Laniakea
Not of this world
I'm ready for you to demonstrate.Yes.
Can you?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I'm ready for you to demonstrate.Yes.
Can you?
Does he? Then he definitely should be doing so. Of course you probably saw him when he was standing all by himself.Then maybe you should tell Biden to wear a mask now that he has Covid. Or does your standard not apply to Democrap?
I did not make your mistakes. When you do better you can demand answers.You didn't answer my question about whether or not you're wise.
Try again. Not answering a question is admitting you don't believe you're wise. I'll give you the chance to prove otherwise.
It is rather rude to ignore my question when I have answered your question.I'm ready for you to demonstrate.
Does he? Then he definitely should be doing so. Of course you probably saw him when he was standing all by himself.
Does how and when one wears a mask have to be explained to you again? If you are around people at risk that is when mask wearing is a must. He is fully vaccinated and boosted so it should be just a mild infection for him. His Secret Service are also going to be fully vaccinated and boosted, and he canceled a public event. It seems that he is doing the right thing.
You know that on the other hand Trump did exactly the opposite.
Once again, ever MAGA accusation is a confession.
Actually you are so far behind on the burden of proof that no one really has to do anything for you for a while.I'm ready for you to demonstrate.
I did not make your mistakes. When you do better you can demand answers.Actually you are so far behind on the burden of proof that no one really has to do anything for you for a while.
If you are not going to follow the rules for polite debate you cannot demand answers from others.
Was he? Prove it. You do not understand "whataboutism". It is not "whataboutism" if the person making rather weak accusations is trying to defend someone ten times worse. Every time that I have seen you try to use whataboutism it was a trivial wrong by Biden compared to a massive wrong by Trump.He was around plenty of other people in the news report.
Bringing up Trump in your whataboutism indicates a defensiveness on your part, indicating you agree with me, but don't want to admit it.
Nice, she is copying me again. She still has a crush on me.I did not make your mistakes. When you do better you can demand answers.
Prove it. You only appear to have an emotional argument against it. If you want to convince those that do not agree with you emotional arguments rarely work, and even if you convince someone with one it is usually temporary.Was he? Prove it. You do not understand "whataboutism". It is not "whataboutism" if the person making rather weak accusations is trying to defend someone ten times worse. Every time that I have seen you try to use whataboutism it was a trivial wrong by Biden compared to a massive wrong by Trump.
Seriously, you really need to learn the basics of debate.
Another false claim from you.It is rather rude to ignore my question when I have answered your question.
I don't have a crush on other women. Wouldn't your husband resent me if I did?Nice, she is copying me again. She still has a crush on me.
and another misquote from you.Another false claim from you.
You really need to learn the rules of debate.
Non Sequitur.and another misquote from you.
You do know that forum rules require you cite your quotes, right?
Regardless of your correct/incorrect usage...
Sweet.Non Sequitur.
Try again.
Oh great, now you're using Poe's Law again.Sweet.
You went from misquoting others to revealing you ignorance of logical fallacies.
Oh my, No I am not female. And too much for you at any rate.I don't have a crush on other women. Wouldn't your husband resent me if I did?
You wouldn't need to be a female to have a husband.Oh my, No I am not female. And too much for you at any rate.
Oh great, now you're using Poe's Law again.
omg!You wouldn't need to be a female to have a husband.
Oh my! I never expected to see such transphobic based statements from you!