ImmortalFlame
Woke gremlin
Equating disagreements between experts in a given field and laymen is pretty fallacious. You cannot compare conflicting research carried out by scientists with debate between people defending the very basic principles of science from people who are rejecting them.I did a search on it with Google Scholar. Most of the results are about disagreements between researchers. Do researchers have mock debates with each other where call their own views “scientific” and “evidence based,” and opposing views “unscientific,” and call each other “science deniers”? I would need to see some examples of how they use the words “science” and “evidence” in discussing their disagreements with each other in professional journals and conferences.
And scientists regularly do call ideas that qualify as unscientific "unscientific", yes. It's not about respectful debate, it's about calling a spade a spade. I don't understand what the issue is.