• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Self-realization/Enlightenment question.

I have not read any development of what exactly was experienced here by the OP.

But it has been praised and awarde esteem and respect and honor and even a little bit of admiration and good natured envy.

No one mentioned if the experienced dovetails or has a relation to Buddha's nobel truths, esp the 1st nobel truth, 'all the world is sufferring'.

Why is this 1st nobel truth alway missing from the discussion?
 

Windwalker

Veteran Member
Premium Member
@Windwalker

To sum up

What you are saying is 'Sarvam Khalu-idam brahman'

And I am talking about 'Brahma-satyaa jagat mithyA' and 'Tat Tvam Asi'

Both are same. I think we are talking about same thing, only way of expression is different.
I do agree with you. I see it both ways. It is really more a matter of which perspective you may wish to look at it with. I am fond of this statement from Shankara which to me encompasses both:

The world is an illusion
Brahman alone is real
Brahman is the world.


Swami Ramdas (Papa Ramdas) has said, either you either you negate your 'I' till it vanishes or you expand it so that it becomes universal and infinite.

One experiences everything is brahman and then experiences that the world is not existent and only 'I' i.e Brahman exists (ajAta vAda).

Or someone will experience nirvikalp samadhi (ajAta vAda) first i.e. no existence of this world and mAyA, and then everything you see is brahman.

In either ways one is free, order is not important. Which experience happens first depends upon prakruti.
Indeed. There is no single way in which we come to this, and what is opened to you is necessary for you. This is true for everyone.

Yes we have to allow things to happen - Thats true for both ways.
Yes.

What you say is mostly happens to a Yogi, but it's not only that Yogis experience the same thing.

As mind becomes purified and more subtle (sukshma) one will have different experiences. Everything that is experienced is in mAyA, so even constant unfolding is also under mAyA, changless, formless, without attribute is supreme brahman.
The experiences are forms of truth for us to know what is beyond all forms. Experience gives way to the formless.

But as I have said, negation of this world is not the only way and one can be one with God as you say :)
I tend to see it as both happening together for me. It's hard to describe this for me personally, but I understand negation to be sure.

After realization, what you say that ' this is beautiful' as if you are looking for first time is also said by Swami Sukhbodhananda, mostly in Shiva Sutras.

So when destination and so the result is same, we can peacefully end this, else in the name of the one which is 'not expressible' we will keep expressing.

I hope you do not mind ending here.

Nice talking to you.

Aum
The pleasure is mine.

:namaste
 

Twilight

Member
namaste :namaste

I have not read any development of what exactly was experienced here by the OP.

I did try and further explain my experience after your first reply. It's back there somewhere... on page 3 I think. :eek:


No one mentioned if the experienced dovetails or has a relation to Buddha's nobel truths, esp the 1st nobel truth, 'all the world is sufferring'.

Why is this 1st nobel truth alway missing from the discussion?

Can you mention it? It seems like it may be important :)
 

Amrut

Aum - Advaita
I have not read any development of what exactly was experienced here by the OP.

But it has been praised and awarde esteem and respect and honor and even a little bit of admiration and good natured envy.

No one mentioned if the experienced dovetails or has a relation to Buddha's nobel truths, esp the 1st nobel truth, 'all the world is sufferring'.

Why is this 1st nobel truth alway missing from the discussion?

Namaste mohini ji,

1st Truth is indeed noble :) - it is pre-requisite for advaita. But not for other paths.

I understand that not many people read my looong replies, specially when they are not related to you. I have mentioned it, but not in naked form.

"All the world is suffering" This produces vairagya - dispassion in society. Vairagya is absence of worldly thoughts. So if your mind does not go into samsara, then it is with God. So thinking of God all times is vivek-yukta vairagya i.e. dispassion accompanied by discrimination and not an impulsive reaction which one can take if one is not capable of feeding his family (jobless, etc) or due to a trauma (when young son dies, etc).

The reason of not talking too much about suffering is because this is a public forum and not all joining or asking questions have moksha as the only goal. All have desires. You may have read the statement like not giving up responsibility, etc in this thread. This is the general mental status. Actual guidance is only possible when one sits in front if Guru and there is face-2-face, one-on-one talk with each other. Some things are left for questioner to think and contemplate ;)

If before time comes, or say if one has desires and is not ready to give them up, and you keep talking about renunciation of desires, quoting from shastras, then the questioner is not left to say anything. He is not in position (mind is not ready) to renounce anything, and the ideals set are very high. So what will happen in this case? instead of progressing and finding peace within and being cheerful and contented, exact opposite with happen in his life. Now this is a dangerous situation.

So I have advised to one respected member that moderation is necessary. Anything in excess is poison.

1. work
2. sex
3. rest
4. enjoyment
5. meditation (includes spiritual activities like reading shastras, which are important, but meditation is the core thing

Path of renunciation is not for everybody? why? here are some quotes which I have collected. But before, getting onto these verses, lets clarify something.

If you read some if my replies, I have given seven points which could be of help. To add to it, further I have said, it is time to dive deep within. OP thought if the experience is Self-Realization and whether it is permanent, to which I have answered according to my limited knowledge. Later discussion was between me and Windwalker ji.

Please note that not by speaking negative about this samsara, but by thinking on brahman, one merges in brahman. I have collected some verses from shastras. In an attempt to explain Advaita, I have tried to pen down my personal thoughts and extracts from discourses that I have listened explain advaita. I have put them online in a form of website. I do not want to market it, but if you wish to positively understand advaita, you can PM me and I will give you the link. I have faith that right souls will be attracted to it.

EDIT: Encouragement is necessary :)

Ok, so here are some verses.

Bhagavan in Gita says that

क्लेशोऽधिकतरस्तेषामव्यक्तासक्तचेतसाम्।
अव्यक्ता हि गतिर्दुःखं देहवद्भिरवाप्यते।।12.5।।

12.5 Greater is their trouble whose minds are set on the unmanifested (Nirguna brahman); for the goal; the unmanifested, is very hard for the embodied to reach.

The path is difficult because the aspirant has to give up attachment to the body from the very beginning of his spiritual practice.The embodied: Those who identify themselves with their bodies. Identification with the body is Dehabhimana. The imperishable Brahman is very hard to reach for those who are attached to their bodies. Further, it is extremely difficult to fix the resltess mind on the formless and attributeless Brahman.

Sri Ramana Maharshi in Sri Ramana Gita Chapter 7 says:

Ones who have purified their mind through sadhana (meditation) or by Sattvik Karma in past lives can practice advaita Vedanta. He further says that one who does not give much importance to his body and senses and has no interest in the worldly affairs instead of being surrounded by worldly issues are considered as eligible for Self Enquiry.

Svetasvatara Upanishad also says that same thing (6.23) -

यस्य देवे परा भक्तिः यथा देवे तथा गुरौ ।
तस्यैते कथिता ह्यर्थाः प्रकाशन्ते महात्मनः ॥
प्रकाशन्ते महात्मन इति ।6:23।

यस्य For whom देवे to God परा भक्तिः Supreme devotion यथा देवे as to God तथा So गुरौ To the Master ।
तस्यैते To that [high souled / pure mind] one कथिता expounded ह्यर्थाः these truths प्रकाशन्ते shine महात्मनः to that high souled॥ प्रकाशन्ते महात्मन इति shine as High Soul indeed.

These truths, when taught, shine forth only in that high-souled one / pure mind who has Supreme Devotion to God, and an equal degree of devotion the Spiritual Master. They shine forth in that High-Souled one only.

Bhagavan in Gita says, men of knowledge are rare

मनुष्याणां सहस्रेषु कश्चिद्यतति सिध्दये।
यततामपि सिध्दानां कश्चिन्मां वेत्ति तत्त्वतः।।7.3।।

manuṣyāṇāṅ sahasrēṣu kaścidyatati sidhdayē.
yatatāmapi sidhdānāṅ kaścinmāṅ vētti tattvataḥ..7.3..

7.3 Among thousands of men, one perchance strives for perfection; even among those successful strivers, only one perchance knows Me in essence (tatva).

Note: Here, bhagavan says 'knows' and not 'sees'. Also note that knows 'Me' in essence (tatva).

This verse is connected with 7:19, which is explained in the section " 'I' or 'Me' can be taken as 'Brahman' "


संन्यासस्तु महाबाहो दुःखमाप्तुमयोगतः।
योगयुक्तो मुनिर्ब्रह्म नचिरेणाधिगच्छति।।5.6।।

saṅnyāsastu mahābāhō duḥkhamāptumayōgataḥ.
yōgayuktō munirbrahma nacirēṇādhigacchati..5.6..

5.6 But, O mighty-armed one, renunciation is hard to attain without (Karma-) yoga. The meditative man equipped with yoga attains Brahman without delay.

Aum
 
Last edited:

Twilight

Member
:D

... preparing for armageddon :D

well, jokes apart, after having intense sessions of tatva jnana, it's time to take a break


Armageddon always sounds frightening but I doubt it is so if it is filled with blissfulness. However, I think the road to Armageddon still has the potential to be very frightening.

I will practice Bhakti and what will be will be. I think I will leave the advaita texts well alone at the moment. Although they are profound they have the potential to lead me into a nihilistic breakdown. :run:
 

Amrut

Aum - Advaita
Armageddon always sounds frightening but I doubt it is so if it is filled with blissfulness. However, I think the road to Armageddon still has the potential to be very frightening.

I will practice Bhakti and what will be will be. I think I will leave the advaita texts well alone at the moment. Although they are profound they have the potential to lead me into a nihilistic breakdown. :run:

good luck :)
 

DanielR

Active Member
I will go against the majority and say since enlightenment is a timeless state that we have initially forgotten I do believe it is indeed possible to "reforget" and fall back into time. To say the self realization can never be forgotten is technically true but it is mostly poetry. The memory of enlightenment is not enlightenment.


I kind of agree with this, what if Brahman starts Leela again, and 'we' are trapped again in Samsara, can we really be sure this won't happen?
 

Maya3

Well-Known Member
Life is suffering is a Buddhist concept.

In Hinduism we talk about Lila, Play.

This is a great discussion. I´ve been reading it although I have not commented to much.

Maya
 

Amrut

Aum - Advaita
I kind of agree with this, what if Brahman starts Leela again, and 'we' are trapped again in Samsara, can we really be sure this won't happen?

मामुपेत्य पुनर्जन्म दुःखालयमशाश्वतम्।
नाप्नुवन्ति महात्मानः संसिद्धिं परमां गताः।।8.15।।

8.15 As a result of reaching Me, the exalted ones who have attained the highest perfection do not get rebirth which is an abode of sorrows and which is impermanent.

Source: Select Text | Gita Supersite 2.0 (Beta)

I think you should trust God, as Gita is said by God himself :)
 

Sumit

Sanatana Dharma
I kind of agree with this, what if Brahman starts Leela again, and 'we' are trapped again in Samsara, can we really be sure this won't happen?
Mokesh is not permanent. It's for a long period but impermanent. Soul returns from mokesh and is again involved in samsara.
 

Onkara

Well-Known Member
Firstly I think the answer to DanielR's quesiton might also depend on the individuality of the soul or not. If there is no individual distinct soul then there is no going and returning in theory, it is rather something else which causes Samsara and any sensation of coming and going.

Also I understand Lila is found its popularity through the Srimad Bhagavatam and Vaishanvism (Sri Vallabhacharya and Sri Chaitanya). I don't think it is was in the Vedas (perhaps someone can quote to confirm).
 

Sumit

Sanatana Dharma
Also I understand Lila is found its popularity through the Srimad Bhagavatam and Vaishanvism (Sri Vallabhacharya and Sri Chaitanya). I don't think it is was in the Vedas (perhaps someone can quote to confirm).
Yes :yes: . Brahman does not play lila.
 

Maya3

Well-Known Member
Once we understand who we really are, then we are not so attached to everything in the world and can see our participation in things as divine play.

Maya
 

jagat

Member
When self-ignorance is destroyed by self-knowledge then there is no more Samsara, because its cause, ignorance, is not there.

DanielR,

what if Brahman starts Leela again, and 'we' are trapped again in Samsara, can we really be sure this won't happen?

For the knower of Brahman there is no question about Leela or Samsara; neither truly (independently) exist. What 'appears' to exist, be it the play of Leela or the countless Jivas caught in the Samsaric net, is known to be but Brahman only, one's own Self. There is no suffering in the secondless Self. For the knower this doubt does not arise.
 

Onkara

Well-Known Member
This verse seems apt:

Bhagavad Gita Chapter 14, Verse 2.
bump.gif
By becoming fixed in this knowledge, one can attain to the transcendental nature, which is like My own nature. Thus established, one is not born at the time of creation nor disturbed at the time of dissolution.
 

Amrut

Aum - Advaita
This verse seems apt:

Bhagavad Gita Chapter 14, Verse 2.
bump.gif
By becoming fixed in this knowledge, one can attain to the transcendental nature, which is like My own nature. Thus established, one is not born at the time of creation nor disturbed at the time of dissolution.

Namaste,

While I quoted BG 8:14, you have hit bulls eye. This verse seems apt. Thanks for sharing.

I have checked many translations from the below links

Select Text | Gita Supersite 2.0 (Beta)

Aum
Amrut
 
Top