• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Rittenhouse. What an American Hero. Will Biden apologise?

Whether it's my things or somebody else's things, life is more important than things.

Do you disag
I watched parts of both of them, and the only thing they focused on in the negative was why was Rittenhouse there to begin with, and why was he armed as he was being a teen, and why didn't the military and police tell him to get out of harm's way?

As far as guilty or innocent, I believe both had people covering different sides. And I for one thought that he was likely innocent on the charges under Wisconsin law, and I heard some others say the same on those networks.

Sounds like we agree on this verdict and here is another example of the problem in a different situation:
upload_2021-12-10_16-6-42.png

Come to find out something different happened.
 

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
Whether it's my things or somebody else's things, life is more important than things.

Do you disagree?
Life is more important than things, meaning what? That we should not defend our things? That piece of land that my father gave me, I should just let people trash it if they want, and burn all the trees and pollute the water?
People like these pithy quotes on the internet, but in real life, things mean something. When you have worked and sweated for something, or it's been passed down to you, it's important, and you don't just let someone burn it unless you are a coward.
And BTW, Kyle didn't shoot anyone for things. He only shot to protect his life.
 
Hindsight is usually 20/20.
And why people shouldn’t make comments, rush to judgement or make assumptions before the facts come out. Biden’s comments were wrong on Jussie and Rittenhouse both comments were way off, some news sources joined in the folly, people took up the offense or the gossip and still believe
and promote the lies.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
And why people shouldn’t make comments, rush to judgement or make assumptions before the facts come out. Biden’s comments were wrong on Jussie and Rittenhouse both comments were way off, some news sources joined in the folly, people took up the offense or the gossip and still believe
and promote the lies.
I do agree with you, but let me just add that such jumping to conclusions is hardly just within Biden's domain. IMO, let the facts speak for themselves.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Life is more important than things, meaning what? That we should not defend our things? That piece of land that my father gave me, I should just let people trash it if they want, and burn all the trees and pollute the water?
It means, life takes precedence over material things. I'm pretty sure Jesus would agree with me.

If you want to defend your land, so be it. I don't think killing people is the right choice. I've never understood America's love affair with guns. Especially given the horrendous death rates that result from mass gun ownership.

People like these pithy quotes on the internet, but in real life, things mean something.
It's not a quote. It's how I feel about human life.

When you have worked and sweated for something, or it's been passed down to you, it's important, and you don't just let someone burn it unless you are a coward.
It's not as important as human life, to me. Sorry.

And BTW, Kyle didn't shoot anyone for things. He only shot to protect his life.
He showed up there to shoot people because he thought things were being destroyed.
 

metis

aged ecumenical anthropologist
The question is whether you have the right to defend your property...
It wasn't his property, and I think a screw up is that the police didn't tell him to leave such a hostile environment. If he were black carrying such a gun around while roaming the streets, do you seriously think the police would likely have treated him the same and even handing him a bottle of water? I doubt that very much.
 

Wildswanderer

Veteran Member
It wasn't his property, and I think a screw up is that the police didn't tell him to leave such a hostile environment. If he were black carrying such a gun around while roaming the streets, do you seriously think the police would likely have treated him the same and even handing him a bottle of water? I doubt that very much.
Why? There were black individuals doing the same thing in the same types of situations.
 

SA Huguenot

Well-Known Member
Are you denying that he crossed the state line with a unregistered weapon?
Yes, he did not cross any state lines with a weapon. The weapon was his friend's at his store, and when the looters and arsonists became very dangerous, he was given the firearm by his friend.
The report that Rittenhouse crossed state lines with an unregistered weapon was a false accusation by CNN, and every fake news agency copied this lie.

He did cross the state lines with the firearm, AFTER THE INCIDENT TO SURRENDER HIMSELF TO THE POLICE, BECAUSE THE KENOSHA POLICE DID NOT WANT TO ASSIST HIM.

This guy was realy inocent and you are gulping up fake news lies.
Telling me fox news is somehow right wing propaganda, and you believing CNN is evidence to your ignorance.
 
Top