Storm
ThrUU the Looking Glass
What Would Jesus Do.One more thing: whats WWJD? I'm not very good with abbreviations, hee hee.
Last edited:
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
What Would Jesus Do.One more thing: whats WWJD? I'm not very good with abbreviations, hee hee.
Thank you! I thought I was going mad for a moment! (well since Sunday) The worst of the situation was that it wasn't the minister that gave me a talking to it was a member of the church.
I have to agree that Jesus would be appalled if he was to walk the earth today and see what most religious "leaders" have become (or "are").
One more thing: whats WWJD? I'm not very good with abbreviations, hee hee.
The problem with using Matthew 23 is that far to many people use it out of context and even more believe that it is a command to not judge.Wow. That's unfortunate.
I'm not sure what I would've done in that situation. Maybe something involving shouting Matthew 23 at them while storming out.
Edit: or maybe quoting Romans 14:4 at them while telling them to butt out of God's business.
What Would Jesus Do.
Enlighted...one further thing... remind them of something Jesus said... "Let those without sin throw the first stone." He was speaking to Jews at the time but it makes a good argument toward anyone.
Only a moral defective could read the story of Sodom & Gomorrah and conclude that the crime was homosexuality, as opposed to gang rape.As a non-believer I do not regard the Bible or any other sacred text to be anything other than a product of the minds of men, though I doubt that's any comfort. Even so, I'd like to argue that the Bible doesn't condemn homosexuality, but it does. In Genesis, God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah because their people practiced homosexuality, sodomy to be precise, the very word is derived from Sodom.
Only a moral defective could read the story of Sodom & Gomorrah and conclude that the crime was homosexuality, as opposed to gang rape.
So what?Wrong, Lot (a "righteous man") offered his daughters to the mob so that they would leave the angels alone, which they refused.
Are you denying they were rapists, or asserting that homosexuality is worse than rape?Their crime was attempted sodomy not rape.
So what?
Are you denying they were rapists, or asserting that homosexuality is worse than rape?
You're moving the goalposts. I didn't deny the Bible condemns homosexuality.Anyway, if you're going to deny that the Bible condemns homosexuality then you've got quite a job on your hands!
You're moving the goalposts. I didn't deny the Bible condemns homosexuality.
Another reason I am struggling with this as I have a few cousins of mine who are openly gay (and I must say I am close to them so dont want to offend them in anyway by posing this question to them) and they attend church but according to my church they are living a lie, then again maybe I should just come right out and ask what their thoughts are.....