dybmh
דניאל יוסף בן מאיר הירש
Because Gay people pay taxes to maintain the civil marriage licensing system.Why anyone would think Churches should be stripped from their rights to legally marry if they dont.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Because Gay people pay taxes to maintain the civil marriage licensing system.Why anyone would think Churches should be stripped from their rights to legally marry if they dont.
No, you're good...Exactly! What's good for the goose...oops...wrong choice of words, maybe?
Because Gay people pay taxes to maintain the civil marriage licensing system.
And therefore, it should be obvious, everybody should pay their taxes, and everybody should leave everybody else alone (assuming no harm, of course).Well so do people who support Churches who marry men and women only.
Because Gay people pay taxes to maintain the civil marriage licensing system.
And therefore, it should be obvious, everybody should pay their taxes, and everybody should leave everybody else alone (assuming no harm, of course).
On the other hand, though, it ought to be mentioned that those churches all are entitled to pretty generous tax breaks, and yet are privileged to discriminate in any way they see fit. Sound fair to you?
Which tells me you cannot counter his suggestion.
Erroneously.
I'm actually just pretty busy today.
On the other hand, though, it ought to be mentioned that those churches all are entitled to pretty generous tax breaks, and yet are privileged to discriminate in any way they see fit. Sound fair to you?
It's fine so long as I don't take a gander at those geese goosing each othr.Exactly! What's good for the goose...oops...wrong choice of words, maybe?
Bravo. Its too easy for some to lose track of civil rights..
It's a civil right that the Catholic Church change it's teaching on marriage, and the State dictates the Canon Law?
When did the State do that? I would like to see the ruling by the state.
Well that's what some posters here are actually advocating... That the Catholic Church either marry same sex couples, or they lose their legal right to marry entirely, as in Catholic marriages performed by clergymen would no longer be accepted as legally binding by the State.
I think it's a bad idea.
Those posters are idiots. Don't take the bait.
Does it, though?
What would be the problem with a government saying something like this?
Anyone licensed to be a marriage officiant will have to agree not to discriminate. Your priests/ministers/whatnot won't be forced to be licensed, but if they aren't licensed, then any "marriages" they perform won't have legal weight.
Those posters are idiots. Don't take the bait.
I don't understand why:
- Anyone would think Churches should be forced to marry same sex couples.
- Why anyone would think Churches should be stripped from their rights to legally marry if they dont.
I say yes. I am bisexual, and see no reason to say otherwise.
Yes, in my opinion same-sex marriage should be legally available in every country. I have attended a gay wedding before and I had a rare time. It was beautiful.
No one is harmed by gay people exercising their right to have longstanding, romantic , stable relationships - sometimes now with children, adopted or otherwise - recognised by the state. I can think of no meaningful objection to it that does not stem from, really, homophobia.
On the other hand, equally, I believe that religious believers - adhering to orthodox traditions, like Catholicism, Eastern Orthodoxy, Orthodox Judaism, Sunni & Shia Islam, Baha'i - should also have their right to a sacramental / halachic / halal marriage between opposite-sex partners, in accordance with their doctrinal beliefs, protected by law.
One freedom should not be used to deny another freedom - both gay rights and religious freedom are sacrosanct.