Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
That's your point.Yeah, well, if/when the USA actually does it, then we can have a completely different conversation. The point is, it's not being done, while many problems continue to fester and smolder unchecked.
That's your point.
I advocate for what should be.
A classical liberal...not the modernSo you're a liberal? That's cool.
Do I get a refund on my payments to date?I'll wager that no nation makes all education
available to all for free. Resources are limited,
so there must be an allocation mechanism.
But lets leave that discussion for the school
loan thread.
Do you have any thoughts about home loans?
No!Do I get a refund on my payments to date?
No, because if you turned a house over toShould people be dying in the streets and squating in shacks while millions of homes sit empty and fall to ruin becaus capitalism is a failed economic system?
A classical liberal...not the modern
authoritarian socialistic kind.
40% of the homeless people in the U.S. have jobs. But capitalist greed has determined that they shouldn't be paid a wage that enables them to live in a house. Also, it was capitalist greed that got many of those addicts hooked on drugs. And so far as I know, not one capitalist has yet gone to prison for it. Nor are any of them ever likely to,No, because if you turned a house over to
an addict, soon you'd have a worse problem.
My statement was broader than just making it free.
Consider...
Can a student collect PhDs in various fields that
don't yield benefits commensurate with the cost?
I suppose drug kingpins could be called40% of the homeless people in the U.S. have jobs. But capitalist greed has determined that they shouldn't be paid a wage that enables them to live in a house. Also, it was capitalist greed that got many of those addicts hooked on drugs. And so far as I know, not one capitalist has yet gone to prison for it. Nor are any of them ever likely to,
If foreigners were responsible for killing thousands upon thousands if U.S. citizens by deliberately addicting them to drugs, for profit, we would lay their country to waste. But here at home, we can do this to each other with impunity so long as it's for profit. Because profit is the motive for everything we do. And the excuse.
Let's move Chicago, Newark and Detroit toI suppose that's possible, though I don't know about the systems those countries use, exactly. That said, if one was worried about someone using tax dollars to persue majors on "gender studdies" or something like that, those could be out of wallet while more practical majors such as STEM could be publicly funded
As for Norway, though, the biggest criticism I see of their system is that the education gained by their public "free" system isn't as good as, say, an ivy league or more recognized schools. On the flip side, a huge amount of their population is highly educated since it's so easily attainable for anyone. That seems like a pretty sweet deal to me
In 2018, he was admitted to hospital following a near-overdose. As feared, the hospital reported him to CNB and he ended up incarcerated in a Drug Rehabilitation Centre (DRC), a state-run rehabilitation facility. Ben described DRC as a “total prison setting”: he slept on the floor, food was served under the door, and residents were “packed” eight to a cell. Visits were permitted only twice a month. It was, as he said, “a tough time in my life”, experienced more as punishment than as care.Behold our glittering city
Nobody and nothing is perfect.In 2018, he was admitted to hospital following a near-overdose. As feared, the hospital reported him to CNB and he ended up incarcerated in a Drug Rehabilitation Centre (DRC), a state-run rehabilitation facility. Ben described DRC as a “total prison setting”: he slept on the floor, food was served under the door, and residents were “packed” eight to a cell. Visits were permitted only twice a month. It was, as he said, “a tough time in my life”, experienced more as punishment than as care.
Understanding drug use, addiction, and drug policy in Singapore
Singapore has made no secret of its “zero tolerance” stance on drugs and drug use. But how much do we actually know about this issue? What drives drug use and addiction? What resources are availabl…transformativejusticecollective.org
I wasn't referring to illegal drug manufacturers, I was talking about the pharmacuitical companies that pushed opioids as non-addictive on doctors for decades knowing full well that they were highly addictive.I suppose drug kingpins could be called
capitalists, much as Kim IL Jung or the
boys of 911 could be called typical theists.
All human beings deserve to have a safe place to live. Rich people should not be deciding who lives and who dies based on whether or not they are economically profitable or morally acceptable.As for percents, even falsely assuming there's
nothing misleading in the numbers you cite,
there's the % who are addicts, mentally ill,
and who by no standard should be given a house.
Not in a culture that values money more than it values human life.Then too, doing odd jobs isn't going to make a living anywhere.
Comments like this are why the rich should never be allowed to decide who lives and who dies economically. And yet that is exactly what happens under a capitalist system.Some homeless are probably unlucky. Those whose
situation isn't from chronic poor decision making won't
stay homeless.
I'll wager that no nation makes all education
available to all for free. Resources are limited,
so there must be an allocation mechanism.
But lets leave that discussion for the school
loan thread.
Do you have any thoughts about home loans?
But is it an expense, or an investment?No, education is not "free". Taxpayers pay for it.
Do the 'benefits' need to be financial?My statement was broader than just making it free.
Consider...
Can a student collect PhDs in various fields that
don't yield benefits commensurate with the cost?
I mean, obviously, there’s competition: you need to apply to higher education and be admitted, either via good grades, or -if you’re a mature student- by submitting proof of work-experience and scoring well on applicable entry tests. But if you get that far, there are several countries with no tuition fees for higher education. It’s a good thing - for sure.I'll wager that no nation makes all education
available to all for free. Resources are limited,
so there must be an allocation mechanism.
But lets leave that discussion for the school
loan thread.
Do you have any thoughts about home loans?
Little Denmark, for one, actually pays students to attend university. Maybe others do, as well. I don't know.Actually a lot of developed countries do; Norway, Sweden, Germany, Denmark, Finland, Austria, Greece, France, etc. however housing and food is not always for free and in many cases not the concern of the college/university at all.
As to forgiving homer loans....being totally mercenary....YES...because then mine would be gone.... being less self-centered and more level headed....No, because I think it would be a major hit to the Economy. ..and just cost taxpayers more and more and more