Rick O'Shez
Irishman bouncing off walls
Impose? Really?
Sometimes yes. They make the text mean what they want it to mean, sometimes perverting it for personal or political ends. Examples are not hard to find, even in the modern world.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Impose? Really?
Sometimes yes. They make the text mean what they want it to mean, sometimes perverting it for personal or political ends. Examples are not hard to find, even in the modern world.
I do not say that it does not happen. The practice is quite rife, however, I see nobody "imposing" religious values on anybody anymore. "Impose" is to strong.
How about Islamic fundamentalists for example?
I am a Christian. I do not have sufficient knowledge of Islamic Fundamentalists, other then they do impose their beliefs on the world. I cannot argue with you on that. I was questioning your use of the word "impose" from the point of view of a christian.
Yes, but religion is morphing into a new phase, using politics as its framework. No, not God ruling a theocracy, socialism is the newest church on the block, yet none of its converts understand they're using the same brick and mortar and that it's just another form of faith based "good old time religion", with Lenin's same useful idiots in the pews and with phoney "compassion" on everyone's lips. Looks like that's what Obama's doing, only morphing mosques instead of churches. Politics and religion have almost always shared the same bed.
Who says that?
I don't know, but I doubt it. I do know that polls indicate that increasingly fewer numbers of people are identifying with any specific religion (the "nones"), which is not the same as saying they are becoming atheists (although that number is growing, just not as rapidly). I've heard it postulated it's due to religions' inability to keep up with a socially progressive change toward acceptance of LGBTQ rights.I can't remember where i read this, or perhaps heard it.. but i've heard/read that religions are slowl declining in favour of science.. would you say this is true? in 200 years from now might there be no religion ? your opinion I'm not sure, so I have no answer I guess..
No, not really.
Vedic literature is not Hinduism. The earliest Upanishads were around 900 BCE. As a culture and religion, Hinduism did not formulate itself until some time later.
Although, everyone is free to believe what they want about their own particular ox.
Avraham Avinu was the first Jew, making Jews about 4,000 yeas old.
Then again, Christianity was fully formed until Constantine made it the religion of the Roman Empire - knocking off about 300 years from Christianity.
And, of course, the Koran and Hadiths weren't written and codified until sometime after Mohammad's death.
I don't know, but I doubt it. I do know that polls indicate that increasingly fewer numbers of people are identifying with any specific religion (the "nones"), which is not the same as saying they are becoming atheists (although that number is growing, just not as rapidly). I've heard it postulated it's due to religions' inability to keep up with a socially progressive change toward acceptance of LGBTQ rights.
That is granting lot to the LGBTQ community. I think most don't want to be identified with what they perceive as the sillier beliefs of the specific religions. Not all wings of those religions are socially Neanderthal.
I am a Christian. I do not have sufficient knowledge of Islamic Fundamentalists, other then they do impose their beliefs on the world. I cannot argue with you on that. I was questioning your use of the word "impose" from the point of view of a christian.
Not necessarily. Both scholars and historians have been wrong on a matter of issues, and I do mean in percentagewise large quantities from time to time.Utter nonsense. It's one thing to prop up or strive to legitimize one's religion, but to ignore what is widely accepted by numerous scholars as well as historians (with out agendas) is ridiculous and narrow minded.
I don't think it has anything to do with it. In reality, lots of people have pretended to be religious over the years for social reasons. They thought that claiming to be religious made them look good to their neighbors. They are now realizing that it is entirely unnecessary to pretend to believe something that they do not believe because it doesn't actually harm them significantly socially to just be honest. That is the biggest mass exodus from religion that has happened over the past decade or so and it's not done yet by any means. The next biggest group are those who figured out that all the questions that religion supposedly answers, it doesn't really answer. They have lost faith in faith because they actually care about what's true and religion simply isn't. A much smaller group are the ones who are leaving because they disagree with what the churches are doing. For most people, once you swill the kool-aid, it doesn't matter what the church does, you're in it win or lose.
I agree, however that is the reason many are giving according to several articles I've read. Social liberalism is a thing, LOL. Even the catholic curch is coming aroubpnd on some social issues.That is granting lot to the LGBTQ community. I think most don't want to be identified with what they perceive as the sillier beliefs of the specific religions. Not all wings of those religions are socially Neanderthal.
But Christianity hasn't historically been any different than modern-day Islam. When Christianity ruled the roost, they put heretics to death, they forced their beliefs on anyone who lived in their world, etc. It wasn't Christianity that changed though, it was secular society that came along and told Christianity to knock it off. I have no doubt whatsoever that if secular society went away, it wouldn't be long before Christians would be out there slaughtering with the best of 'em. Christians aren't any better, they're just more under control than many Muslims.
The Valleys are hardly the US Bible Belt. There are large numbers "Christian" idolaters out there who want to get all stabby for "Jebus". And over here we have had West African "Christians" murdering children because they were "possesed".
That might be true of California; but California is hardly representative of the wider Republic is it?
I don't think it has anything to do with it. In reality, lots of people have pretended to be religious over the years for social reasons. They thought that claiming to be religious made them look good to their neighbors. They are now realizing that it is entirely unnecessary to pretend to believe something that they do not believe because it doesn't actually harm them significantly socially to just be honest. That is the biggest mass exodus from religion that has happened over the past decade or so and it's not done yet by any means. The next biggest group are those who figured out that all the questions that religion supposedly answers, it doesn't really answer. They have lost faith in faith because they actually care about what's true and religion simply isn't. A much smaller group are the ones who are leaving because they disagree with what the churches are doing. For most people, once you swill the kool-aid, it doesn't matter what the church does, you're in it win or lose.
There are 2.2 billion christians in the world today. Many of them follow the false teaching of men, men who draw near to God with their mouth but are far from him in their hearts. Relatively speaking there is but a handful of that number who have been converted my the testimony of the Holy Ghost. Jesus said that only a handful of mine elect will recognise the masters voice. Of course you will find undesirables in a group so large where the majority worship the God of mankind instead of the Christian God. This is all prophecy being fulfilled. It is all a fundamental part of the Plan of Salvation.