Of course, that is why we learn more and more how to improve our ability to distinguish between our own subjective reality to the objective reality.
The real goal is to understand that we cannot separate them, and that "objective reality" is not so separate from the subjective self that you can claim it is completely "true" in and of itself. You cannot know objective reality "as it is". It always, always have you, your subjective self as part of it that.
Here it is simply put. Objective reality is always a
mediated reality, science included. It always has the subjective observer embedded in any and all understandings. You always filter it into your understanding, and are never freed from those filters. It is objective,
relatively speaking, not absolutely speaking.
That's why scientists don't count eye witness as an objective evidence. we know for a fact that our interpretation of reality can easily be false.
But let's not forget about consensus reality. That is an "objective" reality because it is a collective framework shared in common by a particular mindset or worldspace. What the collective sees is reality through those collective filters, and that becomes objective truth to those within that collective.
Once you step outside that into another shared worldspace with their own filters, sets of assumptions and languages to describe, or model the world, the world has different truths to them. And those truths are perfectly adequate for them to function, and is their "objective reality" as well. And so it goes, each thinking their consensus reality is "the reality".
That's why when you want to make a scientific theory, it is not enough to say: because i know, or because million of people saw it.
That's why you can't just make any claim you want without having an objective way of proving it, unlike some non-scientific theories, that offer a non-objective realities.
And this is valid, for a scientific worldspace. But there are other very real realities that are both before, and beyond scientific understandings. And each of those also has their own criteria for "objective" truth, even though they differ in nature. Even though a prerational, prescientific mythic reality falls short of a scientific reality, it is not without its own consistent logic proofs. They just are not scientific proofs.
That doesn't make then not perfectly real to those within those worldspaces. Obviously they are, considering as a system it has been perfectly functional, up to the limits of its capacities. Once that limit is reached, then you grown beyond it to the next level, the next higher worldspace, such as the scientific reality. But then, that too has it's limits, and that is the problem presented in your OP.
Would you say for example if someone claims the sun will burnout it 10 days because angels told him so, and someone will claim it appears we have billions of years (and provide the long explanation), would you say they are both in the same level of understanding the objective reality?
I would qualify it to say a scientific reality. Obviously what they are saying is not a scientific reality. But is that reality the only, one true reality, "The Truth", in other words? If you say yes, then you should realize that is exactly the same thinking they have of their reality. How is your truth absolute, when their absolute truth isn't? Are you so sure you actually are truly objective, and not mistaking the relative nature of perception with objective truth? How do you think you can truly bypass these things.
Furthermore, what successes science has, is in fact extraordinarily narrow in the grand scheme of things. There are a whole lot of promissory notes being issued that all Answers can come this way, using those tools. That is "logical positivism" and that belief is sadly weak.
To realize the relative nature of truth and the limits of our perceptions to hold truth. To know yourself, is to know reality, and that reality is that we are perceivers of truth from multiple perspectives, with not one being absolute. You end up holding life with a far more light, opened hand, rather than trying to put a wrapper around it with a big T Truth emblazoned on it in order to tell yourself you have it figured out.
Only when i started to learn about the objective reality, i could understand how my reality so far, has been mostly based on subjective ideas (of my own, and others).
You are mistaking subjectivity, with mythologies. This is an error on your part. You are the perceiver of all things, filtered through the conditioned filters of your mind programmed into you through culture and language.
Can you please explain how can one be self-unaware? ( i assume you mean ignoring how one feels about something?)
Subjectivity has little to do with emotions. How someone can be self-unaware is simple. They spend their whole lives looking from truth outside themselves. They never introspect. They hope to find the eyes they are looking out through by searching for them out there in the world, in "objective reality" somewhere, never realizing they are looking out through them the whole time. The truth is in you, not "out there".
I Agree with you, that everything we feel is obviously subjective, but not an objective reality
Well, that's actually not true either. First of all, everything you think, is subjective reality. It's not just feelings. But, and here's where it gets really fun, if you have a thought about yourself, then you have made a 1st person subjective self, a 3rd person objective reality.
You can turn subject, the one seeing, into the one seen. So you the seer, are seeing you the seer as the thing seen, which is no longer the subject by an object that the subject sees. In your 3rd person perspective of the 1st person self, it's the 1st person holding a 3rd person perspective of the 1st person - which makes it not a true 1st person experience. It's a 1st person experience of a 3rd person perspective of a 1st person viewed as an object.
So tell me that didn't make your brain melt into a puddle on the floor.
Trust me, there is more to reality that what your mind assumes it can find "out there". A whole lot more. There are very clear limits to where the empiric analytic sciences can take you, just like the mythic realities had ceilings on their reality.
