...which is?my ethics.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
...which is?my ethics.
The problem is that I see in that footage a man who is shot from the front. Not from behind.
And the depository was behind the car.
I didn't see the corpse. I only trust my eyes.Autopsy photos indicate 2 entry wounds from behind. The bullet that entered the skull left a small entry wound at the back of the head and the right side of the frontal bone had an exit wound that was 10x larger, the bone and brain matter blasted outward.
To whom are you referring, what people?I didn't see the corpse. I only trust my eyes.
I don't trust people whose credibility is below zero.
The physicians hired by LBJ.To whom are you referring, what people?
There have been multiple examinations since then.The physicians hired by LBJ.
...which are the best!...which is?
There have been multiple examinations since then.
Evidence? Please specify the individuals who were "paid by the same people".All paid by the same people who say it is absolutely credible that all the gunshots were fired from that building.
It's impossible because that's not what you see on tape.
At 0.125 speed.
I didn't see the corpse.Evidence? Please specify the individuals who were "paid by the same people".
What you think you saw in the film apparently does not mesh with the evidence of the corpse.
That doesn't answer the question, which of the various investigations are you alleging were paid off?I didn't see the corpse.
It's like a suspect tells a judge to believe them on trust.
Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon had been encouraging Kennedy to run for months, believing he could be both a useful chaos agent in the 2024 race
Because I trust my eyes only and I won't let anyone dupe me.That doesn't answer the question, which of the various investigations are you alleging were paid off?
If you haven't seen the corpse then you can't be emphatic about what happened solely on the basis of what you think you saw in the film. Though even the film makes it evident where the second bullet exited from, which was the front of the skull.
Your eyes are not infallible. Of course, you're free to believe what you want but there's half a century of reevaluation of the evidence, including the remains, that confirm the direction of the shooter.Because I trust my eyes only and I won't let anyone dupe me.
If you've never even been to this country,Because I trust my eyes only and I won't let anyone dupe me.
An Icelandic woman would know nothing of lending here.I hope this suffices.
But they do have rely on the facts and evidence, not simply personal preference.I am a jurist. If you tell a judge that horses can fly, the judge won't believe them on trust.
As I told you, I have seen that footage 100 times. I am not exaggerating.But they do have rely on the facts and evidence, not simply personal preference.
If the gunshot came from the front, then please explain why he had a small entry point wound in the back of his head and the entire right side of his frontal bone was blasted outward. If the shots came from the front, the wounds and damage would be reversed. Also, if the shots came from the front, then please explain how the Governor of Texas, who was sitting in front of Kennedy was hit by one of the bullets...from the back. He survived and lived until 1993, he was also ex-military. Are you claiming your eyes are better than an eye witness and survivor?As I told you, I have seen that footage 100 times. I am not exaggerating.
The gunshot comes from the front and not from behind, since a nanosecond before, you can see the bullet penetrating the forehead.
And in fact Jacqueline Kennedy runs away to the back of the car, opposite the shooting direction.
Nobody can convince me that a red purse is actually blue. Because I have a 10/10 eyesight, and am not colorblind.