McBell
Unbound
I doubt it.That would produce some interesting statistics.
Once stop and frisk was declared illegal they stopped.
Until it was declared illegal it was not considered a crime.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I doubt it.That would produce some interesting statistics.
I knew that my post was a fantasy.I doubt it.
Once stop and frisk was declared illegal they stopped.
Until it was declared illegal it was not considered a crime.
I am guessing no.So, is stop and frisk by TSA at airports unconstitutional?
People cannot legally give up some rights by contract.I am guessing no.
There is a difference though.
Those going onto an airplane are subject to search.
Read the fine print on the ticket
And being subject to search is one right that can be taken away.People cannot legally give up some rights by contract.
Some of these areas are grayer than others, & the circumstances most definitelyAnd being subject to search is one right that can be taken away.
You are subject to search whenever you enter a courthouse, police station, post office, airport....
Thank Obama for keeping it all going strong.Thank Bush for the TSA
Source
Is there any data to support this? I mean, this idea seems ridiculous to me but, anyway. Thoughts? Concerns?
I am assuming that was the idea, but with that kind of discretion, there is bound to be abuse.It was during Rudy Giuliani's time in office. Apparently it did help bring the rate of violent crime. However, I'm not sure what the protocal for stop and frisk was. Did the officer need to have resonable suspicion that the individual was up to no good?
I am assuming that was the idea, but with that kind of discretion, there is bound to be abuse.
Obama didn't create more government and government employees.Thank Obama for keeping it all going strong.
Bush is always blamed because Obama inherited policies which endure.Thank Obama for keeping it all going strong.
So it is wrong to get drugs and illegal guns off the streets? Those drugs are killing people and destroying families. Children lose their moms/dads. I have worked 5 heroin overdoes in the past month.
It is wrong to apprehend violent felons and bring them to justice, where their victims' families can finally get their day in court? It is wrong to solve murder, assault and rape cases by nabbing the suspects who committed those crimes? Until you have walked in my shoes, and had a victim's mother come up to you at the end of a court trial and hug you...
Here's a challenge for you, and until you can come up with a solution, don't say sh*t else about it... how do you stop a culture (that 5%) from being the most violent in the country? How do you stop them from dropping out of school and just running the streets? How do you stop them from abusing the government assistance programs thus causing the tax payers billions? How do you get them to want to become a law abiding citizen? How do you stop them from glorifying guns, drugs and "thug life"?
I fail to see the point in dragging out irrelevant points.Some of these areas are grayer than others, & the circumstances most definitely
rise to the level of unconstitutionality, eg, Stop-N-Frisk in public areas. But I'm not
talking so much about what government can take. Instead, I address the fact that
some rights cannot be waived contractually. (Mental fog prevents me from recalling
my specific landlordly experience with this. Otherwise, I'd offer examples.) Giving
up a "secure person" right in order to fly on a plane is permitted.
Agree wholeheartedly with the last part, Rev.Bush is always blamed because Obama inherited policies which endure.
What's odd though is that Obama's continuation of bad policies often earns
Bush criticism. The left must think our prez is quite incapable.
But to the TSA.....the problem isn't its existence, but rather how its run.
We can agree about this failure.I fail to see the point in dragging out irrelevant points.
[QUOTit="Revoltingest, post: 4898936, member: 22490"]People cannot legally give up some rights by contract.
More compelling is the extraordinary circumstance of a huge herd of people squeezed into
a flying pathogenic torture chamber which is barely held above certain death by a small air
pressure differential on a few spindly airfoils. One tiny bomblet would.....well.....you know.
I'd refuse to fly too, but it's a stay married thing.'
That It. I'm never flying.