Even if you just included Baptists and dismissed Presbytarian and orthodox Catholics that alone would be 50 million. So it should be much more.
You want to triple it to 150 million? sure!
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Even if you just included Baptists and dismissed Presbytarian and orthodox Catholics that alone would be 50 million. So it should be much more.
Orthodox Catholic alone is more times than that. Again though, we're going to disagree over sharia being something akin to fundamentalism (however that works) to the majority of Muslims. Also depends on how you're re qualifying fundamentalism.You want to triple it to 150 million? sure!
It seems like in Isaiah 19 he promised to provide them a savior too. No?
7:59 a.m.: American Airlines Flight 11, a Boeing 767 carrying 81 passengers and 11 crew members, departs 14 minutes late from Logan International Airport in Boston, bound for Los Angeles International Airport. Five hijackers are aboard.Because:
1. Tower 7 was never hit by a plane, neither was the Pentagon or that field in Pennsylvania. Yet tower 7 inexplicably (using valid science anyway) "collapsed"(was demolished).
2. Plane crashes were accounted for in the construction of the twin towers. Regardless of that it is scientific a fact that the planes did not cause the collapse.
There wasn't enough heat to melt steel to make it collapse and both were controlled demolitions.
Apparently you either work for the government or live in a cave.
It WAS terrorism, just not by Muslims.
If you have yet to learn about this I question your intelligence and everything you say is unreliable because you are either gullible or a biggot who is refusing to let go of an excuse to hate someone even if it means remaining (deliberately) ignorant of what really happened.
From your misinterpretation of Quranic verses used to support your theories/agenda, my money is not on gullible.
Seriously though what kind of fool are you, and do you think you are fooling anyone who isn't as big a fool as you with your hate-speech?
Futile, fools are becoming a majority anyway.
Actually:
El, Ilah, are Hebrew and Arabic words meaning deity/god.
Elohim is the proper name of the Hebrew God. From Eloha/Alah (a=e in Hebrew, drop the vowel as originally none were used and you get Alah).
In Arabic it is Al-Ilah or Allah, The God.
All are derived from the Ugaritic "Illu."
So yeah, only in your dreams are they NOT the same God. Abrahamic religions all worship the God of Abraham. You must be some powerful dude if you can decide who God is and isn't without knowing all (or any) of the facts.
And force people to not worship Him with the power of wishful thinking
Islam has the same Prophets, God and shares some stories with Judaism and Christianity both, minus Paul.
And you are just wishing it wasn't true out of bias or biggotry. Any religious scholar or theologian from the 3 religions who isn't a lying extremist will tell you the same thing.
Making you look kind of ridiculous.
You just said a fact wasn't a fact, and your reason is that is what you wish were true.
But Abrahamic means what it means, and the 3 religions acknowledge they share the same God, even if they don't agree on other things.
You have no power to change that unless you choose to be a fanatic, even then it's still a delusion.
He promised that he would save the Gentiles raising up the Messiah from the descendants of Abraham. Isaac and Jacob
Read Moses teachings Deuteronomy 18. Anyone not a Jew is a gentile.
Islam does not follow the Jewish religion or the Christian religion.
They are therefore gentile but they are not part of either covenant.
They do not worship YHWH and they do not practice the faith of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob.
Therefore they are not the people of God and have no covenant with the Messiah.
What did they use to hear the astronauts speak from the moon?How can one make a cell phone call at 30,000 feet flying at 400 MPH?
The most important aspects of the savior described in the Bible is the fulfilling of the prophecies that I have described. These conditions have not come about at any other time in the last 2,000 years. It is impossible if not highly unlikely that they ever will again. It is shocking that it even happened once. We are talking about a time when half the Jews are compelled to leave Jerusalem after an earthquake splits the temple, darkness falls on the earth, a plague kills the other half etc. Then the Asians and Africans unite in a religion at a temple on the border of Egypt etc. etc. In the meantime be aware that the biblical god also challenges all false gods in Isaiah 19: 12 that no other god but he can predict the future so precisely.
Yes I'm aware of all that. Just because the savior did not go around slapping people in the face with this fact as if that was the most important aspect of the prophecy doesn't make him less but more of the person promised in the Bible.
MP could be the proverbial thief in the night. I think we are all aware that Onias IV was busy building temples in Egypt to fulfill that prophecy in Isaiah 19. He was as Jewish as they come. Prophet Zechariah speaks about a descendant of Joshua the high priest, that would include Onias IV and his descendants, who would become as a brand plucked from the fire (of paganism) and given dominion over the world. Similarly Koresh is described as the servant who didn't know God. So we can could SPECULATE that Koresh and MP were the descendants of this priestly line. They would have become members of the Ishmaelite nation by marrying into them with the goal of fulfilling Isaiah 19. After all, Jews began to lose track of this family after booting them from the temple in Jerusalem in the days of the Maccabbees . The Romans demonstrated no love towards them after burning down their temple in Leontopolis.
The Arab historians actually record that Koresh had scriptures but lost them in a flood when the temple treasures were hidden near the well of Zam Zam. In which case, they were Jewish priests who took care of the temple but who had become overwhelmed by the surrounding pagans. Hubal by the way, was the main god of the Koresh. He practiced divination- a feature of the Jewish priesthood. Once again this would be speculation. MP didn't say he was the descendant of Onias IV. However, Y DNA studies are beginning to confirm that the Koresh are the most closely paternally related tribe of gentiles to the Jewish priesthood. The separation between the Cohanim and Koresh is between a thousand and 4,000 years. To put that into perspective the separation between the average European and Cohanim is close to 35,000 years. So the Koresh can no longer be precluded from being considered descendants of the Jewish priests anymore.
Islam is a Din - a family of religions that encompasses Judaism and Judaism, Sabianism etc
Allah is a term for god used by preIslamic Christians for God. He is the god who fulfilled the prophecy in Isaiah 19 that the god of the Bible claimed no other could in 19:12
So far the main difference between the god you worship and mine is that mine has demonstrably fulfilled prophecy and yours hasn't. Also, yours appears to be a racist who wants to slap his tribal identity in everyone's face but mine doesn't
The truth is as Bertrand Russell describes it, the fulfillment of a clearly written complex prophecy that predicts the future that nobody should be able to predict. Isaiah 19 and Matt 24 are two such prophesies that were fulfilled by MP. This, mine did and yours didn't. Everything else is mumbo jumbo.Mumbo Jumbo best suits the contents of your post. The basic of Gods Covenants and his chosen never changed.
You can make all the mumbo jumbo up you want but it won't be the truth.
Nobody said they did. Perhaps you have a reading comprehension problem.Mumbo Jumbo best suits the contents of your post. The basic of Gods Covenants and his chosen never changed.
I LOVE what you have written ! But, is this reality ? I can't seem to be able to square your words with the hadith and koran, and history seems to tell a different story. Can you help me with this?Good point but the unchanged Sharia isn't implemented in too many countries either. So it's irrelevant for now. However, you are right it can be extremely dangerous
Perhaps the next time Muslims are polled about whether they want Shariah or not, the pollsters should also ask do they want it the way it is in the books or do they want it reformed. That would give a more accurate percentage of shariaists in the Islamic world.
I believe MP was promised in the Bible in passages such as Isaiah 19, Matt 24, Dan 10 and Isaiah 44 etc. once those conditions fell upon the earth (darkness, fall in temperatures, plague, volcanoes, death, wars) and MP rose and fulfilled the prophecies of erecting a temple on the border of Egypt, defeated the Persians and Greeks, united the people of Assyria and Egypt and returned the Jews to Jerusalem, the average Christians including those such as the ruler of Ethiopia accepted him as the promised savior.
MPs purpose was to demonstrate that God of the Bible could predict the future. He achieved his purpose
Once MP passed away, the psychopath Umayyads replaced the equally mad and insane Heraclius and Chosroes as the new tyrants in the region. The Koresh did not know God according to Dan 10. They were deployed by God as servants of God to push back the Persians and Greeks so the Jews wouldn't be exterminated and could return to Jerusalem . They weren't chosen for having knowledge about God or his religion. They did their job of humiliating the Persians and Greeks for being insanely cruel to the Jews. Beyond that they really have no knowledge of what MP was teaching. The Umayyads weren't very close to MP and had killed those who were during bloody occupations of both Medina and Mecca. They also imprisoned those who disagreed with them. So what the Umayyads created sometimes contradicts the Quran and at other times combines what they found the Christians practicing under the Justinian code and from their pagan past.
Islam is not a new religion. It refers to a family of faiths that includes Judaism and Christianity as well as Ishmaeliteism. It's basic message is do not to be an extremist. It wants all the nations of the world to worship god thru whichever religion they want as long as they don't practice extreme cruelty when they do it. They are welcome to call this creator by any name as long as it is a beautiful and wholesome name.
Well, you actually gave two answers, essentially yes/no. My Question is simple, based on your reading of the koran and hadith, do you find islam a peaceful religion ? I will ask another very simple question, based upon your reading of The New Testament ( the foundation and principles of the Christian faith) do you find Christianity a peaceful religion ?[/QUOTE] I am not asking about the actions or histories of either faith, I am simply asking if the foundation documents of each faith are peaceful, or not.I answered that question in the first page of this thread. "Religion of Peace?"
I don't think the religion is the same thing as the text. Religion is a practice. So asking me whether the quran or the bible is peaceful is not the same as asking whether Islam or Christianity is peaceful.Well, you actually gave two answers, essentially yes/no. My Question is simple, based on your reading of the koran and hadith, do you find islam a peaceful religion ? I will ask another very simple question, based upon your reading of The New Testament ( the foundation and principles of the Christian faith) do you find Christianity a peaceful religion ? I am not asking about the actions or histories of either faith, I am simply asking if the foundation documents of each faith are peaceful, or not.
You mean you don't see them popping up in English news. As other faiths have been and continue to justify oppressive rules and human rights issues. From Hinduism to Buddhism to various African tribal religions to Shintoism having had been used to be the very backbone of Japanese military expansion behavior et all. But because when they are not at war with us, we largely ignore their extremists.The obvious thing that strikes me is that all these fundamentalists from other faiths are managing to keep a much lower profile than islamics.
You mean you don't see them popping up in English news. As other faiths have been and continue to justify oppressive rules and human rights issues. From Hinduism to Buddhism to various African tribal religions to Shintoism having had been used to be the very backbone of Japanese military expansion behavior et all. But because when they are not at war with us, we largely ignore their extremists.
What did they use to hear the astronauts speak from the moon?
Did they really hit their targets flying at 30,000 feet? At 30,000 feet it may have had a momentarily connection but the planes did not maintain the 30.000 feet if they had the buildings
would still be here.
According to films in America they can make calls from the plane. Or is that all made up too?
These were local flights they hi-jacked as far as I am aware. But they did not maintain 30,000 feet constantly and would easily have been able to use the phones before
any point of impact.
At the moment I'm more concerned about the radical atheists of North Korea than all the radical Muslims in the middle east, to be honest.Those that are at war with us are the ones that I am concerned out, whether they are radical or not.
At the moment I'm more concerned about the radical atheists of North Korea than all the radical Muslims in the middle east, to be honest.
And yet I still think the North Koreans way over there are a larger danger than ME migrants here.We haven’t invited the North Koreans into our countries though.