Trailblazer
Veteran Member
I agree, and add that sex without romantic love is pretty bad.sex with romantic love is pretty good.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I agree, and add that sex without romantic love is pretty bad.sex with romantic love is pretty good.
I agree, and add that sex without romantic love is pretty bad.
I wouldn't know since I never had sex without love.I wouldn't go that far, romantic love can add an extra dimension but sex without love can be pretty awesome.
No one is telling you that you have to go about your sex life in any other manner. Nor is anyone telling you that you ought to do things differently..I wouldn't know since I never had sex without love.
I have only ever had sex with one man, my late husband.
Thanks, but I did not think they were telling me that I ought to do things differently.No one is telling you that you have to go about your sex life in any other manner. Nor is anyone telling you that you ought to do things differently..
How would you know?I agree, and add that sex without romantic love is pretty bad.
No, I would not know what sex without romantic love is like since I never had it.How would you know?
Pretty bad in what way?No, I would not know what sex without romantic love is like since I never had it.
When I said it is 'pretty bad' I did not mean bad in the sense that you are probably thinking.
I did not mean it is not physically enjoyable. I meant I think it is 'pretty bad' to have sex without romantic love.
Mind you, that is not a judgment on anyone who engages in that kind of sex. Different strokes for different folks.
Pretty bad because it is sex just for the sake of physical pleasure and nothing more. I cannot even imagine having sex solely for that resason since I believe sex is a sacred bond between two people who love each other, but different strokes for different folks.Pretty bad in what way?
I agree, and add that sex without romantic love is pretty bad.
I wouldn't know since I never had sex without love.
I have only ever had sex with one man, my late husband.
Sex without romantic love is not necessarily just for the sake of physical pleasure. I usually choose partners who are friendly, playful, adventurous and clever.Pretty bad because it is sex just for the sake of physical pleasure and nothing more. I cannot even imagine having sex solely for that resason since I believe sex is a sacred bond between two people who love each other, but different strokes for different folks.
Thanks for widening my horizons.Sex without romantic love is not necessarily just for the sake of physical pleasure. I usually choose partners who are friendly, playful, adventurous and clever.
It is only pretty bad in my opinion, an opinion I held long before I ever had a religion or a belief in God.But even it it was simply for the sake of physical pleasure, what would be pretty bad about that?
Are you making a distinction between believe in and want? I believe in eating a triple scoop bana split, but I don't want one. And haven't since my 20s.It is only pretty bad in my opinion, an opinion I held long before I ever had a religion or a belief in God.
I do not believe in having sex even in wedlock just for physical pleasure. If there is no love, I do not want sex.
Good point.Are you making a distinction between believe in and want? I believe in eating a triple scoop bana split, but I don't want one. And haven't since my 20s.
I sure hope not!Should I sneak into the bedroom and break it up?
Are you worried???I sure hope not!
No, because I know you'd never do that.Are you worried???
UnderstoodGood point.
I do not want to have sex even in wedlock just for physical pleasure. If there is no love, I do not want sex.
It is not against my beliefs to have sex just for pleasure as long as it is wedlock.