Something from Nothing

[james blunt]

It is easily debunked because very few places in the universe are absolute zero.

That statement is true after the big bang. My theory is before the big bang.

 

[ChristineM]

That statement is true after the big bang. My theory is before the big bang.

If you think you know what happened before the bb then i suggest you contact the perimeter institute and make yourself famous for knowing more than the greatest cosmological minds in the world.

 

[james blunt]

If you think you know what happened before the bb then i suggest you contact the perimeter institute and make yourself famous for knowing more than the greatest cosmological minds in the world.

I have been on many science forums, they deny it because it shows a miracle but it is the absolute answer. A singularity can be any given point of a void.

 

[Fool]

Nobody has bebunked ZpP at all. Like it or not that is the answer.


Added - here you go, debunk it then ?
View attachment 21757

sorry but even at absolute zero there is still energy and energy is a physical phenomena

In quantum field theory, the vacuum state is the quantum state with the lowest possible energy; it contains no physical particles, and is the energy of the ground state. This is also called the zero point energy; the energy of a system at a temperature of zero. But quantum mechanics says that, even in their ground state, all systems still maintain fluctuations and have an associated zero-point energy as a consequence of their wave-like nature. Thus, even a particle cooled down to absolute zero will still exhibit some vibrations.

 

[james blunt]

sorry but even at absolute zero there is still energy and energy is a physical phenomena

In quantum field theory, the vacuum state is the quantum state with the lowest possible energy; it contains no physical particles, and is the energy of the ground state. This is also called the zero point energy; the energy of a system at a temperature of zero. But quantum mechanics says that, even in their ground state, all systems still maintain fluctuations and have an associated zero-point energy as a consequence of their wave-like nature. Thus, even a particle cooled down to absolute zero will still exhibit some vibrations.

You do realise that relates to a human made vacuum on Earth ?

Space is not necessarily a vacuum, a vacuum has a boundary wall and air outside.

The energy they are talking about in a vacuum is spacial fields and cmbr that they can not remove from a vacuum.

A human made vacuum is not absolute zero I agree. However we are talking about something from nothing, nothing being any given point of a void, a singularity. My theory explains how energy was first formed in an absolute space, pre-big bang .

 

[Fool]

You do realise that relates to a human made vacuum on Earth ?

Space is not necessarily a vacuum, a vacuum has a boundary wall and air outside.

The energy they are talking about in a vacuum is spacial fields and cmbr that they can not remove from a vacuum.

A human made vacuum is not absolute zero I agree. However we are talking about something from nothing, nothing being any given point of a void, a singularity. My theory explains how energy was first formed in an absolute space, pre-big bang .

whether man made or not, if there is this god thing, then god is energy too, energy moves, vibrates.

vibration, energy, motion is a physical phenomena.

"Nothing rests; everything moves; everything vibrates."--The
Kybalion.

 

[ChristineM]

I have been on many science forums, they deny it because it shows a miracle but it is the absolute answer. A singularity can be any given point of a void.

Have you ever asked yourself why you have been barred from so many scientific forums? They are there to discuss science, not blind opinion, misrepresentation and ignorance of science.

 

[james blunt]

Have you ever asked yourself why you have been barred from so many scientific forums? They are there to discuss science, not blind opinion, misrepresentation and ignorance of science.

Do you not understand that ''science'' does not understand science?

My science conforms to all present science except I say it better and precise for ''science''.

Science is about ~95% correct in most semantics.

 

[james blunt]

whether man made or not, if there is this god thing, then god is energy too, energy moves, vibrates.

vibration, energy, motion is a physical phenomena.

"Nothing rests; everything moves; everything vibrates."--The
Kybalion.

Everything moves relative to space. Space is the absolute rest frame that does nothing but ''sit'' there all the time observing us. Space is the absolute observer and when we think of anything physical we are being the space , the observer.

 

[Fool]

Everything moves relative to space. Space is the absolute rest frame that does nothing but ''sit'' there all the time observing us. Space is the absolute observer and when we think of anything physical we are being the space , the observer.

space moves. space is a thing. a thing that can react to something else has physical attributes; such as, energy or matter. there would be no reaction if there was no physical aspect

 

[james blunt]

space moves. space is a thing. a thing that can react to something else has either physical attributes; such as, energy or matter.

Nooooo, space-time moves and curves etc, space is the background to this, the reference frame at rest.

 

[paarsurrey]

Space is not tangible, space has no physicality nor spirit, you have just described space.

Space is not tangible, space has no physicality nor spirit, you have just described space.

Please see post # 152 below:
"space is made up of energy and matter. energy and matter are physical"
Regards

 

[ChristineM]

Do you not understand that ''science'' does not understand science?

My science conforms to all present science except I say it better and precise for ''science''.

Science is about ~95% correct in most semantics.

So you you have never considered the possibility that 3.5 million + scientists are right and you, alone are wrong?

That is some ego.

Have you seen the doctor about that?

 

[james blunt]

So you you have never considered the possibility that 3.5 million + scientists are right and you, alone are wrong?

That is some ego.

Have you seen the doctor about that?

I do not need a doctor to tell the truth and not lie about science.

 

[ChristineM]

I do not need a doctor to tell the truth and not lie about science.

Correct but for making stuff up and claiming it is science science because you said so is a different matter.

I.e making claims of pre big bang.

 

[james blunt]

Correct but for making stuff up and claiming it is science science because you said so is a different matter.

I.e making claims of pre big bang.

Show me any other pre-big bang theory ?

Mine is the only one I know of.

 

[74x12]

Can consciousness come from nothing?

I don't think so. Consciousness is like a flame. Fire needs fuel, oxygen, heat.

 

[ChristineM]

Show me any other pre-big bang theory ?

Mine is the only one I know of.

Yours is not anything but personal and untutored opinion

As for showing, i have provided this theory to you at least twice, one you ignored it, once you mocked it (from lock of understanding)

 

[ChristineM]

I don't think so. Consciousness is like a flame. Fire needs fuel, oxygen, heat.

Consciousness needs nothing more than awareness, even the lowliest of animals are aware.

 

[james blunt]

Yours is not anything but personal and untutored opinion

You have shown nothing , please show where you have shown something pre-big bang?

My opinion is based on the highest logic, not drivel and subjective make believe.