• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Stop and Frisk

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I doubt it.
Once stop and frisk was declared illegal they stopped.
Until it was declared illegal it was not considered a crime.
I knew that my post was a fantasy.
But a guy can dream.

Btw, I considered it a crime...just not one which could be prosecuted.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
I am guessing no.
There is a difference though.

Those going onto an airplane are subject to search.
Read the fine print on the ticket
People cannot legally give up some rights by contract.
More compelling is the extraordinary circumstance of a huge herd of people squeezed into
a flying pathogenic torture chamber which is barely held above certain death by a small air
pressure differential on a few spindly airfoils. One tiny bomblet would.....well.....you know.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
And being subject to search is one right that can be taken away.
You are subject to search whenever you enter a courthouse, police station, post office, airport....
Some of these areas are grayer than others, & the circumstances most definitely
rise to the level of unconstitutionality, eg, Stop-N-Frisk in public areas. But I'm not
talking so much about what government can take. Instead, I address the fact that
some rights cannot be waived contractually. (Mental fog prevents me from recalling
my specific landlordly experience with this. Otherwise, I'd offer examples.) Giving
up a "secure person" right in order to fly on a plane is permitted.
 

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Source

Is there any data to support this? I mean, this idea seems ridiculous to me but, anyway. Thoughts? Concerns?

It was during Rudy Giuliani's time in office. Apparently it did help bring the rate of violent crime. However, I'm not sure what the protocal for stop and frisk was. Did the officer need to have resonable suspicion that the individual was up to no good?
 

Quetzal

A little to the left and slightly out of focus.
Premium Member
It was during Rudy Giuliani's time in office. Apparently it did help bring the rate of violent crime. However, I'm not sure what the protocal for stop and frisk was. Did the officer need to have resonable suspicion that the individual was up to no good?
I am assuming that was the idea, but with that kind of discretion, there is bound to be abuse. :(
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Thank Obama for keeping it all going strong. :)
Bush is always blamed because Obama inherited policies which endure.
What's odd though is that Obama's continuation of bad policies often earns
Bush criticism. The left must think our prez is quite incapable.
But to the TSA.....the problem isn't its existence, but rather how its run.
 

jeager106

Learning more about Jehovah.
Premium Member
So it is wrong to get drugs and illegal guns off the streets? Those drugs are killing people and destroying families. Children lose their moms/dads. I have worked 5 heroin overdoes in the past month.

It is wrong to apprehend violent felons and bring them to justice, where their victims' families can finally get their day in court? It is wrong to solve murder, assault and rape cases by nabbing the suspects who committed those crimes? Until you have walked in my shoes, and had a victim's mother come up to you at the end of a court trial and hug you...

Here's a challenge for you, and until you can come up with a solution, don't say sh*t else about it... how do you stop a culture (that 5%) from being the most violent in the country? How do you stop them from dropping out of school and just running the streets? How do you stop them from abusing the government assistance programs thus causing the tax payers billions? How do you get them to want to become a law abiding citizen? How do you stop them from glorifying guns, drugs and "thug life"?


Kill 'em?

Seriously I just don't know.
Jail works.
While they are in jail.
Then they get out and do it some more.
I hate to use the cliche "look at the parents", but look at the parents.
Being college educated, being a disabled copper, being addicted to alcohol, being as I met lots of
people in rehab, I can say with authority that cocaine is bad and heroin is downright epidemic.
Why?
I just don't know.
I DO know there are many, many, social factors involved.
I have three sons. 50, 46, and 17.
SEVENTEEN! How'd that happen?
My 46 year old is paroled to me after serving 6 years in prison for burglary driven by drug addiction.
He learned a very hard lesson. Hard on his father also.
He is clean and will stay clean because he WANTS to.
He knows that clean people run with clean people and he does. He's a skilled builder/carpenter now doing my home
first.
I bought him a truck, gave him tools, and he's working his butt off and attends recovery group meetings
with me.
I am proud of him.
I seriously doubt he'll relapse and I doubt I will either.
I suffer from alcoholism.
I'm in remission also and attend recovery meetings at least 5 X a week.
A profound belief in God is essential for me in recovery.
I darned near died of this illness.
Once I was in a hospital 24 hours after my last drink and still had a blood alcohol level of .40%.
I should have died.
 

McBell

Unbound
Some of these areas are grayer than others, & the circumstances most definitely
rise to the level of unconstitutionality, eg, Stop-N-Frisk in public areas. But I'm not
talking so much about what government can take. Instead, I address the fact that
some rights cannot be waived contractually. (Mental fog prevents me from recalling
my specific landlordly experience with this. Otherwise, I'd offer examples.) Giving
up a "secure person" right in order to fly on a plane is permitted.
I fail to see the point in dragging out irrelevant points.
 

YmirGF

Bodhisattva in Recovery
Bush is always blamed because Obama inherited policies which endure.
What's odd though is that Obama's continuation of bad policies often earns
Bush criticism. The left must think our prez is quite incapable.
But to the TSA.....the problem isn't its existence, but rather how its run.
Agree wholeheartedly with the last part, Rev.
 

David1967

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
[QUOTit="Revoltingest, post: 4898936, member: 22490"]People cannot legally give up some rights by contract.
More compelling is the extraordinary circumstance of a huge herd of people squeezed into
a flying pathogenic torture chamber which is barely held above certain death by a small air
pressure differential on a few spindly airfoils. One tiny bomblet would.....well.....you know.[/QUOTE]
That It. I'm never flying.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
[QUOTit="Revoltingest, post: 4898936, member: 22490"]People cannot legally give up some rights by contract.
More compelling is the extraordinary circumstance of a huge herd of people squeezed into
a flying pathogenic torture chamber which is barely held above certain death by a small air
pressure differential on a few spindly airfoils. One tiny bomblet would.....well.....you know.
'
That It. I'm never flying.
I'd refuse to fly too, but it's a stay married thing.
Mrs Revolt likes travel, & wants my company.
The best I can do is negotiate frequency, duration, & timing.
 
Top