• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

RFK Jr. and the media reluctant to cover his candidacy

Callisto

Hellenismos, BTW
The problem is that I see in that footage a man who is shot from the front. Not from behind.
And the depository was behind the car.

Autopsy photos indicate 2 entry wounds from behind. The bullet that entered the skull left a small entry wound at the back of the head and the right side of the frontal bone had an exit wound that was 10x larger, the bone and brain matter blasted outward.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Autopsy photos indicate 2 entry wounds from behind. The bullet that entered the skull left a small entry wound at the back of the head and the right side of the frontal bone had an exit wound that was 10x larger, the bone and brain matter blasted outward.
I didn't see the corpse. I only trust my eyes.
I don't trust people whose credibility is below zero (physicians hired by LBJ).
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
There have been multiple examinations since then.

All paid by the same people who say it is absolutely credible that all the gunshots were fired from that building.
It's impossible because that's not what you see on tape.
At 0.125 speed.
 

Callisto

Hellenismos, BTW
All paid by the same people who say it is absolutely credible that all the gunshots were fired from that building.
It's impossible because that's not what you see on tape.
At 0.125 speed.
Evidence? Please specify the individuals who were "paid by the same people".

What you think you saw in the film apparently does not mesh with the evidence of the corpse.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Evidence? Please specify the individuals who were "paid by the same people".

What you think you saw in the film apparently does not mesh with the evidence of the corpse.
I didn't see the corpse.
It's like a suspect tells a judge to believe them on trust.
 

Callisto

Hellenismos, BTW
I didn't see the corpse.
It's like a suspect tells a judge to believe them on trust.
That doesn't answer the question, which of the various investigations are you alleging were paid off?

If you haven't seen the corpse then you can't be emphatic about what happened solely on the basis of what you think you saw in the film. Though even the film makes it evident where the second bullet exited from, which was the front of the skull.
 

averageJOE

zombie
The Democratic Party is a graveyard for progressive ideas. (not that RFK Jr. has progressive ideas)

After the mainstream media and DNC smear and cheat him, and after the Super Delegates make sure he loses, he WILL (just like Marianne Williamson) end up endorsing Biden and tell everyone it's not time to vote 3rd party because "too much is at stake." They are just herding more people into the Democratic Party.

I've already seen this movie.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
That doesn't answer the question, which of the various investigations are you alleging were paid off?

If you haven't seen the corpse then you can't be emphatic about what happened solely on the basis of what you think you saw in the film. Though even the film makes it evident where the second bullet exited from, which was the front of the skull.
Because I trust my eyes only and I won't let anyone dupe me.
 

Callisto

Hellenismos, BTW
Because I trust my eyes only and I won't let anyone dupe me.
Your eyes are not infallible. Of course, you're free to believe what you want but there's half a century of reevaluation of the evidence, including the remains, that confirm the direction of the shooter.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
But they do have rely on the facts and evidence, not simply personal preference.
As I told you, I have seen that footage 100 times. I am not exaggerating.
The gunshot comes from the front and not from behind, since a nanosecond before, you can see the bullet penetrating the forehead.
And in fact Jacqueline Kennedy runs away to the back of the car, opposite the shooting direction.

Nobody can convince me that a red purse is actually blue. Because I have a 10/10 eyesight, and am not colorblind.
 

Callisto

Hellenismos, BTW
As I told you, I have seen that footage 100 times. I am not exaggerating.
The gunshot comes from the front and not from behind, since a nanosecond before, you can see the bullet penetrating the forehead.
And in fact Jacqueline Kennedy runs away to the back of the car, opposite the shooting direction.

Nobody can convince me that a red purse is actually blue. Because I have a 10/10 eyesight, and am not colorblind.
If the gunshot came from the front, then please explain why he had a small entry point wound in the back of his head and the entire right side of his frontal bone was blasted outward. If the shots came from the front, the wounds and damage would be reversed. Also, if the shots came from the front, then please explain how the Governor of Texas, who was sitting in front of Kennedy was hit by one of the bullets...from the back. He survived and lived until 1993, he was also ex-military. Are you claiming your eyes are better than an eye witness and survivor?

Jackie had no idea what was going on, she cradled him when he slumped from the first shot then went into a full-blown panic after she saw his head explode. She was attempting to get to the secret service agent who was behind the vehicle.
 
Top