• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Suppression of Free Speech on Covid

Argentbear

Well-Known Member
Sen. Ron Johnson, R-Wis., is asking two federal health agencies to review new data from the government of the Czech Republic on mortality rates from COVID-19 vaccines.

Johnson—who has conducted oversight into the government’s handling of the pandemic—wrote Wednesday to Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Dr. Robert M. Califf as well as Dr. Mandy K. Cohen, director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

“The Czech data evidences the Moderna COVID-19 vaccine (Spikevax) increased all-cause-mortality (ACM), as measured over a 12-month period from the time of vaccination for every age, compared to the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine (Comirnaty),” Johnson writes in the letter to Califf and Cohen, a copy of which was obtained by The Daily Signal.

Senator Ron Johnson of Wisconsin voted against the Families First Corna Virus Response Act saying it didn't matter how many people the virus kills.

He argued against vaccinations for people under the age of 21 claiming that no one under the age of 21 has ever contracted Covid.

He demanded the representatives from the FDA appear before his senate committee to explain why the FDA declined to approve veterinary medication for use in humans.

In December 2021 he claimed that Listerine mouthwash cures people infected with Covid 19.

He claimed that anyone who had recovered form Covid 19 and then receives a vaccination are 900 times more likely to die

I will bet any amount that the "Czech data" he is referring to doesn't say anything at all like what he is claiming./
 

Argentbear

Well-Known Member
Lets see. the copy of the letter written by undersecretary GIlbert Cisneros details how data from Defense Medical Epidemiology Database was corrupted of the years 2016 to 2020 and that data after 2022 is not corrupted and accurate. You Navy person there is lying about the validity of the data and then lying about Cisneros acknowledging the marked rise in key diseases following Covid Vaccinations. The corrected DMED data shows that various increases in medical conditions were not from the Covid 19 Vaccination as the reports of these increases came prior to the introduction of the vaccine and were in fact the result of contracting Covid 19.
 

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
Not that hard to identify garbage really
Just look for the RF short bus and their psychotic opinions.

cef84ec03d41f88a.png
 
Last edited:

We Never Know

No Slack
Have you all forgotten GOF(gain of function) research was reinstated less than two years(Dec 2017) before the Covid outbreak?

"Today, the National Institutes of Health announced that it is lifting a funding pause dating back to October 2014 on gain-of-function (GOF) experiments involving influenza, SARS, and MERS viruses"



 

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
Thanks for the fine example of garbage
Do you think that the idea that Fauci was the highest paid federal employee is garbage, or are you unable to actually identify any actual "garbage"?

Have you all forgotten GOF(gain of function) research was reinstated less than two years(Dec 2017) before the Covid outbreak?

Dr. Robert Redfield, former director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), testified how science indicates COVID-19 infections were likely the result of an accidental lab leak in Wuhan. His conclusion is based on the biology of the virus itself and unusual actions in and around Wuhan in 2019, including gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).

Nicholas Wade—the former science and health editor at the New York Times, and former editor of Science and Naturetestified how Drs. Fauci and Collins used unverified data to dismiss the lab leak theory in favor of natural transmission.

 

Argentbear

Well-Known Member
Do you think that the idea that Fauci was the highest paid federal employee is garbage, or are you unable to actually identify any actual "garbage"?
What does that have to do with a junk science report written by a Professor of Applied Linguistics, Okinawa Christian University.

Well it's got nothing to do with anything but is a pretty lame attempt to distract from the garbage posts you keep putting up here
Dr. Robert Redfield, former director of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), testified how science indicates COVID-19 infections were likely the result of an accidental lab leak in Wuhan. His conclusion is based on the biology of the virus itself and unusual actions in and around Wuhan in 2019, including gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
His actual statement was "
Based on my initial analysis of the data, I came to believe—and still believe today—that it
indicates COVID-19 infections more likely were the result of an accidental lab leak
than the result of a natural spillover event."

Which is a long way from science indicates.

Is there actual evidence that the virus is man made? No
Is there evidence that this Wuhan lab was experimenting with Covid 19. No
Is there actual evidence that there was a lab accident? No
Did he present anything that could be verified? No

Is this guy giving an opinion? Yes he is.

Is this another attempt at distraction on your part? I'm of the opinion it is.
Nicholas Wade—the former science and health editor at the New York Times, and former editor of Science and Naturetestified how Drs. Fauci and Collins used unverified data to dismiss the lab leak theory in favor of natural transmission.

The interesting thing here is that all of Wade's claims about the origin of Covid19 can't be verified either.
 

Ebionite

Well-Known Member
What does that have to do with
It's obvious what the context is, just as it's obvious that your opinion is worthless.

Getting back to the nanotech:

In addition to cellular toxicity, our findings reveal numerous —on the order of 3~4 x106 per milliliter of the injectable—visible artificial self-assembling entities ranging from about 1 to 100μm,or greater,of many different shapes. There were animated worm-like entities, discs, chains, spirals, tubes, right-angle structures containing other artificial entities within them, and so forth. All these are exceedingly beyond any expected and acceptable levels of contamination of the COVID-19 injectables,and incubation studies revealed the progressive self-assembly of many artifactual structures. As time progressed during incubation,simple one-and two-dimensional structures over two or three weeks became more complex in shape and size developing into stereoscopically visible entities in three-dimensions. They resembled carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons, and tapes, some appearing as transparent,thin,flat membranes, and others as three-dimensional spirals, and beaded chains.


Pfizer COVID19 microchips. Magnification 400x (Dr Joseph Sansone)

pfizer_nanotech.jpg
 
Last edited:

Argentbear

Well-Known Member
It's obvious what the context is, just as it's obvious that your opinion is worthless.

Getting back to the nanotech:

In addition to cellular toxicity, our findings reveal numerous —on the order of 3~4 x106 per milliliter of the injectable—visible artificial self-assembling entities ranging from about 1 to 100μm,or greater,of many different shapes. There were animated worm-like entities, discs, chains, spirals, tubes, right-angle structures containing other artificial entities within them, and so forth. All these are exceedingly beyond any expected and acceptable levels of contamination of the COVID-19 injectables,and incubation studies revealed the progressive self-assembly of many artifactual structures. As time progressed during incubation,simple one-and two-dimensional structures over two or three weeks became more complex in shape and size developing into stereoscopically visible entities in three-dimensions. They resembled carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons, and tapes, some appearing as transparent,thin,flat membranes, and others as three-dimensional spirals, and beaded chains.


Pfizer COVID19 microchips. Magnification 400x (Dr Joseph Sansone)

View attachment 96959
So this community college linguist professor is saying that somehow a pharmaceutical company has managed to create nanotechnology that actually works, a societal changing technology tht can usher in a new ear of prosperity for the entire world and....this is what they decide to do with it....
 

Pogo

Well-Known Member
It's obvious what the context is, just as it's obvious that your opinion is worthless.

Getting back to the nanotech:

In addition to cellular toxicity, our findings reveal numerous —on the order of 3~4 x106 per milliliter of the injectable—visible artificial self-assembling entities ranging from about 1 to 100μm,or greater,of many different shapes. There were animated worm-like entities, discs, chains, spirals, tubes, right-angle structures containing other artificial entities within them, and so forth. All these are exceedingly beyond any expected and acceptable levels of contamination of the COVID-19 injectables,and incubation studies revealed the progressive self-assembly of many artifactual structures. As time progressed during incubation,simple one-and two-dimensional structures over two or three weeks became more complex in shape and size developing into stereoscopically visible entities in three-dimensions. They resembled carbon nanotube filaments, ribbons, and tapes, some appearing as transparent,thin,flat membranes, and others as three-dimensional spirals, and beaded chains.


Pfizer COVID19 microchips. Magnification 400x (Dr Joseph Sansone)

View attachment 96959
wow, crystals. I bet they have resonant frequencies.
 
Top