• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Right move?

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
You choose to ignore that he implemented this policy.
You choose to ignore that he blamed Democrats.
You choose to ignore that he said he had to follow the law created by Democrats.
You choose to ignore that he said only Congress could change his policy.
You choose to ignore that he made a big deal out of making an Executive Order when all he had to do is verbally reverse it.


Why? You seem to have empathy for Trump.

So..............................
 

ecco

Veteran Member
ecco:
You choose to ignore that he implemented this policy.
You choose to ignore that he blamed Democrats.
You choose to ignore that he said he had to follow the law created by Democrats.
You choose to ignore that he said only Congress could change his policy.
You choose to ignore that he made a big deal out of making an Executive Order when all he had to do is verbally reverse it.


Why? You seem to have empathy for Trump.​

So..............................
When you try to make an argument and you ignore multiple facts, it doesn't speak very highly of you. But, you are what you are.
 

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
ecco:
You choose to ignore that he implemented this policy.
You choose to ignore that he blamed Democrats.
You choose to ignore that he said he had to follow the law created by Democrats.
You choose to ignore that he said only Congress could change his policy.
You choose to ignore that he made a big deal out of making an Executive Order when all he had to do is verbally reverse it.


Why? You seem to have empathy for Trump.​


When you try to make an argument and you ignore multiple facts, it doesn't speak very highly of you. But, you are what you are.

Geeze man. Relax. No need to personally insult me.
 

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
ecco:
You choose to ignore that he implemented this policy.
You choose to ignore that he blamed Democrats.
You choose to ignore that he said he had to follow the law created by Democrats.
You choose to ignore that he said only Congress could change his policy.
You choose to ignore that he made a big deal out of making an Executive Order when all he had to do is verbally reverse it.


Why? You seem to have empathy for Trump.​


When you try to make an argument and you ignore multiple facts, it doesn't speak very highly of you. But, you are what you are.

It sure is easy to be rude on a computer isn't it?o_O:rolleyes::facepalm:
 

ecco

Veteran Member
It sure is easy to be rude on a computer isn't it?o_O:rolleyes::facepalm:
Let's try to a keep a little context here.
You posted...
It seems that Trump is damned if he does and damned if he don't. If he did nothing, he's a bad guy. If he does what the other side says he should, he's still a bad guy because he may not have or probably didn't mean it. I could never be a politician.
To which I replied...
ecco:
You choose to ignore that he implemented this policy.
You choose to ignore that he blamed Democrats.
You choose to ignore that he said he had to follow the law created by Democrats.
You choose to ignore that he said only Congress could change his policy.
You choose to ignore that he made a big deal out of making an Executive Order when all he had to do is verbally reverse it.
Why do you think pointing out facts is rude?
 

idav

Being
Premium Member
People become frustrated & angry at disagreement.
We strongly believe what we believe....why can't others
see what's obvious to us? Something's wrong with them!
Here is some Trump supporters doing the debate. A lot of folks including one of my brothers who voted for Trump draw the line at child endangerment. Geraldo Rivera asks “when did we (Republicans) become the party of child abuse”, while debating Sean Hannity.
 

ecco

Veteran Member
Here is some Trump supporters doing the debate. A lot of folks including one of my brothers who voted for Trump draw the line at child endangerment. Geraldo Rivera asks “when did we (Republicans) become the party of child abuse”, while debating Sean Hannity.
WOW! Geraldo Rivera arguing against Hannity?!? That is EPIC!
 
The outcome of a good thing is still good regardless of perceived motive.
Well it wasn't that good - the outcome is at best not quite as bad.

Throwing billiard balls is not ideal. If I throw one aiming at Samuel's head and hit the target, Samuel will cry and possibly die. If Samuel thinks the billiard ball will hit him in the head and and he will die, but instead I aim it at his ribs - as usual, being of the sportish kind, I hit my target and will break Samuel's rib. Could it then be said that throwing a biliard ball at people's ribs is a good thing?
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Here is some Trump supporters doing the debate. A lot of folks including one of my brothers who voted for Trump draw the line at child endangerment. Geraldo Rivera asks “when did we (Republicans) become the party of child abuse”, while debating Sean Hannity.
Certainly, my general criticism of human failings includes people of all political stripes.
(Notice my use of "we"?)
I won't watch the video, but I see Sean Hannity there.....ew....talk about failings.
 
Here is some Trump supporters doing the debate. A lot of folks including one of my brothers who voted for Trump draw the line at child endangerment. Geraldo Rivera asks “when did we (Republicans) become the party of child abuse”, while debating Sean Hannity.
Fox lol
 

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Well it wasn't that good - the outcome is at best not quite as bad.

Throwing billiard balls is not ideal. If I throw one aiming at Samuel's head and hit the target, Samuel will cry and possibly die. If Samuel thinks the billiard ball will hit him in the head and and he will die, but instead I aim it at his ribs - as usual, being of the sportish kind, I hit my target and will break Samuel's rib. Could it then be said that throwing a biliard ball at people's ribs is a good thing?

Why are you throwing billiard balls at Samuel?
 
Top