Oneatatime
Huh?
I wasn't intending to watch the wedding but it was on when I came in from my morning jog. Kate looked hot in her dress and the venue was nice. Wish them both well but thats about as far as my interest goes.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Royal Wedding Coverage
- Thread starter Madhuri
- Start date
A third of the worlds population watched the wedding on TV,not bad.
I like the hats, but the tie -- it's a slob-knot! Doesn't he know how to tie a windsor?This however, is a ridiculous look - but not one that is unexpected considering the source. Mrs Beckham, you goon, lose the hat!
(Proof that money cannot buy class.)
Terrywoodenpic
Oldest Heretic
You can use it for comedy as much as you like. However you may not use copyright footage with out permission.
As it turned out, there were over 2 billion viewers world wide. the TV royalties alone would have paid for the costs.
As usual it was extremely well done and the crowds were massive. They even had 20,000 watching the big screens in Hyde park. Hundreds of people camped out in the streets for three days to secure a good view, lasting perhaps 5 seconds. (including some Americans)
William and Kate are certainly popular.
Terrywoodenpic
Oldest Heretic
I didn't mind the hats but there were some ridiculous looking ones..
Those two are Fergies daughters ... Not hats but "Fascinators"
Terrywoodenpic
Oldest Heretic
He was the only one wearing his OBE ... and on the wrong side.
Only Military were in full dress and wearing decorations.
kai
ragamuffin
Humour me and list me a couple of negatives would you?
Last edited:
I know, i don't understand why though. Why should they reserve any kind of power even if its elementary or small?
What does being born to the current leader has to do with inheriting whatever power or privileges related to the country's representation?
What has those people done to deserve anything?
I didn't say it has negatives to the country, i said is a negative. By that i mean the concept itself is bad, in that it being injustice.
They have a special place exclusive to them based on nothing but blood line, and that place includes many privileges and to some degree power on the country. Do you really think this is a good thing?
kai
ragamuffin
but we like it , Its tailored to suit us and it will keep being tailored to suit us ,and in short ,it suits us. until the day it doesnt and then we will get rid of it.
Well i don't mind it because its exceptional, just because i think its injustice.
However also its not that exceptional really, many countries still have that kind of thing. Perhaps England is the most popular one at this, or their 'royal family' are the most famous ones.
Noaidi
slow walker
I didn't watch it. Over the last few days (weeks? months?), this is all we have had to put up with. It dominates the news, the papers, and every second programme on TV is some wedding-themed nonsense. Now that it's all over, hopefully we can actually hear about what's happening in the rest of the world.
Royal wedding? Don't talk to me about the ******* royal wedding... :verymad: :149:
Royal wedding? Don't talk to me about the ******* royal wedding... :verymad: :149:
FlyingTeaPot
Irrational Rationalist. Educated Fool.
Yeah! We need more streakers man!
To be fair, it did look rather cool and overcast.....
What kind of wedding doesn't have streakers? Frankly, I'm surprised anyone attended.
True. But where is the famous British "Stiff Upper Lip" in all this?
Hey,did you see the royal wedding,wasn't it great,didn't she look luscious,the crowds the..........
