Maybe.
But that's how I judge the effect of Christianity on the culture at large - by how it manifests in people. You tell people that women have less value than men, and men value them less. Christian women often buy into it as well. Women helped defeat the Equal Rights Amendment.
From Helen Gardner:
"The bible teaches that a father may sell his daughter for a slave [Ex. 30:7], that he may sacrifice her purity to a mob [Judges 19:24; Gen. 19:8], and that he may murder her, and still be a good father and a holy man. It teaches that a man may have any number of wives; that he may sell them, give them away, or swap them around, and still be a perfect gentleman, a good husband, a righteous man, and one of God's most intimate friends; and that is a pretty good position for a beginning. It teaches almost every infamy under the heavens for woman, and it does not recognize her as a self-directing, free human being. It classes her as property, just as it does a sheep: and it forbids her to think, talk, act, or exist, except under conditions and limits defined by some priest."
What effect do you think that such doctrine has? None? Pro-woman?
Fallacy of false analogy. No comment was made about all Christians based on Augustine's words.
I already gave you the quote from Augustine. There are many more like it, also from prominent church fathers:
Tertullian: "You [woman] are the devil's gateway: you are the unsealer of that (forbidden) tree: you are the first deserter of the divine law: you are she who persuaded him whom the devil was not valiant enough to attack. You destroyed so easily God's image, man. On account of your desert - that is, death - even the Son of God had to die."
John Calvin: "Woman is more guilty than man, because she was seduced by Satan, and so diverted her husband from obedience to God that she was an instrument of death leading to all perdition. It is necessary that woman recognize this, and that she learn to what she is subjected; and not only against her husband. This is reason enough why today she is placed below and that she bears within her ignominy and shame."
These ideas are inconsistent with our modern understanding of women's pace in society. The issues commonly associated with notions of women's rights over the past century include, though are not limited to, the right:
to bodily integrity and autonomy
to be free from sexual violence
to vote
to hold public office
to enter into legal contracts
to have equal rights in family law
to work
to fair wages or equal pay
to obtain credit
to have reproductive rights
to own property
to education.
I seem to recall that some progressive nuns helped fight for some of these issues, but I'm pretty sure that they were rogues representing themselves and not the church.
Even today many of these issues are still contested, notably equal pay and reproductive rights." Consider the recent Hobby Lobby case that was adjudicated by the Supreme Court, where it was claimed by the Green family that their religion taught them to try to prevent women from getting contraceptives. From Wiki:
"David Green (born November 13, 1941) is an American businessman, philanthropist, and the founder of Hobby Lobby, a chain of arts and crafts stores. Green comes from a family of preachers and says he has built his business squarely on biblical principles: "We're Christians, and we run our business on Christian principles."
He's telling you how he views Christian teaching.
Another even more recent big hit for Christianity and its views on women came with the Center for Medical Progress' assault on Planned Parenthood using undercover operative. It backfired and fomented a killing spree in one of the clinics by a Robert Lewis Dear.
And even more recently, you've got the overwhelming majority of Christian evangelicals having voted for Trump despite his intensely misogynistic behavior including shaming beauty queens for their weight in the middle of the night on Twitter, storming into dressing rooms uninvited and unannounced, and his infamous comment about sexual assault of women's genitals made while laughing.
The secular community was outraged. The evangelical Christian community didn't have a problem, and voted for him over a church attending Christian woman.
I'm going to guess that no amount of evidence will have any impact on your judgment about whether Christianity is a misogynistic enterprise. It simply not an idea that most Christians are willing to countenance.
But the rest of us have no reason not to see that Christianity, like it's younger sister Islam, is systematically misogynistic. It is institutionalized misogyny, and has bee for centuries.
