Science and God

[viole]

I made a grammatical incorrect sentence. You win. Sorry to say, there is no actual price for you.

I always win.

Ciao

- viole

 

[viole]

Yep, atheists think rhetoric is rational and scientific

And you did not notice the mistake in the post you are addressing. Which could explain why we think that, lol.

Ciao

- viole

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

that just says why it seems it easier to go from 1 to many, when you know 1 exists, than reaching 1 for X when you have zero evidence of X.

Is it really so complicated?

Ciao

- viole

It is still in your head and nowhere else. For there to be a multiverse independent of the idea of a multiverse requires observation of a multiverse. You are making a rationalist argument for something which is empirical.

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

I always win.

Ciao

- viole

Good for you. I lose, yet I am still here. It must be frustrating to win all the time, yet the rest of us are still here. Seems to be a hollow victory.

 

[viole]

Good for you. I lose yet, I am still here. It must be frustrating to win all the time, yet the rest of us are still here. Seems to be a hollow victory.

I told you we love you, i am thrilled that you are here. And If you weren’t, I might stop winning,

Ciao

- viole

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

I told you we love you, i am thrilled that you are here. And If you weren’t, I might stop winning,

Ciao

- viole

You don't really win. It is an idea in your head and nowhere else. The only way to win in the long run is to accept that we are all equal as humans and different as individuals. As long as you win in your manner, you loose, because we don't get closer to peace. You just prolong the fight.

 

[Audie]

I told you we love you, i am thrilled that you are here. And If you weren’t, I might stop winning,

Ciao

- viole

You need more of a challenge or you may lose
your edge.

 

[viole]

You don't really win. It is an idea in your head and nowhere else. The only way to win in the long run is to accept that we are all equal as humans and different as individuals. As long as you win in your manner, you loose, because we don't get closer to peace. You just prolong the fight.

I am perfectly at peace. No idea what you are talking about.

Ciao

- viole

 

[viole]

You need more of a challenge or you may lose
your edge.

Darn, i know what you mean. I am afraid of that, too.

I am thinking to simulate a Christian, or a general theist, and challenge the atheists. Seems vastly more difficult. And fun.

Ciao

- viole

 

[Audie]

Darn, i know what you mean.

I am thinking to simulate a Christian and challenge the atheists. Seems vastly more challenging.

Ciao

- viole

Why do you suppose that among the atheists
here you do not see any who are plain bonkers,
but it is so common among the godists?

 

[Darkforbid]

You need more of a challenge or you may lose
your edge.

Oh, really what part of her massively scientific argument did you find most convincing?

 

[viole]

Why do you suppose that among the atheists
here you do not see any who are plain bonkers,
but it is so common among the godists?

I don’t know. But I used to be a Christian apologist, and I think I remember that defending my faith was vastly more challenging than what I do now.

I even proposed, recently, to a few fundamentalistic forums out there, if they would like me to help them with apologetics, especially in the area of philosophical arguments for the existence of God. PSR, modal logic and such. They seem to be so obsessed with Jesus loving them, that they totally forget how flaky the rational basis of their belief is.

Ciao

- viole

 

[Audie]

Oh, really what part of her massively scientific argument did you find most convincing?

There is no need for such when the opposition
auto-defaults to abject loser.

 

[viole]

Oh, really what part of her massively scientific argument did you find most convincing?

Science? I seldom use it. That would be like using a H bomb to kill a mosquito,
Not fun.

Ciao

- viole

 

[Darkforbid]

Why do you suppose that among the atheists
here you do not see any who are plain bonkers,
but it is so common among the godists?

Why don't you move to a 'atheist only' site then?

 

[Audie]

Why don't you move to a 'atheist only' site then?

Ah, send away those who are not bonkers. so
you will feel more at home.

 

[Darkforbid]

Science? I seldom use it. That would be like using a H bomb to kill a mosquito,
Not fun.

Ciao

- viole

You do realise just over half of scientists (51%) believe in some form of deity or higher power

 

[mikkel_the_dane]

I am perfectly at peace. No idea what you are talking about.

Ciao

- viole

Then you can't win, because winning is absence of peace, because winning requires a competition and thus you don't win, because you are at peace.

 

[stvdv]

I came across this video about Science and God.
I know already know that alot of people will denounce this video all because it will not fit into their narrative.
Click on the link below

Thank you for sharing this video. Makes me humble

To believe that whatever happens is "random" is the easiest concept to believe for me, but totally illogical

Because

To believe that such a huge Universe is "perfectly controlled" is totally unimaginable

I just call it "God", meaning "I don't know nor understand" and I'm humble enough to know I will never understand "God" in it's full grandeur

 

[Darkforbid]

Ah, send away those who are not bonkers. so
you will feel more at home.

I wouldn't say your not