• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Religion and Politics are Serious Topics

dust1n

Zindīq
This doesn't make sense. this isn't my thread. how would you ''solve the problem what problem etc. lol

adios

Um, you do realize you quoted something I said to no one in particular stating "The problem I have with this thread premise, is that it seems to give ''meaning'' to ones subjective interpretations..."

I'm not actually sure on what grounds I'm being antagonized here, but I'm happy to go.
 

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
They're not assertions, they're observations.

They're statements, hence assertions. Based on observations, perhaps, but the wording implies a certainty that I question.

Because your observations don't match up with mine.

We'll talk when chimps or dolphins create a version of Fox News or mega churches.

So, basically you're saying that politics and religion didn't exist at all until these two institutions, and all other institutions which you're referring to by extension with them?
 

Kilgore Trout

Misanthropic Humanist
They're statements, hence assertions. Based on observations, perhaps, but the wording implies a certainty that I question.

Because your observations don't match up with mine.

I wouldn't expect them to. Very few people are as observant as I am.

So, basically you're saying that politics and religion didn't exist at all until these two institutions, and all other institutions which you're referring to by extension with them?

No, that's not even close to what I'm saying.
 

Riverwolf

Amateur Rambler / Proud Ergi
Premium Member
I wouldn't expect them to. Very few people are as observant as I am.

It's not "them" that I'm referring to. I'm referring to myself. And you don't know how observant I may or may not be compared to you.

That my observations differ is no indication that I'm "less" observant. It just means that I've been exposed to different things, and my experiences lead to different interpretations.

No, that's not even close to what I'm saying.

Then say whatever you mean plain and clear, so that nothing can be lost in communication. Remember that I have Asperger's Syndrome, and thus lose a lot of communicative subtleties that come so naturally to non-ASD people.
 

Penumbra

Veteran Member
Premium Member
I think disregarding the importance of politics is mainly from a perspective of privilege.

Those who are majorly victimized by politics can literally have life-changing results from political changes, like being able to access healthcare or not, be able to realistically get a quality education or not, having access to clean public parks and other outdoor areas or not, or being imprisoned for their sexual orientation or not.

For people in positions where politics just means paying a 31% or a 33% income tax rate, or whether some mild mortgage deduction exists or not, politics seems more like a thing that other people have to worry about.
 

JustWondering2

Just the facts Ma'am
I wonder why it is that the things that most people generally consider the most serious, are actually the silliest and most ridiculous. If any other species had its priorities as out of whack as we do, it would go extinct in a flash.
I agree Kilgore.
We as humans have only been around for a brief flash of time compared to the age of the Universe. IMHO if we don't change our priorities and wise up we will be going extinct very soon in deed.
 
Top