LittleNipper
Well-Known Member
Silly me, there I was thinking marriage was about love....
The culmination of love in the joining of a seed and egg to make a baby that captures the traits of both parents. Silly you. babies are all about love.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Silly me, there I was thinking marriage was about love....
The culmination of love in the joining of a seed and egg to make a baby that captures the traits of both parents. Silly you. babies are all about love.
It would still be part of the mother even if she were raped and decided to keep the child. Love knows no bounds when it comes to a mother's love.
Personally, I'm very much against working on the Sabbath... the Jewish, Christian or Muslim Sabbath. I'd quite like to have a long weekend every weekend.Why do so many people make such a big deal out of the "sin" of homosexuality, yet nobody seems to give a rat's @@@ about working on the sabbath? Since the latter is forbidden right in the ten commandments, you'd think it would be a bigger deal.
Hmm.It is interesting, how you think and spew filth in your attacks against what has been put forth by me very directly, without foul language, and actually very compationately. Marriage is about children. Homosexuality is about anything but. And when this shield is held up, not you or anyone else can deny that reality.
Honestly, there are some people who marry and never have children, but it would seem that they are in the minorty. Most at least want children.
Not so keen on adoption, are you?They want a boy like the father ---- Mommy's little man. They dream of daddy's little girl who resembles the mother.
So... adopting a child is not "the culmination of love"? Odd view, IMO.The culmination of love in the joining of a seed and egg to make a baby that captures the traits of both parents. Silly you. babies are all about love.
It would still be part of the mother even if she were raped and decided to keep the child. Love knows no bounds when it comes to a mother's love.
Marriage is primarily about companionship. Note in Genesis that God could not find a suitable companion for the man among creation. God had to create woman.Marriage is about children.
How very Freudian of you...They want a boy like the father ---- Mommy's little man. They dream of daddy's little girl who resembles the mother.
Even Tim LaHaye will tell you that sex was also designed for mutual pleasure. Marriage is about companionship.sex was designed for procreation. Marriage is about family, and not about one's preoccupations.
Eros does.Love needs no sex.
Nor does it deserve to be reduced to some badge of procreation.Marriage does not deserve to be reduced to some badge of sexual pandering.
Silly you. Sometimes babies are all about victimization and rape. The child still captures the traits of both parents, even if it's a product of violence instead of love.The culmination of love in the joining of a seed and egg to make a baby that captures the traits of both parents. Silly you. babies are all about love.
So infertile and voluntarily sterilised people can't love?The culmination of love in the joining of a seed and egg to make a baby that captures the traits of both parents. Silly you. babies are all about love.
What's wrong with you?! ::wags finger at Penguin::If marriage really was created by God for the purpose of raising children, would you mind telling God the next time you talk to him that his plan isn't running completely correctly? My wife and I (both heterosexual, married in a church, first marriage for both, meeting the whole enchilada of what I've been told God likes to see in a marriage) have been trying for kids for years and still haven't had any.
some are against homosexuals playing on the Sabbath. Imagine! Not only can they not marry, they can't even observe Sabbath now. My, aren't we a friendly lot?!I'm against homosexuals working on the Sabbath.
What you said was very clear, and it made to reference to any hypothetical future in which sexual orientation might become a protected class. You said: If I had been Gay and held protected status I would have had a case and justice would have been served!I was speaking in reference to future actions I was not clear, excuse me.
Yes, the laws were passed because of rampant discrimination against women and minorities. But every race, religion, etc., is protected. Not just women, and not just minorities.Protected Class: The groups protected from the employment discrimination by law. These groups include men and women on the basis of sex; any group which shares a common race, religion, color, or national origin; people over 40; and people with physical or mental handicaps. Every U.S. citizen is a member of some protected class, and is entitled to the benefits of EEO law. However, the EEO laws were passed to correct a history of unfavorable treatment of women and minority group members.
I know some people consider them discriminatory, but again, quotas are just a loss of privilege, and as you yourself say, they're applied in cases where there has been wanton discrimination in an attempt to restore some balance.Quota: Fixed hiring and promotion rates based on race, sex, or other protected class standards which must be met at all costs. In extreme cases, the courts have assigned quotas to some employers who have continued to practice illegal discrimination. The agency or any other employer cannot use quotas to meet their affirmative action goals unless a court orders it. Quotas are considered discriminatory against males and other non minority people.
No, you don't understand how it works. Discrimination still occurs despite the law. Every member of a minority understands that. The law doesn't make discrimination go away, and when it does it occur, you don't just file a complaint and get some bureaucrat to wave a magic wand and make it go away. Do you seriously think that's how it works for minorities? The laws give you a legal basis to work with. Proving discrimination and seeking redress for it is still a lot of work.And it plays along with this. You can say all you want to say I was there it was me and I was screwed because I don't claim to be Native American. I know what you are saying but that is not the way it really works, epically when the investigator is black.
Still piling on the bull ****.It is interesting, how you think and spew filth in your attacks against what has been put forth by me very directly, without foul language, and actually very compationately. Marriage is about children. Homosexuality is about anything but. And when this shield is held up, not you or anyone else can deny that reality.
Honestly, there are some people who marry and never have children, but it would seem that they are in the minorty. Most at least want children. They want a boy like the father ---- Mommy's little man. They dream of daddy's little girl who resembles the mother.
Any filth you see with what I have said is entirely in your head.
though none are as good at it as you.They have the right to pretend at anything they wish.
Marriage is about children.
And that is LittleNipper's worldview, and the rest of you have to abide by it, whether you like it or not. What's love got to do with it? Nothing.
Still piling on the bull ****.
One would think that your arms would get tired with all the shovelling.
Why are you so scared of that thread?
or is avoiding that thread what gives you the strength to continue shovelling the bull ****?
Personally, I'm very much against working on the Sabbath... the Jewish, Christian or Muslim Sabbath. I'd quite like to have a long weekend every weekend.
Hmm.
If marriage really was created by God for the purpose of raising children, would you mind telling God the next time you talk to him that his plan isn't running completely correctly? My wife and I (both heterosexual, married in a church, first marriage for both, meeting the whole enchilada of what I've been told God likes to see in a marriage) have been trying for kids for years and still haven't had any.
Not so keen on adoption, are you?
Personally, I'd prefer that any child I have is true to himself or herself. I don't want little clones of my wife and me.
So... adopting a child is not "the culmination of love"? Odd view, IMO.
Well, for your loveless worldview, nothing.The question is, what has homosexuality to do with marriage?
The question is, what has homosexuality to do with marriage?