Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I don't think there's any agreed upon definition for it.You are confused by what is meant by "Socialism".
so·cial·ismYou are confused by what is meant by "Socialism".
It doesn't have to be applied to all means of production. A healthy combination of social programs and capitalism can allow for a nation of people to thrive.so·cial·ism
ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun
a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
so·cial·ism
ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun
a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
To me, that definition contains the seeds of its own destruction. Because the community is "everybody" in it, and what is owned by "everybody" and therefore everybody has a say in regulating it. But that's a problem, because how each individual in that "everybody" thinks is how those goods (production, distribution and exchange) can provide what each individual wants … without any thought for what each individual is or ought to be obligated to contribute. Everybody has a claim, nobody has an obligation.so·cial·ism
ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun
a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
Or as it's more popularly called, Robbing Peter to pay Paul.so·cial·ism
ˈsōSHəˌlizəm/
noun
a political and economic theory of social organization that advocates that the means of production, distribution, and exchange should be owned or regulated by the community as a whole.
No, it's more that Peter & Paul work for the state, since it, in the nameOr as it's more popularly called, Robbing Peter to pay Paul.
Many argue that fascism has its roots in socialism or communismScandinavia is socialist, nazis were not, they were fascist
The National Socialist German Workers' Party, commonly referred to in English as the Nazi Party, and the Communist Parties (which have a higher kill count) are both socialist.
Why has socialism turned so ugly?
Well I know Nazism is far right and communism is far left. That's a big difference, no? I'd argue there are many different interpretations of Marxism.I'd wager money you can't tell us the differences between the Nazis, any of the Communist Parties, and socialism. Better than money, I'll bet you one week's thread starting. If you can't, you go one full week before you start a new thread. What do you say?
Well I know Nazism is far right and communism is far left. That's a big difference, no? I'd argue there are many different interpretations of Marxism.
Socialism certainly works in Scandinavia.
Okay, you can ban my account for a week if you like.
First thing is first. Who has the correct interpretation of Marxism? who has the correct interpretation of socialism?Don't tempt me. Is that the best you can do?
Im more educated about the spread and atrocities of Communists and Fascists, less-educated aboutDon't tempt me. Is that the best you can do?
Im more educated about the spread and atrocities of Communists and Fascists, less-educated about
state collectivism, planned economies, and class struggle.