Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What?? If more complicated to describe, then, ToE is wrong. Reality is simple if you knew it well.Well, duurrh, obviously if you know the theory you are not dumb, right?
The basic principle of Darwinian evolution is simple enough to grasp but, since his time we have discovered further processes by which change occurs over time, which make it more complicated to describe.
Do you think quantum theory is simple?
Oooooh! Capital letters (Powerful Correct Scientific Explanations)! Does it get any proofier than that?
I believe that might have been an approximation of the French "voila!"
But watching the Mongolians sweep across the land would give us something in the news that isn't US politics or covid, lol.
Yes to all of them, if you knew them well... did reality mislead you?
Oh, gosh, I'm agog with excitement, and can hardly wait! (Though, I admit, I've been there before, and every single time wound up disappointed.)
Thank you. I think yes, since I always heard that word from Scotty Kilmer, you know, the car repair Guy., and me, the Discoverer and Intelligent Guy....lol and Bill Nye is science guy and Ken Ham?? The CEO guy... that is how I write science articles, with fun and substance...
Ever study statistics? Calculus? Ever try to avoid using circular definitions when trying to define something?
But, let us be fair to all claimants and write science articles FREELY even in Zenodo and fight intellectually, science vs science, model vs model... and see who is the best... If they will fight squarely, I think will surely win..
That's not how academic writing is done. They are expected to be evidence based, objective, and to be written in a manner that conveys you understand the process. Using "period" as you did in something you call a science article just demonstrates your lack of training in the area.
Of course I knew that there things that are complicated, but in science, the work and responsibility and job of scientists is to straighten them out. That is why they are being paid and receive grants/money, to do it...
I knew your disappointment but I know too reality better than anybody, if not, I will never discover intelligence.
Bill Nye was a debate opponent of Ken Ham. One of ID's major names against someone who has a bachelor's in engineering who hosted a kids science show and isn't even a scientist. That alone should speak volumes when an ID titan debated against someone who's credentials aren't even impressive in the relevant fields.
They're work isn't to straighten things out. The universe is under no obligation to make sense to us. A scientist just figures out how things work.
Prob with spouting nonsense -
It does. Scientists receive tax payers money, and others from grants... or defund them (not the police!)
That is how confident I am, I am a discoverer, not an ordinary scientist who supports another's theory or explanation. SEE the differences! If they dis-agree, my articles are there to rebut, tell them to fight squarely intellect vs intellect and show me that I am wrong. Oh, I love to be falsified and rebutted, if anyone could do it. START HERE: define intelligence scientifically. Go, and ask all of them to do it, before I submit my article to science journal. Go, and let us enjoy science and see who is real educated well... I CHALLENGE YOU, in the name of science, go and do it...and let us see... YOU SEE how I use my real name and picture, and see how serious I am...