Why should they? You are one among millions who experienced the pandemic and vaccines, and have stated 'you do not care.'No one interviewed me but that's fine.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Why should they? You are one among millions who experienced the pandemic and vaccines, and have stated 'you do not care.'No one interviewed me but that's fine.
"Snort! Snort! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!"Watch this all the way through… all 3 hours of it… and then let me know what you think…
I don't care anymore. I used to but not now.Why should they? You are one among millions who experienced the pandemic and vaccines, and have stated 'you do not care.'
You can look it up if you care to do so. It was many years ago for me and frankly, I don't want to look it up for you.That is a problem using your anecdotal 'personal' experience to evaluate academic sources and data concerning the nature of the pandemic and the related vaccines.
'Black Box' references are are not objective, and smells like Fundamentalist Christian invented negative use of 'Black Box.' Still have not explained your use of 'Black Box' label(?) in any constructive meaningful way.
Look up what?!!?!?!You can look it up if you care to do so. It was many years ago for me and frankly, I don't want to look it up for you.
Black box label. It is not part of some crazy right wing anything. Actually though it is a label, I think the correct terminology is "black box warning."Look up what?!!?!?!
The use of the term 'Black Box is historically a creation of fundamentalist anti-science view.Black box label. It is not part of some crazy right wing anything. Actually though it is a label, I think the correct terminology is "black box warning."
I had never had any reaction to any sort of medication. Period. I took it because the side effects were rare.The use of the term 'Black Box is historically a creation of fundamentalist anti-science view.
I still question you taking a medicine with a 'black box' warning? label?
The use of the term 'Black Box is historically a creation of fundamentalist anti-science view.
I still question you taking a medicine with a 'black box' warning? label?
"Snort! Snort! ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ!!!!"
Not a chance in hell without at least a summary, in fact less because experience with dropped in long videos is so frequently useless if ever useful that it isn't even a justifiable use of spare time.Watch this all the way through… all 3 hours of it… and then let me know what you think…
No, it is just a term for a define able process when you don't know how it works internally.The use of the term 'Black Box is historically a creation of fundamentalist anti-science view.
I still question you taking a medicine with a 'black box' warning? label?
That is nice, but just your saying it is not justification for three hours of my time.
I disagree, old meanings have long ago faded, The idea that the Black Box not knowing how something works internally is recently far more commonly used in an anti-science perspective as @Kathryn is using it as science does not know how medicines work in the same context like against evolution.No, it is just a term for a define able process when you don't know how it works internally.
I'm sure it has gained perjorative uses but originally no,
Well that is actually the original meaning of an unknown process. That science deniers misuse it to excuse their cognitive disonance is a function of that. The black box label is just a warning label that has the same name.I disagree, old meanings have long ago faded, The idea that the Black Box not knowing how something works internally is recently far more commonly used in an anti-science perspective as @Kathryn is using it as science does not know how medicines work in the same context like against evolution.
I am afraid it cannot be summarised as each message builds on the next, and if I were to summarise I would certainly muddy the waters and dilute the conclusion people come to. If you don’t want to listen to the whole thing, I don’t blame you, but I don’t want to debate this topic with people who don’t have the whole story, as this guy is explaining things in a way I could never do justice myself (I know my own weaknesses and when I have been beaten , and I, for one, am not afraid to admit to it).That is nice, but just your saying it is not justification for three hours of my time.o
And rather than a summary you give us a platitude from a self help guru. LOL
I am not against evolution or medicine for the record.I disagree, old meanings have long ago faded, The idea that the Black Box not knowing how something works internally is recently far more commonly used in an anti-science perspective as @Kathryn is using it as science does not know how medicines work in the same context like against evolution.
Never mind, I watched 30 sec, long enough to see that this was going to be at best an infomercial and that the person wasI am afraid it cannot be summarised as each message builds on the next, and if I were to summarise I would certainly muddy the waters and dilute the conclusion people come to. If you don’t want to listen to the whole thing, I don’t blame you, but I don’t want to debate this topic with people who don’t have the whole story, as this guy is explaining things in a way I could never do justice myself (I know my own weaknesses and when I have been beaten , and I, for one, am not afraid to admit to it).
I agree. I didn't even know about cognitive dissonance or whatever. I'm just using the terminology that is commonly used.Well that is actually the original meaning of an unknown process. That science deniers misuse it to excuse their cognitive disonance is a function of that. The black box label is just a warning label that has the same name.