• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Student Protests Against Israel Are Wonderful

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
This might be our biggest point of disagreement.

When it comes to public speech I don't think we can afford to limit our speech so as to avoid "giving offense". First of all, generally speaking, I don't think offense can be given. I think taking offense is a subjective decision that the listener makes. For example, I don't find the burning of holy books to be offensive. In fact I think it can be an effective act of free speech.

Civil, free society depends on free speech.

And next, if we have to shape our public speech because we're afraid we might provoke some group, we are infantilizing that group. We can't molly-coddle religious extremists, they have to grow up.

I'm not advocating limiting free speech. I'm just pointing out that every side has its share of extremists.
 

Ignatius A

Well-Known Member
It's useful to consider what motivates terrorists.
If it's a reaction to violent oppression, then ending
this practice would solve the problem, & obviate
having to exterminate / "purge" any group.
It's true that if Hamas killed every jew on the planet that would solve their problem. Maybe that's why they have that as one of their goals.
That's a convenient assumption underlying Israel's propaganda,
ie, that the enemy must be exterminated no matter the civilian
casualties because it's such an existential threat.
It reminds me of Nazi propaganda to exterminate the Jews,
who were also supposed to be an implacable enemy.
I don't buy it.
All humans can be reasoned with if given the chance.
Israel hasn't tried that yet.
Has hamas tried it? I might have missed it.
 

We Never Know

No Slack
I'm not advocating limiting free speech. I'm just pointing out that every side has its share of extremists.

One of my favorite meme's...

Others may not like the protests, what they say, etc but.....

IMG_20240429_142137.jpg
 

icehorse

......unaffiliated...... anti-dogmatist
Premium Member
So all of your arguments about the problems with Islam were just distractions to what was obviously the problem in the first place, Human politics and locally mutual religions.
That said, how about we work on real solutions with that in mind?
Nope.

One side of the conflict is driven by Islamic Jihadis. We cannot hope to find real solutions if we ignore or soft pedal that fact.
 

Clizby Wampuscat

Well-Known Member
That's a pretty serious allegation. Can you demonstrate it to be true?
For starters here is an organization that will pay for bail or court fees in association with Israel - Hammas protests, this organization also organized the protests.
Meanwhile, the money flowing into funding the war, cracking down on protesters and using media coverage to disparage those same protesters goes completely unremarked?
Yes, it takes money to keep an angry mob in check, no one is hiding that. Some disparage themselves by calling for the death of jews, attacking jews and calling for the annihilation of Israel or do you agree with them?
 

InChrist

Free4ever
It's likely because I'm neither Christian nor Jew.
This affords me objectivity to see Muslims, Christians,
& Jews as all fellow humans. All deserve justice,
peace, & prosperity. I've no reason to see Muslims
as an implacable enemy. Nor to see Christians &
Jews as saints without flaw.
We must end the bigotry fueling this conflict.
You don’t appear to very objective or concerned about justice, peace and prosperity of Jews, Muslims and Christians if you are calling these protests on university campuses “wonderful “. Protesters have yelled things at Jewish students and professors, such as, “Go back to Poland, Kill your self” and called for the annihilation of Israel. Jewish students have been harassed on campus, sometimes having to barricade themselves inside rooms for safety. Classes have gone to only online and graduation ceremonies cancelled in some cases.
Sounds pretty bigoted to me and not like a productive way to facilitate peaceful resolution to this conflict.

“The anti-Israel demonstrations around Columbia Universityturned threatening and antisemitic Saturday night, as they have repeatedly across the country. On social media, you can find footage of crowds taunting Jewish students to “Go back to Poland!” and chanting, “We don’t want no Zionists here!” There is a masked protester with a sign that reads “Al-Qasam’s Next Target” with an arrow pointing at Jewish counterprotesters nearby. Al-Qassam is the military wing of Hamas. A protester screamed at Jewish students, “The 7th of October is going to be every day for you!”

 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
You don’t appear to very objective or concerned about justice, peace and prosperity of Jews, Muslims and Christians if you are calling these protests on university campuses “wonderful “.
I certainly won't appear objective to fanatical
Zionists who defend evil perpetrated by Jews,
& seethe with hatred & rage at Muslims. IMO.
"Objective" means their view & no other.

What's wonderful is the emerging movement to
turn around US policy, ie, stop supporting
apartheid, human rights violations, theft,
genocide, & starvation. IMO.
Protesters have yelled things at Jewish students and professors, such as, “Go back to Poland, Kill your self” and called for the annihilation of Israel. Jewish students have been harassed on campus, sometimes having to barricade themselves inside rooms for safety. Classes have gone to only online and graduation ceremonies cancelled in some cases.
Jews have yelled "Death to Arabs".
Just as the pro Palestinians' agenda isn't dismissible
because some yell wrongful things, neither should
Israel's right to exist be lost just because some of
them call for wrongful things.
Sounds pretty bigoted to me and not like a productive way to facilitate peaceful resolution to this conflict.
Bigotry abounds. But Israeli & US (largely Christian
leaders) bigotries are the deadliest of all in this conflict.

It appears that you see only bigotry in those who oppose
Israel's genocide? Is this so? Is there nothing from Jews,
from Christians, & from others who support Israel's brutal
treatment of non-Jews?
“The anti-Israel demonstrations around Columbia Universityturned threatening and antisemitic Saturday night, as they have repeatedly across the country. On social media, you can find footage of crowds taunting Jewish students to “Go back to Poland!” and chanting, “We don’t want no Zionists here!” There is a masked protester with a sign that reads “Al-Qasam’s Next Target” with an arrow pointing at Jewish counterprotesters nearby. Al-Qassam is the military wing of Hamas. A protester screamed at Jewish students, “The 7th of October is going to be every day for you!”

Your moniker suggests to me that you follow
the Prince Of Peace. Is this so?
Would he pursue genocide & starvation as a
means to defend Israel?

All you offer is one sided defense of Israel's
genocide of Palestinians, employing fault
finding of protesters & Muslims. IMO.
You should consider this.
 
Last edited:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Islam has used terrorist tactics since day one. Muhammad used terrorist tactics.
Israel was founded using terrorist tactics, eg,
bombing buildings, murder.
You cannot simply point to shortcomings on
one side, & ignore the hideous sins of those
you defend. This is bigoted apologetics.
Worse, this is to support genocide.
 

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
For starters here is an organization that will pay for bail or court fees in association with Israel - Hammas protests, this organization also organized the protests.
Is that it? A legal organization that voluntarily pay legal fees? You think that's sufficient evidence to suggest astro-turfing?

Yes, it takes money to keep an angry mob in check, no one is hiding that.
Any actual evidence about serious crimes or damage coming out of the protests?

Some disparage themselves by calling for the death of jews, attacking jews and calling for the annihilation of Israel or do you agree with them?
No.

Do you agree with the right to protest and freedom of speech? Do you agree with protests against killing civilians?

I just find it very odd that you raise the allegation of money coming in to the protests (which you have failed to demonstrate or substantiate in any way) meanwhile ignoring the extremely widely reported and understood fact that those who aggressively stand against the protest have significantly large amounts of funds coming into them, and that the protest is very explicitly about the US government funding a foreign government's military operations the tune of billions.

Seems to me that the "follow the money" argument isn't something you actually believe in. You just want to disparage the protesters.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
BBC is right now covering the increase in student
protests of USA helping Israel commit genocide.

Critics don't openly argue for genocide. They tacitly
approve of it, but are loath to admit it. So they use
disingenuous ad hominem attacks on the protestors,
eg, making writ large the bad acts of some, blaming
outside organizations, yelling "Anti-Semite!".

Genocide supporters are on the wrong side of history,
just as were supporters of the Vietnam War, & the
South's segregation.
Protesters were (& now are) the source of positive change.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member

Hamilton Hall stands in distinction for being taken over during campus anti-Vietnam demonstrations in 1968. Protesters came together outside of the building early Thursday before a small group broke off and stormed the hall.

The group Columbia University Apartheid Divest took responsibility for the Hamilton Hall storming on social media.

"This escalation represents the next generation of the 1968, 1985 and 1992 student movements which Columbia once repressed yet celebrate today," the group's message on X said. "Protesters have voiced their intention to remain at [Hamilton Hall] until Columbia concedes to CUAD's three demands: divestment, financial transparency and amnesty."

Columbia has already adamantly refused to divest from Israel, so that's going to be the major point of impasse. I don't know what financial transparency would entail, although I've observed that private organizations tend to want to keep their finances secret. So, they may not win on that point either.

Columbia might agree to amnesty, if the protesters give up now, but if this turns out to be a long-term thing, then all bets are off.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member





Columbia has already adamantly refused to divest from Israel, so that's going to be the major point of impasse. I don't know what financial transparency would entail, although I've observed that private organizations tend to want to keep their finances secret. So, they may not win on that point either.

Columbia might agree to amnesty, if the protesters give up now, but if this turns out to be a long-term thing, then all bets are off.
Columbia is going to endure continuing strife as long
as it supports Israel, apartheid, & genocide. Cracking
down on students looks likely to backfire.
 

Stevicus

Veteran Member
Staff member
Premium Member
Columbia is going to endure continuing strife as long
as it supports Israel, apartheid, & genocide. Cracking
down on students looks likely to backfire.

I just hope we don't have any incidents like Kent State. I don't expect New York to call out the national guard, but in places like Texas or Florida, I'm sure they would consider it.
 
Top