tytlyf
Not Religious
Nope, both parties aren't even close to being the same. But I see this line repeated by most conservatives as to deflect from their own people they vote for.Unfortunately BOTH parties play the same game.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Nope, both parties aren't even close to being the same. But I see this line repeated by most conservatives as to deflect from their own people they vote for.Unfortunately BOTH parties play the same game.
That really wasn't the point I was trying to make, which is this: when we take the words and actions of Trump and compare them to those of Jesus (or Moses or Mohammed, etc.), it's really quite obvious that they are pretty much polar-opposites. Therefore, between endorsing the words and actions of Jesus versus endorsing the words and actions of Trump, so many chose the latter.Some are and some are not. Same with Clnton. Sometimes my actions and words are not as Christian as I would like them to be.
No. Opposition? Sure. Obstructionists? No. That is the game plan masterminded and deployed by Republicans during Obama's tenure. That unwavering intensisty of obstruction was relatively rare before.Unfortunately BOTH parties play the same game. The party not in power automatically becomes obstructionists, and the nations suffers.
No. Opposition? Sure. Obstructionists? No. That is the game plan masterminded and deployed by Republicans during Obama's tenure. That unwavering intensisty of obstruction was relatively rare before.
I don't know who started it and neither do you but it was in play long before Obama became president and it gets worse every year. Even if the Republican did start it, and you can't prove they did, the Dems have gladly joined in, and it has gotten to the ridiculous stage since Trump was elected.
Republicans wanted Obama to fail from day 1. Even the top RW media opinionheads hoped he failed. Their goal was to make him a 1-term president, it failed.I don't know who started it and neither do you but it was in play long before Obama became president and it gets worse every year. Even if the Republican did start it, and you can't prove they did, the Dems have gladly joined in, and it has gotten to the ridiculous stage since Trump was elected.
And Democrats wanted Trump to fail from day 1.Republicans wanted Obama to fail from day 1. Even the top RW media opinionheads hoped he failed. Their goal was to make him a 1-term president, it failed.
The parties are different, don't compare democrats to republicans. You can keep your corporate policies, we work for the middle class
And you have documentation of Democrats saying that their goal was to do this?And Democrats wanted Trump to fail from day 1.
Their goal is impeachment.....not even letting him have 1 full term.
This seems the normal way of things now.
There has been much in the news.And you have documentation of Democrats saying that their goal was to do this?
There is talk of impeachment now with evidence of impropriety mounting.There has been much in the news.
An example....
It’s the Beginning of the End for Trump. Even Elected Democrats Can Feel It.
But my intent was to point out to the other poster that his perception
of opposition to Obama could be easily applied to Trump.
(He sees opposition as either malevolent (when against Dems) or
noble (when against Pubs). While I see opposition as ordinary.)
The campaign to impeach President Trump has begunThere is talk of impeachment now with evidence of impropriety mounting.
I am referring your claim that they wanted him to fail from Day 1.
Where is the documentation that Pubs conspired to obstruct Obama?I agree that opposition is ordinary. But I think the obstruction we saw from Republicans was a new level.
The republican establishment is more Trump's problem. Don't fall for the 'democratic' distraction.And Democrats wanted Trump to fail from day 1.
Their goal is impeachment.....not even letting him have 1 full term.
This seems the normal way of things now.
Letting Trump go unchecked would not only be ridiculous but also dangerous.
Republicans wanted Obama to fail from day 1. Even the top RW media opinionheads hoped he failed. Their goal was to make him a 1-term president, it failed.
The parties are different, don't compare democrats to republicans.
Why are you telling me to not do something you are doing? Of course I'm going to compare them. That is how to know which one is less corrupt that he other one.
You can keep your corporate policies, we work for the middle class
You have been listening to and believing the LW opinionheads so long, the truth has escaped you.
Who did Obama make his first speech to after leaving office? How much was he paid. How much do you think he contributed to helping he middle class? You don't even know it was mainly the middle class that elected Trump and mainly because of the failures of the Obama administration.
Get a puppy to pet and in 8 years you might feel better,
Have + day
And you have documentation of Democrats saying that their goal was to do this?
I'll agree that this is indicative of the sentiments of many Democrats, but I was talking about elected officials. There will always be those fired up partisans on either side, but it is the behavior of the Congressmen that is the source of governmental opposition or obstruction.
Where is the documentation that Pubs conspired to obstruct Obama?
The context of the conversation was whether this was an agenda from Day 1.It was in the fair and balanced news last week. it was said by 3 democrat members of congress. I am sure even the drive by media reported that.
What I see in the news is that some Dems are urging caution about calling for impeachment.I'll agree that this is indicative of the sentiments of many Democrats, but I was talking about elected officials. There will always be those fired up partisans on either side, but it is the behavior of the Congressmen that is the source of governmental opposition or obstruction.
Those 2 statements can also be read as fighting Obama's agenda, rather than the man himself."Here’s John Boehner, the likely speaker if Republicans take the House, offering his plans for Obama’s agenda: “We're going to do everything — and I mean everything we can do — to kill it, stop it, slow it down, whatever we can.”
"Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellsummed up his plan to National Journal: “The single most important thing we want to achieve is for President Obama to be a one-term president.” sauce
Are you not familiar with "check and balances' in our system? Letting any president go unchecked would be ridiculous and dangerous.
The context of the conversation was whether this was an agenda from Day 1.
As for it cropping up now, well, there's some serious allegations against the president. We still need to wait and see what all the various investigations conclude, but should they be verified, impeachment ought to be considered. That's not partisan politics. That's responsible government.