to me this comes adross as pointing to one's own attachment and desire...
However, if you put it in general terms, it becomes victim blaming when crime is involved, very much in the way Muslims blame victims or even Buddhists do, if @Conscious thoughts has it right.
If you suffer because someone else makes you suffer, the last thing you want to hear is "you yourself are to be blamed for it".
In times of suffering that is inflicted by others, people have a lot lot of work to do in processing what has happened.
Snide remars such as "you yourself are to be blamed for it" worsen everything, in my view.
People that already suffer, suffer twice because of these "very wise" remarks issued by their enivronment....
But maybe I got you wrong.
At any rate, Jesus set an example of suffering without being guilty, that's my view of the Bible story.
Read my posts about the difference between pain and suffering. One can inflict pain. As I see it, it is the person themselves that inflicts suffering upon themselves as a result of attachment to that pain.
Again, I am speaking of duhkha when I’m speaking of suffering, as there is really no better translation from Sanskrit to English for the term than suffering.