I get that, but I also think it's important to speak up when someone crosses the line, if for no other reason than to point out that some people don't appreciate it.
Sure, people are always free to say what they do appreciate and what they dont, however, did Cohen really cross the line with his parody of Kazakhstan? I personally dont think so, it just gets better (or worse) as Kazakh elements get defensive and even make counter propaganda.
Also, if taking the comedy too seriously makes it worse, then why do I have to go to yearly sensitivity classes? These are mostly race and gender based, should blacks and women just shut up and deal with it? It's just a joke after all.
personally I believe there is a big difference between the cases, mainly because no one would dare insulting a black man if they want to finish the day, nor would they insult women, if they dont want to go to sleep hungry after surviving a hectic day
but seriously though, Kazakhstan is no longer a subjugated Soviet territory (at least not physically), its economy is building up, its status in central Asia is well established, Cohen shouldnt give them a run for their money, and if he does, then it gives credibility to his parody.
I have to say, that im bringing these points, despite the fact, that I have a hard time with many of Cohen's methods and scenes. despite his aggressive methods, he does pull off some priceless scenes, and only because he himself is willing to go to great lengths. he is willing to get burned just as much as his unsuspecting objects of satire.