Alien826
No religious beliefs
I'm not a Kleeborgian, but we follow some of their practices. We only probe orifices where it is made easy for us, for example where the victim is wearing a kilt and no underwear.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Software Feedback Thread
- Thread starter Debater Slayer
- Start date
I'm not a Kleeborgian, but we follow some of their practices. We only probe orifices where it is made easy for us, for example where the victim is wearing a kilt and no underwear.
I originally moved each line 3-4 indents, but after the first indented line, it dropped everything on the same indent below the first. I double spaced between each line.You guys helped with screenshots.
Toolbar in the Post Editor: Screenshots Needed
Hi, everyone, Multiple members have requested that the buttons for indenting text and creating bullet lists be reinstated in the post editor. We can do this via the admin CP, but the toolbar looks different depending on the device and size of the screen from which a user is browsing. I need...www.religiousforums.com
You
meanlikethis?orlikesomethingelse?
Test. Testing. Tested.
Test. Testing. Tested.
Test. Testing. Tested.
It retains the indents for me. I even had to outdent this paragraph back to normal positioning. I'm not sure whether this is browser-related.
I've patiently waited to raise my biggest complaint.
I want the "banging-head-against-brick-wall" emoji restored!
I want the "banging-head-against-brick-wall" emoji restored!
I thought you were going to ask for a mass-ignore feature. An emoji is unexpected!
That got a chuckle out of me...
Though after it was mentioned by another member, I think I'd actually throw a celebratory party if the 'ignore specific forum' feature was possible...
Alien826
No religious beliefs
There already is a mass ignore feature. See up at the the top right corner of your browser, or the tab you are using for RF, that little X ....?
Two issues with that:
- I would no longer be able to keep an eye I on you, and no one wants an untethered Debate Slayer
- I live in fear of the possible effects of accidentally ignoring myself.
Yeah...I too loved receiving that one.
Last edited:
Another thing I hadn't thought of in a while, but I don't think anyone has the ability to post in the forum "The Political World," where all the political DIR forums are sub-forums. I selected the political DIR sub-forums and can post in them, but not in the main Political World forum which is not a DIR forum, but it says I have insufficient privileges to post there. And since there haven't been any new posts in quite some time, I figure that's a problem for everyone else, too.
I remember asking about this in a message to the mods a while back, and I was told it had something to do with the board software being broken. So, now that the software is being upgraded and things are getting fixed, is that something that will be looked at?
I remember asking about this in a message to the mods a while back, and I was told it had something to do with the board software being broken. So, now that the software is being upgraded and things are getting fixed, is that something that will be looked at?
I just checked the admin CP, and it appears that the issue has to do with inheritance of forum permissions. If all members in the "registered" user group are allowed to post in the Political World, all of that forum's sub-forums inherit this, which means that a member of, say, "Socialist Only" will then have the ability to post in "Capitalist Only," and vice versa, because both of them are in the "registered" user group.
I'm not sure how to work around this, since the only solution I can think of right now is to set the permissions for each sub-forum individually instead of having them inherited from the Political World. This would be a major hassle and may contain unforeseen problems in turn, though, because it would entail manually setting up the permissions of every single user group for every single sub-forum of the Political World.
There are 35 user groups, 19 permission settings for each forum, and seven "Only" sections in the Political World. This means we would have to configure 35 x 19 x 7 = 4,655 manual settings in total. That would be an utter and unworkable nightmare, so I'm thinking about potential alternatives right now.
Oh well, it was just a thought. Of course, another option would be to just go back to doing it the old way, where people would voluntarily refrain from posting in a section.
VoidCat
Use any and all pronouns including neo and it/it's
The blue looks fine but why add the orange?
I'll add an Earl Grey theme where everything is grey and impractically posh.
Yes.
Where's the theme selection gone? Im stuck in the default theme and cannot test the RF theme.
It was as at the bottom of the screen with another in preferences, not there any longer
It was as at the bottom of the screen with another in preferences, not there any longer
That was dangerous. If one wasn't continually careful,
one would accidentally post in the wrong DIR. Yes,
staff made bigger commissions with all the infractions
they issued, but at the expense of the little people.
**** the old way.
Pure speculation, but I'm guessing the gray/black RF theme has been scrapped and everyone is on the Auburn University theme.