You can attempt to do whatever you want. But you are just punning with polysemes.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
You can attempt to do whatever you want. But you are just punning with polysemes.
Proof? It's a pretty obvious statement.It's one of the common responses from anti-abortion religious people when discussing the financial burden of children on the poor. Especially, but not exclusively, for those who also deplore contraception. Non-religious people who are against abortion don't tend to use that one.
If you want to disbelieve me, then feel free.Proof? It's a pretty obvious statement.
We are in accord there.
Do they? We would necessarily be doing a vein to vein transfusion on the way to the hospital. Should you, the donor, be legally compelled to stay attached as long as my life is in danger? I don't think you should.
More accurate. I am not sure what you think the difference is.Let’s make this a tad more accurate. You need bone marrow. I’m a match. I consent. Actions are taken where now without me following through you will die.
You have no legal obligation to provide your bone marrow to me. You can withdraw at any point. If you wake up during the harvesting with a needle in your hip, you can withdraw then.Can I withdraw my freely given consent (not for any drastic reason, but just because I feel like or wish your death) or do I need to follow though on my commitment as your life is forgot If I change my mind?
More accurate. I am not sure what you think the difference is.
You have no legal obligation to provide your bone marrow to me. You can withdraw at any point. If you wake up during the harvesting with a needle in your hip, you can withdraw then.
You may feel that you have a moral obligation, but you do not have a legal obligation.
Are you under the impression that you can be legally obligated to provide part of your body to me?So I can agree, and then change my mind and kill you in the process?
You cannot make a legal contract to provide part of your body to another person. Such donations are always unencumbered gifts.I can't go there. I'm big on personal liberty, but one of the core valid functions of government is the enforcement of a contract.
Can I withdraw my freely given consent (not for any drastic reason, but just because I feel like
So I can agree, and then change my mind and kill you in the process?
I can't go there. I'm big on personal liberty, but one of the core valid functions of government is the enforcement of a contract.
Its one thing to decline your request, but when the line is crossed and your life hangs on my following through on my agreement its wrong to change my mind and kill you.
Follow up...So I can agree, and then change my mind and kill you in the process?
I can't go there. I'm big on personal liberty, but one of the core valid functions of government is the enforcement of a contract. Its one thing to decline your request, but when the line is crossed and your life hangs on my following through on my agreement its wrong to change my mind and kill you.
If I make that agreement and your life hinges on it it would be consistent to have the government enforce the contract. Now I doubt such a law is on the books, but the concept is well established in our code of law.Are you under the impression that you can be legally obligated to provide part of your body to me?
You cannot make a legal contract to provide part of your body to another person. Such donations are always unencumbered gifts.
Follow up...
Regarding consent...
Can a woman consent to sex, then withdraw her consent before her partner is done?
Ah I don't see how. If the person says stop and withdraws consent then the person they are with can stop having sex with them. Why wouldn't they be able to stop having sex?In theory maybe, but practically no. To allow the sudden withdrawal of consent can make anyone a rapist in a split second.
If I make that agreement and your life hinges on it it would be consistent to have the government enforce the contract.
Now I doubt such a law is on the books,
the concept is well established in our code of law.
Policy said: ↑
Follow up...
Regarding consent...
Can a woman consent to sex, then withdraw her consent before her partner is done?
In theory maybe, but practically no.
To allow the sudden withdrawal of consent can make anyone a rapist in a split second.
Just remember you are a Christian.In theory maybe, but practically no. To allow the sudden withdrawal of consent can make anyone a rapist in a split second.
Just remember you are a Christian.
I am a Satanist and for sex consent is everything. If consent is withdrawn and the other party proceeds, that person is a rapist.
No, it has more to do with the opinion a woman is supposed to be submissive, along with very dated ideas of male sexuality. You'll likely find even many women in the circles who teach such things would agree.Only a rapist would disagree with this fundamental fact.
Go to a lawyer and try to draw up a contract between you and another person for a body part. Organ. Bone marrow blood. When you get through utterly failing to get her to agree that you have a point, then we can carry on.If I make that agreement and your life hinges on it it would be consistent to have the government enforce the contract. Now I doubt such a law is on the books, but the concept is well established in our code of law.
Well, that is a little disturbing. It can make one a rapist if one lacks concern for one's partner. Sex is more than the moment of climax, you know.In theory maybe, but practically no. To allow the sudden withdrawal of consent can make anyone a rapist in a split second.