It sounds like you're pushing an "oppressed vs. oppressor"worldview, did I get that wrong?If you're trying to argue that settler-colonialism does not exist, I'm not interested in entertaining such nonsense.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
It sounds like you're pushing an "oppressed vs. oppressor"worldview, did I get that wrong?If you're trying to argue that settler-colonialism does not exist, I'm not interested in entertaining such nonsense.
Who on the planet is not living on stolen land?
That's probably as close as we might come, but as I understand it, there was always a lot of inter-tribe warring going on in aboriginal society as well.Aboriginals?
That appears to be a rhetorical question.Who on the planet is not living on stolen land?
You really can't figure it out?That appears to be a rhetorical question.
What point are you making?
You really think this isn't just being cagey,You really can't figure it out?
I think the question says exactly what the poster intended to say. Your feigned confusion just indicates you know the poster is correct you just can't admit it.You really think this isn't just being cagey,
setting up to claim a mischievous inference?
I prefer that people say what they mean,
instead of making vague allusions.
But if you know what he meant, you
could be his interpreter.
Your belief that his meaning would beYour feigned confusion just indicates you know the poster is correct you just can't admit it.
LMBO you can't figure everyone lives on stolen land. It's amazingYour belief that his meaning would be
unambiguous to others bespeaks a
lack of understanding....of both the
poster's history, & the issues.
You contribute nothing to the discussion.
You misunderstand my post.LMBO you can't figure everyone lives on stolen land. It's amazing
You know the point because you know the poster is right. No one lives on land that wasn't taken from others. It's happened over and over again throughout history and will continue.You misunderstand my post.
I never objected to that.
I asked for his intended point.
I notice that you believe it's obvious,
yet you're unable to articulate it.
I suspect dread to publicly admit
to a belief. It's safer to hint at it,
because of plausible deniability.
I know that your posts show strong beliefsYou know the point...
I did state it. You ignore it. I understand why.I know that your posts show strong beliefs
that don't allow for other viewpoints. And
that your inability to state the poster's
intended meaning means you really don't
know what it is.
You posted only the obvious superficial claim in #435.I did state it. You ignore it. I understand why.
project much?You contribute nothing to the discussion.
I notice that you won't answer the question.project much?
You really think this isn't just being cagey,
setting up to claim a mischievous inference?
I prefer that people say what they mean,
instead of making vague allusions.
But if you know what he meant, you
could be his interpreter.
I do."I prefer that people say what they mean,
instead of making vague allusions"
You should practice that..
Jealous?...more instead of worrying about your post count.
You seem to be the only person who is confusedI notice that you won't answer the question.
Why such refusal to come right out, & say
what you mean & believe?
You seem to be supporting genocide.You seem to be the only person who is confused