, it is only natural that they would cling to a notion that is in agreement with what is already in their hearts.....
"Even time indefinite he has put in their heart" (Eccl 3:11)

Living forever in paradise was supposed to take place here on earth. That is what most people think heaven is. But our paradise is still here. Imagine what the earth could be like if you get rid of all the polluters, wickedness, war and suffering....all caused by selfish humans.

The earth was always meant to be man's permanent home. God originally had no intention of taking humans to heaven. Adam's sin was responsible for the need of the kingdom, the redeemer, and the choosing of some to go to heaven to assist Jesus in the administration of the kingdom arrangement. These alone were to be "kings and priests" for the redeemed ones of mankind.....Adam's children. (Rev 20:6)

A thousand years of their rulership will bring everything back to square one. Rebellion in both the earthly and spiritual realms of the Most High will have been dealt with; precedents set for all eternity, and God's will again being done on earth as it was intended to be at the start. It will all go back to that. (Rev 21:1-4)

Free will is a precious gift and God has gone to a lot of trouble to see to it that it is preserved for us. He never wanted us to be robotic, but out of love, choose to obey our Father in full understanding and trust. :yes:



 

e.r.m.

Church of Christ
As a Christian the Bible fors my beliefs on reincarnation.

I believe the Bible supports the concept. Mat 17:12 but I say into you, that Elijah is come already, and they knew him not, but did unto him whatsoever they would. Even so shall the Son of man also suffer of them.
13 Then understood the disciples that he spake unto them of John the Baptist.

No, Elijah was not John the Baptist.

Hebrews 9:27 Just as man is destined to die once, and after that to face judgment,
 

jtartar

Well-Known Member
As a Christian the Bible fors my beliefs on reincarnation.

I believe the Bible supports the concept. Mat 17:12 but I say into you, that Elijah is come already, and they knew him not, but did unto him whatsoever they would. Even so shall the Son of man also suffer of them.
13 Then understood the disciples that he spake unto them of John the Baptist.

Muffled,
When Jesus was talking about John the Baptist, Jesus meant that Elijah was a prototype of John, definitely not a reincarnation of Elijah. Jesus was speaking about the prophecy recorded at Mal 4:5,6. The disciples understood what Jesus meant, Matt 17:10-13.
As for Jesus, he was not an incarnation, Jesus was a MAN, 1Tim 2:3-6, 1Cor 15:21, 47.
For Jesus to be qualified to ransom mankind Jesus had to become like men in every way, Heb 2:14-16, 4:15. Only being a man could Jesus qualify to ransom back to men what Adam had lost for us, perfect life. Jesus called himself the son of man, Matt 16:13. Because of Jesus being a man God gave him the responsibility to be the judge of men, John 5:21,22,26,27. Jesus when he came to earth was a man, made a little lower than the angels, Heb 2:5-9. Jesus was flesh and blood, Heb 5:7-9, 9:12.
The Bible tells us that when Jesus died, he died according to the flesh, but was made alive in the spirit, 1Pet 3:18, 1Cor 15:44-47.
After the death of Jesus, when he was resurrected as a spirit, Jesus did put on a fleshly body different times during the forty days that he remained on earth after his resurrection. This was the only time you could count Jesus as an incarnation, which is the puting on of a fleshly body by a spirit creature.
 

Ken Brown

Well-Known Member
A man who dies once dies as that man. He comes back as another man. Different man, same soul. Simple.

Hi Shermana, I have two daughters that are expecting their first children. Should I be concerned that Adam Lanza may be a possible grandson? KB
 

Xchristian

Active Member
In the same way that angels are addressed as God in the OT, even though they aren't actually God. Angels carry out God's mission, yet are not themselves God. ...

Shiranui, you are comparing a kilogram to a kilometer, for gossakes!


So all the wrong answers were relevant, and the correct answer is irrelevant? In what sort of classroom or academic setting would that fly? :confused:

yes irrelevant, because we are not talking who jesus is, we are talking people thought of him as the baptist, and he didn't spring up in protest.

Then why didn't the Apostles believe in, or teach, reincarnation? Why didn't their personal students teach it?

who said they didn't?

I call it resurrection full stop, because that's what they taught, that's what they were taught by Christ, and that's what they believed. You have a long row to hoe in trying to prove that the Gospels, Acts and Epistles mean "reincarnation" when they say "resurrection". An infinitely long row, in fact.

wrong dear, jesus said, (john is Elijah) .. they believed it.

No they don't. If you'd read them, in every case where resurrection is mentioned, it is always understood as being raised up in the same body in which you died. ...


does that include jesus being an old prophet?


If the Gospel writers had meant reincarnation rather than resurrection, they would have used the words for "reincarnation." It wasn't a concept for which they had no name.

changing words don't make a difference, because the concept is that of reincarnation, so why use a word to describe the obvious? they would have had to call Eleazer's sleep as death, but they didn't!

There is no "final reincarnation" in the Bible.

check Revelation please.

Alright, so you're not saying that reincarnation is true, but just saying that it was believed? Forgive me then, I think I misunderstood you. My apologies for any unpleasantness on my part! :sorry1:

that's fine

I can't speak for Herod, but I do know enough about Jesus and the Pharisees to say for sure that they didn't believe in/teach Reincarnation.

if they didn't they would have killed the guy who said this person is the one I personally beheaded, they would have impeached him ... called him a lunatic!
 

Shermana

Heretic
Hi Shermana, I have two daughters that are expecting their first children. Should I be concerned that Adam Lanza may be a possible grandson? KB

Just as much as you should be concerned that Hitler or Jeffery Dahmer may be. Who knows, maybe you got Einstein or one of the 70 original disciples or something.
 

Shermana

Heretic
Now in Ezekiel 44, how far ahead in the Future were they talking about building this particular Temple where sacred water flows out that causes trees to bear fresh fruit every month, and which Levites who went after idols is it talking about that will be appointed to be in charge of the Temple? Apparently, these were the priests of the generation before the Temple was destroyed, so was he talking about 100 year old priests or something? Oh wait, the Temple probably would take much longer than to build. So where do they fit in exactly?
‘The Levites who went far from me when Israel went astray and who wandered from me after their idols must bear the consequences of their sin. 11They may serve in my sanctuary, having charge of the gates of the temple and serving in it; they may slaughter the burnt offerings and sacrifices for the people and stand before the people and serve them. 12But because they served them in the presence of their idols and made the house of Israel fall into sin, therefore I have sworn with uplifted hand that they must bear the consequences of their sin, declares the Sovereign Lord. 13They are not to come near to serve me as priests or come near any of my holy things or my most holy offerings; they must bear the shame of their detestable practices. 14Yet I will put them in charge of the duties of the temple and all the work that is to be done in it.
 

Ken Brown

Well-Known Member
I thought being sarcastic about people's beliefs is against the rules of the forum, wouldn't you?

Hi Xchristian, you can look at it as being sarcasm, I look at it as pointing out the obvious. Now, if I believed that you would turn into a donkey, would you graciously accept my beliefs, or would you point out the obvious? KB
 

Xchristian

Active Member
Hi Xchristian, you can look at it as being sarcasm, I look at it as pointing out the obvious. Now, if I believed that you would turn into a donkey, would you graciously accept my beliefs, or would you point out the obvious? KB

I would accept it certainly, given I know well this is what you believe.

check people around 2 centuries after jesus, they believed he could fly, go through the stratosphere, onto the 3rd heaven and beyond .. infinity .. and then for some strange reason sit down on a chair next to another entity ..

that is insulting to people minds who know that a person can't go past a few miles up and then freezes over, but yet we forgive them, they didn't know better.

currently people who believe in evolution believe exactly what you said ...
that you, (and I just in case you take it as an insult) are apes that became men with evolution, ... can we take that as in insult? .. noway!

jesus thought the Elijah of the OT is the baptist, look:

[Mt 17:12][ but I tell you that Elijah has already come, and they did not recognize him, but they did to him whatever they pleased. So also the Son of Man is about to suffer at their hands."]
[Mt 17:13][ Then the disciples understood that he was speaking to them about John the Baptist.]

did they think he was looney? ... I do now because I know better
you too think jesus got this one wrong ... but you're just too embarrassed to face it.
 
Last edited:

Shiranui117

Pronounced Shee-ra-noo-ee
Premium Member
Shiranui, you are comparing a kilogram to a kilometer, for gossakes!
How so?

yes irrelevant, because we are not talking who jesus is, we are talking people thought of him as the baptist, and he didn't spring up in protest.
He did brush aside the idea, though.

who said they didn't?
Because we have their writings.

wrong dear, jesus said, (john is Elijah) .. they believed it.
But in what sense?

[/b][/i]does that include jesus being an old prophet?
I don't think I follow.

changing words don't make a difference, because the concept is that of reincarnation, so why use a word to describe the obvious? they would have had to call Eleazer's sleep as death, but they didn't!
So going by this logic, would it make any sense to say "Jimmy swam" when we REALLY meant "Jimmy ran," because it's obvious that Jimmy was running?

check Revelation please.
Alright, Revelations 20:5-6 But the rest of the dead did not live again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he who has part in the first resurrection. Over such the second death has no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with Him a thousand years.

Revelations 11:7-12:
The Witnesses Killed

7 When they finish their testimony, the beast that ascends out of the bottomless pit will make war against them, overcome them, and kill them. 8 And their dead bodies will lie in the street of the great city which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our[g] Lord was crucified. 9 Then those from the peoples, tribes, tongues, and nations will see their dead bodies three-and-a-half days, and not allow[h] their dead bodies to be put into graves. 10 And those who dwell on the earth will rejoice over them, make merry, and send gifts to one another, because these two prophets tormented those who dwell on the earth.
The Witnesses Resurrected

11 Now after the three-and-a-half days the breath of life from God entered them, and they stood on their feet, and great fear fell on those who saw them. 12 And they[i] heard a loud voice from heaven saying to them, “Come up here.” And they ascended to heaven in a cloud, and their enemies saw them.

^Now, see how resurrection here means the witnesses standing back up on their feet, in their old, formerly dead bodies?

We also have further proof that Revelations did not teach Reincarnation:
Revelations 20:11-15
11 Then I saw a great white throne and Him who sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away. And there was found no place for them. 12 And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God,[c] and books were opened. And another book was opened, which is the Book of Life. And the dead were judged according to their works, by the things which were written in the books. 13 The sea gave up the dead who were in it, and Death and Hades delivered up the dead who were in them. And they were judged, each one according to his works. 14 Then Death and Hades were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.[d] 15 And anyone not found written in the Book of Life was cast into the lake of fire.

Note how being cast into the lake of fire is only called the SECOND death?

if they didn't they would have killed the guy who said this person is the one I personally beheaded, they would have impeached him ... called him a lunatic!
Generally, killing a client king of the Roman Empire doesn't go over very well with the Emperor or his armies.

Plus, with Herod's patronage of the Temple, including massive expansions to the Temple complex, I don't think that the Pharisees were really anxious to call Herod out on anything. Also throw in the already existing sectarian divisions in Judaism that already had widely-varying beliefs, and Herod's statement was just another drop in the bucket.
 

Xchristian

Active Member

When you compare an angel becoming god ... to a human soul exchanging bodies,
that's totally different kettles of water!

there's only one god .. many angels ...
nobody ever called angels gods or gods angels ..
but reincarnation is a proven belief between various nations.


He did brush aside the idea, though.

saying I am not a certain dead person but I am another (perhaps another dead person) only means that he chose to be a different person, not that it is impossible to be the mentioned dead person.

Because we have their writings.

First:
their writings? ... are you sure that Mark, Paul, Luke .. etc are apostles writings? ...
Even the first gospel are you sure it is an apostle's writing? .. or the fourth? or any other?

second:
What we have says they DID believe in reincarnation, they believed he was talking about the baptist when he was talking about Elijah, so please memorise this:

((Elijah equals the Baptist)) --> jesus said so, disciples believe so .. you must accept it.

~(@ [ Then the disciples understood that he was speaking to them about John the Baptist.] @)~

[Mt 17:13]


But in what sense?

Elijah is an OT character, dead long before John the Baptist was born.
What sense can you deduce from that other than reincarnation?


I don't think I follow.

When they said to him that people say he is one of the old prophets ..
same thing as above ... simple, clear, in the face reincarnation.


Alright, Revelations 20:5-6 But the rest of the dead did not live again until the thousand years were finished. This is the first resurrection. Blessed and holy is he who has part in the first resurrection. Over such the second death has no power, but they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with Him a thousand years.

...

Note how being cast into the lake of fire is only called the SECOND death?

You asked if there was a final death, I said please check revelation, right?
now you came up with two deaths .. perhaps three .. the more the merrier!

Generally, killing a client king of the Roman Empire doesn't go over very well with the Emperor or his armies.

Plus, with Herod's patronage of the Temple, including massive expansions to the Temple complex, I don't think that the Pharisees were really anxious to call Herod out on anything. Also throw in the already existing sectarian divisions in Judaism that already had widely-varying beliefs, and Herod's statement was just another drop in the bucket.

Because he made no mistake, he just said what is commonly known between people of his time, ... nothing to do with anyone being ashamed, Herod's status .. etc.

I mean if Obama said I called The British premiere on the mobile .. it's understandable, mobiles are a common thing nowadays.
If Abraham Lincoln claimed the same thing, he would have been the first president of the USA to be sectioned for mental hallucination.

It's nothing to do with opinions or status.
 

davidthegreek

Active Member
Resurrection is NOT the same thing as reincarnation. Resurrection means that a person's soul returns to their body, and their old body is risen from the grave. Reincarnation means that, after a person dies, their soul is reborn as another person.

This is one of the foundational problems with supporters of Reincarnation who attempt to use the Bible (or the Qur'an for that matter) to try and prove their belief: All the Biblical references to "new life" or "being raised up to new life" clearly have to do with Resurrection, not Reincarnation.

If John the Baptist were to be reincarnated as Jesus, then John the Baptist would first have to die, and AFTER his death, THEN John the Baptist's soul would be reincarnated and REBORN as Jesus. i.e. John dies first, then Jesus is born. This is not the case; John the Baptist and Jesus lived for 30 years together on the same earth at the same time. Therefore, Jesus is not a reincarnation of John the Baptist.


ok people who thought jesus was the reincarnation of John the Baptist, were pretty irrational. Those who thought that John was the reincarnation of Elijah. Is there any proof he wasn't? Now, I am not trying to challenge the christian doctrines, as I am not sure either. But isn't there any possibility that reincarnation is indeed supported by the bible, as some claim?

note: I am talking about possibility here. Not certainty.
 

davidthegreek

Active Member
So those of us who don't remember any of our past lives are screwed by comparison?

EDIT: But yeah, I'll check that out. Plus, IDK about Allan, but I think that if I were James, one of the Apostles, I wouldn't be needing to reincarnate anymore. I'd say being a faithful and true disciple of Christ in the flesh, living out His teachings and doing good to others, and helping to spread His Church, would basically be the most good I could do on earth.
quite possible.
 

Xchristian

Active Member
trouble is that the church tradition has ironed over embarrassing theologies.

you will never see a pastor/priest/whatever talk about it.

they always say that there had to be an Elijah sent before jesus, but there wasn't so the baptist played this 'role'.

they won't say that jesus said that they are but the same person, and that the disciples believed so.

they will run over quickly to ..

[ All this took place to fulfill what had been spoken by the Lord ...:]

as if jesus had a plan for his life to fulfill a prophecy [or two] a day ...

don't bother about strange things, god has strange ways anyway.. and jesus loves you.

don't bother with the lake of fire, don't bother with the hell He prepared for thou.

[Mt 5:22][... you will be liable to the council; and if you say, "You fool,' you will be liable to the hell of fire.]

your god loves you .. in the lake of fire! .. I will never say the F(ool) word in my life, I don't want to be burnt according to the loving god
 
Last edited:
Top