Say bye bye to Tucker Carlson

[SkepticThinker]

Oh sure, the hypocritical Left loves free speech...............as long as you speak as they speak! When not busy obsessing over the lives of others they are trying to ban words and terms!

Elimination of Harmful Language

We're talking about your hypocritical stance on free speech at the moment.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Because Gay people already achieved acceptability but now they want to shove it down everyone's throat! Self hating trans activist demand that society accept them when they don't even accept themselves! Teaching little children that you can become a different sex by simply chopping off their pecker and dressing up like a girl is a lie, its a sickness!

Mmm hmm. People have been saying that about gay people for decades new. Now you've just replaced "gay" with "trans." Same lame talking points though. You guys really need some new material.

 

[SkepticThinker]

Yes, that's right, children are impressionable. You must have been pampered? And its not that you don't think they should be taught, you just want to indoctrinate them with your worldview......................all while talking tolerance of coarse!

Actually, I grew up reading all the books I could get my hands on. It's how one learns and expands one's mind to new concepts, ideas and points of view. You should give it a whirl sometime. Then maybe you'd understand that it's the complete antithesis of presenting one single worldview. It's actually how people learn to grow and think for themselves. Derp.

Having access to a wide range of books is suddenly considered indoctrination? Nah. I mean, that's hilarious, but nah.

 

[Shadow Wolf]

They are. Don't underestimate Carlson. He is a master spin doctor and he can lie very convincingly. That's why he got that position at Fox and that's why he has a fan base.

They aren't silver tongued is what I'm saying. Carlson is more like an American Idol winner with a clean amd crisp sound and appearance but as far as I could tell those he electrified were those who understand the dogwhistles he uses.

 

[Colt]

We're talking about your hypocritical stance on free speech at the moment.

I'm all for free speech and there are appropriate places for it.

Try this, post anything you want on this forum and you will discover that they have rules! Go ahead, puts some lewd porn on here!

So no, we can't just go into schools with young impressionable minds and put whatever we like in their library! I say no drag queens reading garbage to my kids! Thats not "banning books" but YOU want it to sound like book burning! Not buying it!

BTW, I don't want Christian prayers in schools! I want evolution and real science taught. A religious history class in high schools would be fine, just not a Christian indoctrination!

 

[Colt]

Mmm hmm. People have been saying that about gay people for decades new. Now you've just replaced "gay" with "trans." Same lame talking points though. You guys really need some new material.

I never thought being gay was a "fad", but the trans thing has exploded. I just do not get it!

 

[Subduction Zone]

Yea, I think it was the Jan 6 video's of the cops giving tours of the so called "insurrectionists". The Left wants an insurrectionist narrative to buttress their caricature narrative.

That argument of yours was refuted a long while ago. Why do you keep bringing it up? When you bring up old lost arguments you are only admitting that you are wrong.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Mmm hmm. People have been saying that about gay people for decades new. Now you've just replaced "gay" with "trans." Same lame talking points though. You guys really need some new material.

But this is a new type of gay. That means that it is still okay to hate them.

Hm, smiley or no smiley. Let's try without.

 

[Colt]

That argument of yours was refuted a long while ago. Why do you keep bringing it up? When you bring up old lost arguments you are only admitting that you are wrong.

You are deluded, I wasn't buying your bs then and I don't buy it now!

 

[Nakosis]

The Left has a long history of silencing people who challenge their ideas.

The right too imo. Partly why Tucker and Fox parted ways I suspect.

 

[Father Heathen]

1) You don't even believe in Jesus; you are just an agitator on a religious forum! You deny the existence of God, Jesus and hate Christians!

I don't need to believe in Jesus to recognize two-faced hypocrisy and double standards.
I don't deny god, though. I do however deny mere mortals who presume to speak and act upon his behalf. I have no use for self-appointed and self-serving middlemen; i.e. religion.
I don't hate anyone, although I do pity the willfully ignorant; what a sad existence.

 

[SkepticThinker]

I'm all for free speech and there are appropriate places for it.

Try this, post anything you want on this forum and you will discover that they have rules! Go ahead, puts some lewd porn on here!

So no, we can't just go into schools with young impressionable minds and put whatever we like in their library! I say no drag queens reading garbage to my kids! Thats not "banning books" but YOU want it to sound like book burning! Not buying it!

BTW, I don't want Christian prayers in schools! I want evolution and real science taught. A religious history class in high schools would be fine, just not a Christian indoctrination!

We can't just let people read whatever they want! We must tell them what we think they should be allowed to read, based on our worldview! We must only allow certain people to read books to children, based on our worldview!

All the while accusing me of pushing my worldview on kids by wanting to allow access to a variety of different kinds of books, people, ideas and concepts.
It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

 

[SkepticThinker]

I never thought being gay was a "fad", but the trans thing has exploded. I just do not get it!

Who said you did?

 

[Colt]

I don't need to believe in Jesus to recognize two-faced hypocrisy and double standards.
I don't deny god, though. I do however deny mere mortals who presume to speak and act upon his behalf. I have no use for self-appointed and self-serving middlemen; i.e. religion.
I don't hate anyone, although I do pity the willfully ignorant; what a sad existence.

At least you have a place that provides free therapy for your bitter inner life!

 

[Colt]

We can't just let people read whatever they want! We must tell them what we think they should be allowed to read, based on our worldview! We must only allow certain people to read books to children, based on our worldview!

All the while accusing me of pushing my worldview on kids by wanting to allow access to a variety of different kinds of books, people, ideas and concepts.
It would be funny if it wasn't so sad.

Thats dishonest but typical. I said children! Would you want your children indoctrinated? No need to answer becuse you can't be honest about the simplest elements of an exchange.

 

[Subduction Zone]

You are deluded, I wasn't buying your bs then and I don't buy it now!

No, now you are projecting. You bought a false narrative because you apparently want to give the rioters an excuse.

 

[Subduction Zone]

The right too imo. Partly why Tucker and Fox parted ways I suspect.

Where does "the left" come into play in that explanation?

 

[Father Heathen]

At least you have a place that provides free therapy for your bitter inner life!

Actually, Jesus tagged me in to heal your heart and mind. Each of my posts is like a dose of medicine for the soul.

Can I get a "Hallelujah"?

 

[SkepticThinker]

Thats dishonest but typical. I said children! Would you want your children indoctrinated? No need to answer becuse you can't be honest about the simplest elements of an exchange.

Instead of claiming I'm being dishonest, how about actually addressing my points?

I just explained to you that allowing access to a variety of different reading materials is the exact opposite of indoctrination, and this is what you come back with?

Try harder.

 

[Nakosis]

Where does "the left" come into play in that explanation?

I actually don't think the left had much to do with it.
I suspect it was more between Murdoch and his advertisers.