• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

scientific and faith

outhouse

Atheistically
ah faith, the great cop out when one has nothing to show.

wanting something to be does not make it so

imagining something does not make it so

belief does not make it so.


in the end you have nothing but the emotions you created yourself.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
ah faith, the great cop out when one has nothing to show.

wanting something to be does not make it so

imagining something does not make it so

belief does not make it so.


in the end you have nothing but the emotions you created yourself.

I will have my emotions...and my thoughts...

I imagine you won't.
 

Skepsis2

Member
if we see the famous scientist of the past and of nowadays

what is the % of beleaver and disbeleaver?

can we make a little list of scientist and their beleaf?

thanks

I get the message from the OP that the question is really how scientist’s religious beliefs have changed over time.
I’ve skimmed the thread and haven’t really seen anyone provide an answer or opinion for the question.
Very briefly, as technology progresses over time the people doing science find that new evidence brought about by the advanced technology sometimes conflicts with their previously held beliefs. This usually results in either the modification of the scientist’s beliefs or ignoring the evidence. This would be more pronounced in biology and astronomy than in say, chemistry. Committed scientists would tend to modify their religious beliefs than to ignore evidence, hence you end up with fewer scientists with fundamental religious views. The numbers or charts would differ depending on whose gathering the statistics and for what reason. IMHO.
 

tumbleweed41

Resident Liberal Hippie
Didn't really consider my last post...did you?

Let's try again, shall we?

Can you show that "spirit" is a necessity of life?
Can you point out "spirit" to anyone?

Or can you admit it is only a belief without empirical evidence?
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
Let's try again, shall we?

Can you show that "spirit" is a necessity of life?
Can you point out "spirit" to anyone?

Or can you admit it is only a belief without empirical evidence?

And 'you' are not a spirit?

Just a lump of clay up on two feet wondering around?
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
no, last time I checked I was still a homo sapien.

could see myself in a mirror to LOL :)




What a poor view of natural anatomy

None the less....a lump of clay.

More than ape?....maybe not...that's made of clay as well.
 

outhouse

Atheistically
None the less....a lump of clay.

More than ape?....maybe not...that's made of clay as well.

you should use that intellect and take a science class.

you might learn the body is mostly salt water

none of it is made of clay :facepalm:
 

tumbleweed41

Resident Liberal Hippie
And 'you' are not a spirit?

Can you show that "spirit" is a necessity of life?
Can you point out "spirit" to anyone?


Just a lump of clay up on two feet wondering around?

None the less....a lump of clay.

More than ape?....maybe not...that's made of clay as well.

Let's see...
Pure clay is made of Silica, Alumina, and one of three different metals (Potassium, Sodium or Lithium)


The chemical composition of the human body is Oxygen, Carbon, Hydrogen, Nitrogen, Calcium, Phosphorus, Potassium, Sulfur, Chlorine, Sodium, Magnesium, Iron, Cobalt, Copper, Zinc, Iodine, Selenium and Fluorine.

There is no Silica or Alumina in a healthy human body.:foot:


Now, are you ready to admit the existence of "spirit" is only a belief without empirical evidence?
 

LuisDantas

Aura of atheification
Premium Member
Thief, have you heard of the concept of a philosophical zombie? It is an interesting exercise.

In a nutshell, what do you think we would end up with if a normal human lost his spirit? Can one even notice that it happened? Do spirits even exist at all?

It is hardly reasonable to insist that others believe in something which leaves no trace whatsoever of its existence.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
You guys!

Denial.... denial.... denial....
All the while you rebuttal....with such spirit!

....bit shallow of thought and short sighted...but very spirited.

And I happen to love science....
And you all know what is meant by...'clay'.

If you want me to treat you as if intelligent.....admit you are more than dust...or clay.
 

tumbleweed41

Resident Liberal Hippie
And you all know what is meant by...'clay'.

No, we don't. Clay is clay.
Nor is "clay" a Biblical reference. It is Qur'anic.
If you want me to treat you as if intelligent.....admit you are more than dust...or clay.

If you want to be treated as intelligent, don't make statements like "admit you are more than dust...or clay", as neither is an accurate description of biological life.
 

Thief

Rogue Theologian
No, we don't. Clay is clay.
Nor is "clay" a Biblical reference. It is Qur'anic.


If you want to be treated as intelligent, don't make statements like "admit you are more than dust...or clay", as neither is an accurate description of biological life.

Well then...clever boy....take your pick what ever you are made of.

And that lump is going to answer me..... as a chemical reaction?

'bang'
 
Top