Capitalism is a service to self. The focus is on profiting off of another. It isn't about love. You can't serve two masters. Your contempt towards love is again duly notedCapitalism is human freedom. Your ignorance is noted.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Capitalism is a service to self. The focus is on profiting off of another. It isn't about love. You can't serve two masters. Your contempt towards love is again duly notedCapitalism is human freedom. Your ignorance is noted.
Before I formed you in the womb I knew you.
Yes, it is biblical.
Yes, a calling
So do cars, but not usually by intent.
Guns are a tool. Violence is a human choice.
This question is not just about abortion but also any other freedom that considerably affects specific groups' well-being, health, or safety.
If you are a conservative, liberal, or otherwise and you oppose, say, the legalization of elective abortion, right to proselytize or openly practice one's religion (which is banned in some countries, such as Saudi Arabia, for all but the majority religion), or same-sex marriage, how do you square that with having friends who may be negatively affected by such legislation?
For example, I have conservative friends who have told me that knowing me has changed their views on apostasy: whereas they previously believed that apostates should face capital punishment, knowing one on a personal level has added a layer to their views on the issue that they didn't consider before. They changed their mind when the issue no longer became a mere distant abstraction to them.
So, if you support or oppose certain things such as the above and know someone who falls into a category of people who will be affected by them, do you take into consideration the effects of said views or a vote based on them on your friend, acquaintance, etc.? How do you address the knowledge that they may be harmed by something you endorse?
Capitalism is a service to self. The focus is on profiting off of another. It isn't about love. You can't serve two masters. Your content towards love is again duly noted
This quote speaks to the spirit. Not to the form in the womb. The form doesn't get a spirit until it takes the breath of life. The form may never become spirited, aliveBefore I formed you in the womb I knew you.
Yes, it is biblical.
Yes.
If my neighbor on my right attacks me I have no right to attack my neighbor on the left.
This quote speaks to the spirit. Not to the form in the womb. The form doesn't get a spirit until it takes the breath of life. The form may never become spirited, alive
"it is part of the culture of death pushed on us by the left" deosn't strike me as similar to anti-abolitionist rhetoric in any fashion. We must have encountered different anti-slavery material.Yes, just like abolitionist rhetoric against slavery. The innocent should be protected from the killers.
Yes, God's will or selfish. Today is set before you to choose God's will or self'sAll capitalist transactions are voluntary.
This one of the things that changed my mind with regard to legalization of marijuana. When I was younger I had no idea that there were so many people we put in prison because of using or selling weed. When I learned that, and also I think when I was exposed to more people who smoked pot, my attitude certainly softened.
I recall similar statistics with regard to attitudes about gay marriage and whether or not people actually know someone gay in their personal lives.
"it is part of the culture of death pushed on us by the left" deosn't strike me as similar to anti-abolitionist rhetoric in any fashion. We must have encountered different anti-slavery material.
I think you're wrong about abortion and that the anti-abortion position was thoroughly discredited decades ago. But just for clarity,
- a feotus isn't a person
- pro choice isn't limited to the left
- it was the anti-choice side who bombed abortion clinics, murdered doctors and nurses, harrassed and intimidated patients.
I would rather we could have this debate without accusing the other side of being death cultists. I believe that you're motivated by love. I am too.
Ok so killing you wife is ok.
Or forcing her to live a life constantly remanded of violence and misery.
Sorry, i just don't see your rational.
God knows the spirit because God is spirit. You were told to worship in spirit and glorify God in your body. God, the eternal spirit doesn't have an exact form. Your spirit doesn't have to have a form. You are a materialist. You don't believe in godIf God knows you, you are a person.
Killing an innocent person on purpose is murder.
More divisive rhetoric.Leftist gibberish attempting to avoid addressing the brutal slaughter of babies in the womb.
Then call that person 'Mother'But isn't that what a mother is doing? Hosting a wayfarer? A sojourner? Helping someone on a journey by providing them shelter and nourishment?
"it is part of the culture of death pushed on us by the left" deosn't strike me as similar to anti-abolitionist rhetoric in any fashion. We must have encountered different anti-slavery material.
I think you're wrong about abortion and that the anti-abortion position was thoroughly discredited decades ago. But just for clarity,
- a feotus isn't a person
- pro choice isn't limited to the left
- it was the anti-choice side who bombed abortion clinics, murdered doctors and nurses, harrassed and intimidated patients.
I would rather we could have this debate without accusing the other side of being death cultists. I believe that you're motivated by love. I am too.
Abortion kills the innocent.
It is part of the culture of death pushed on us by the left.
It treats human beings as tools to be used.
The gun industry is a billion dollar death cult.The abortion industry is a billion dollar death cult.