• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Should it be Illegal to Indoctrinate Kids With Religion?

Profound Realization

Active Member
“Religion should remain a private endeavor for adults,” says Giovanni Santostasi, PhD, who is a neuroscientist at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and runs the 10,000 person strong Facebook group Scientific Transhumanism. “An appropriate analogy of religion is that’s it’s kind of like porn—which means it’s not something one would expose a child to.”

Some Atheists and Transhumanists are Asking: Should it be Illegal to Indoctrinate Kids With Religion? | HuffPost


Make it illegal to bring kids to church until they're 18? Until they have developed some rational skepticism?
Constitutionally in the US can't do this, if we could though, would it be a good idea?

Why or why not?

View attachment 18759

Making something legal/illegal are just subtle ways of indoctrination in itself.

So no, in my opinion. Children are more wiser than adults in my perception.
 

Profound Realization

Active Member
You really just have to teach them it's ok to ask for proof when someone claims to be telling them the truth. If no proof is forthcoming then it is not unreasonable to totally disregard what was claimed to be true.

I wouldn't even mind if parents told their kids "This is my Truth". "It is up to you to justify whatever Truth you decide to accept".

Yes, I had my issues with Christianity so maybe I'm being biased. I just felt as a kid, I had to accept Christianity without question.

Understandable, and a wise parent will allow their children to be free. A wise parent would also learn a great deal from a child. In my opinions. Everyone always wants to change and control everyone else, including their own children. It's what's beautiful about being free.... one can live their own life and believe whatever they wish to believe without conforming to others or trying to please others. This goes for anything, not just "religion." I don't have statistics but I'm willing to make a logical guess that most children break free and come to their own eventually anyhow. At least in the less extreme circumstances. Unfortunately, once the chains are broken from their upbringing, other adults just conform them to something else and new chains transpire.
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
“Religion should remain a private endeavor for adults,” says Giovanni Santostasi, PhD, who is a neuroscientist at Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine and runs the 10,000 person strong Facebook group Scientific Transhumanism. “An appropriate analogy of religion is that’s it’s kind of like porn—which means it’s not something one would expose a child to.”

Some Atheists and Transhumanists are Asking: Should it be Illegal to Indoctrinate Kids With Religion? | HuffPost


Make it illegal to bring kids to church until they're 18? Until they have developed some rational skepticism?
Constitutionally in the US can't do this, if we could though, would it be a good idea?

Why or why not?

View attachment 18759
Define "indoctrinate."
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
There is a huge gap between educating and indoctrinating. Perhaps that should be kept in mind when responding to this thread. The OP question is the equivalent of asking if it should be illegal to brainwash kids. It's not the same, however, as asking whether it should be illegal to merely teach the kids their parents religion.
 

Mister Silver

Faith's Nightmare
There is a huge gap between educating and indoctrinating. Perhaps that should be kept in mind when responding to this thread. The OP question is the equivalent of asking if it should be illegal to brainwash kids. It's not the same, however, as asking whether it should be illegal to merely teach the kids their parents religion.

To be honest, I don't see a distinction between teaching that there is only one true religion to a child and brainwashing that child.
 

Profound Realization

Active Member
The problem is that children are malleable. Do you think children learn on their own to be racist, or do you think it is more likely that they learn it from their religiously bigoted parents?

Adults are malleable too, our ego's are just more massive than a child's than we are willing to admit. Adults think they don't conform and are not malleable but we do and are.

2-edged sword. My father was racist. Perhaps he was enslaved by his father. I never was as a child, always intuitively knew it wasn't "right."
A friend on the other hand, his father was a racist as he gladly accepted his fathers train of thought well into his adult years. Unsure if that has changed, as we no longer associate.

Is one who calls another a racist really a racist? Is a bigot-accuser really a bigot themselves? Reverse racism, bigotry? Children tend to make less judgements.

Children have all sorts of mentors...parents, sitters, other family, teachers, other children which would essentially mean other childrens' mentors.

Nevertheless, adults and children are bombarded from all angles by other minds with different things and expected to accept or not fit in. A network of slavery, in my opinion.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
To be honest, I don't see a distinction between teaching that there is only one true religion to a child and brainwashing that child.

Essentially, it's the difference between teaching a kid to understand the idea of one true god, and training a kid to uncritically accept the idea of one true god.

A whole lot of ideologically-minded parents (including all too many religiously-minded parents) train their children to accept various ideas uncritically. I have close friends who were raised that way, and some of them are even as adults so incapable of critical thought that they have been the victims of one intellectual scam after another through-out their lives. In my opinion, their education -- or their lack of one -- was criminal.

Indoctrination can mar a kid for life -- even when they escape from or reject their original training, they often lack crucial thinking skills.
 

Mister Silver

Faith's Nightmare
Adults are malleable too.

You would be correct. Just look at how many adults voted for Trump against what could be considered better judgment.

However, children are to be protected from that which can harm them. I consider religion to be harmful to society, certainly more harmful than what little good it does as though it can outweigh the harm.

2-edged sword. My father was racist. Perhaps he was enslaved by his father. I never was as a child, always intuitively knew it wasn't "right."
A friend on the other hand, his father was a racist as he gladly accepted his fathers train of thought well into his adult years. Unsure if that has changed, as we no longer associate.

You were a lucky young child, yet not all can be as lucky as you, which you have already proven by mentioning your friend. We must find ways to protect those unlucky ones.
 

Mister Silver

Faith's Nightmare
Essentially, it's the difference between teaching a kid to understand the idea of one true god, and training a kid to uncritically accept the idea of one true god.

Still, I don't think you understand how there's really no distinction. Children look up to their parents and adult figures; children emulate them; children will adopt those ideas merely to gain love and acceptance; children do not have the mental capacity to understand that they can go against what their parents want, usually that happens at puberty, rebellion and all that jazz, but not always if it has already been too deeply ingrained.
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
Still, I don't think you understand how there's really no distinction. Children look up to their parents and adult figures; children emulate them; children will adopt those ideas merely to gain love and acceptance; children do not have the mental capacity to understand that they can go against what their parents want, usually that happens at puberty, rebellion and all that jazz, but not always if it has already been too deeply ingrained.

Perhaps I don't understand how there can be no real distinction because my mother exposed me to Christianity without indoctrinating me in it. Or perhaps it's because I had an education in which I was exposed to thousands of ideas -- including such things as the theory of evolution -- without being brainwashed into accepting them uncritically -- which is the essence of indoctrination. :)
 

Katzpur

Not your average Mormon
in·doc·tri·nate
inˈdäktrəˌnāt/
verb
  1. teach (a person or group) to accept a set of beliefs uncritically.
Critical thinking should always be encouraged, and children should be allowed to freely question religious doctrines they are taught. That said, I had no problem with parents raising children in a religious household. It's now they do it that matters. Personally, I think my parents excelled in this. I was always taught that I had a Heavenly Father who knew me personally and who loved me deeply. I was taught that I could approach Him in prayer any time I wanted, and that no concern of mine was too trivial for His ears. I was also taught that He loves people who looked and thought differently from me, and that I should respect them as I would want them to respect me. Was I indoctrinated? I don't know, but I was well-taught -- by word and by example.
 

Mister Silver

Faith's Nightmare
Perhaps I don't understand how there can be no real distinction because my mother exposed me to Christianity without indoctrinating me in it. :)

But you're also not a Christian today, correct?

Take the Duggar family, for instance, do you think those kids had a choice in thinking differently? That's how most fundamentalist religious families operate, due to the fact that they believe a war between heaven and hell is real.
 

Quintessence

Consults with Trees
Staff member
Premium Member
Well okay. But I was the one who originally used the term, so the conversation is in context of my definition and the context in which I first presented the word, which is specifically the context of forcing parents not to push religion on their kids by making it illegal, which is not a type of "force" covered under your really broad definition. It should be clear from the context I used it in that that is not the type of force I was talking about, so why try to counter my point without addressing the type of force I was referring too??

Because, quite obviously, neither of us are endowed with supernatural mind reading powers and were talking past each other?
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
But you're also not a Christian today, correct?

Not even close to being a Christian in terms of theology.

Take the Duggar family, for instance, do you think those kids had a choice in thinking differently? That's how most fundamentalist religious families operate, due to the fact that they believe a war between heaven and hell is real.

The Duggar kids were not, in my opinion, educated. They were indoctrinated. And I agree with you that's how most fundie families operate.
 

whirlingmerc

Well-Known Member
You mean like teaching kids militant atheism, funding Carl Sagan wannabes to bash opposing religious views to secularism? Better to take the high road and teach kids there are superior pleasures in following God now and later than in the alternatives

Psalm 125 - Believers are like mountains and God like mountains around that mountain.
Discussion guide week 5 - Psalm 125
 

Sunstone

De Diablo Del Fora
Premium Member
So you are theologically inclined; meaning that you adhere to a theological belief system?

No, not at all. Theologies and me don't mix. What I meant was that I might share some things with Christians -- shared values in some cases, for instance -- but I do not share their theological beliefs at all.
 
Top