Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I know how it spreads. I was asking you, based on your previous comment, which belied a misunderstanding of how COVID is spread.
How Does Coronavirus Spread?
How does COVID-19 spread? See all the ways coronavirus can be transmitted and how people can help flatten the curve.www.webmd.com
Too bad for him. His employer has every right to protect it's employees and customers. And should, if they value them. Notice how you didn't address that point.
Uh, no. That's sexual harassment. Not the same thing AT ALL.
Still is. Your son could get vaccinated and go to work. Or quit, and find a job that doesn't require vaccination. Those are his CHOICES he still has.
Oops, you've gone off the rails. This makes zero sense.
Absolutely false, so I don't know what you pulled that out of, but I do have a theory.
As one who taught a political science course for 25 years, I had to look at things from an unbiased viewpoint as best as I could. To check and see if I was successful in being even-handed, I had my students fill out a confidential survey and had a student collect and mix them at the end of a semester.
Fits my split personality.
Which one is Dr. Jekyll and which one is Mr. Hyde?
The WHO is. And that's the source I provided for you. Good grief.
I made no such assumption. What I have done is continually ask you for further information that you have repeatedly failed to provide. In response, you've thrown out quippy remarks that provide no information.
Healthcare practitioners have to be up-to-date on all vaccinations, including flu vaccinations. AT least, where I live. There is definitely a point to it.
Physical violence? What are you going on about??
Unfortunately he has bought into conspiracy theory nonsense and of course he does not apply the same standards to his beliefs as he does to others. When it comes to forced vaccinations that is quite often decided by the employer. An employer does have that right. He may not understand it, but an employer could conceivably be sued if an employee was a vector of a disease that is controllable. No one is forcing people to work at those jobs so he has no complaints there. This site is a bit out of date, it is pre-Covid, but you can see different state requirements for different vaccines for different health care facilities. There is no "one size fits all" law. For example hospitals with maternity wards quite often have state laws that say that workers have to get a rubella vaccine:
I fail to see how what I posted was supposedly a "broad brush statement", especially since I don't use stereotypes.
Where did I supposedly assume that? What I judged is your support for a former president who is clearly a danger to our democracy and is immoral and dishonest on multiple counts. The fact that you can't even see that is quite troubling from any Judeo-Christian perspective.
I don't think sin is "highly subjective".
So, this is an excuse to ignore what Trump and many of his supporters have done? That's not what Jesus taught. Maybe reread the Sermon On the Mount and then Jesus' Parable of the Sheep & Goats.
They won't admit that they have anything to do with me.
Yes. I told you that: "Vetted experts are a much more reliable source of facts than "ordinary people." People pay them for their expertise"
The evangelicals voted for him to criminalize abortion. Those are your one-issue voters.
Your son wasn't entitled to his job. Work has to be mutually agreeable. His boss has no duty to keep him on once he won't meet the requirements for the job. Of course, it wasn't coercion. either, nor oppression nor tyranny as many like to call not being able to do whatever they like. Coercion is "the practice of persuading someone to do something by using force or threats." His boss simply didn't want him on the premises unvaccinated even if he would have been willing to work for free.
And she's right. NOBODY was forced to get vaccines except some minor children who were literally held down and injected against their protestations. Everybody else either took one voluntarily or refused the vaccine.
Now THAT is coercion by the definition above, since the use of force is implied, but even then, people have the freedom to get abortions elsewhere, and they are. People in Missouri are going to Ilinois for their abortions:
I find Biden a danger to our Republic. I also see Trump as a danger to our Republic. I hope that Congress can tow the line and prevent that from happening.
They won't admit that they have anything to do with me.
Are you a Marxist Communist? Socialist? Atheist totalitarian?
Har har .. and what is it about "Ad Hom Fallacy" did you not understand.
No links, yet you use statistics that scream for links. So I searched using your acronym. Nothing. So I wrote it out without the abbreviation. Again, that phrase does not turn up in studies that I could find. That is a very bad sign for your claim. But I did find this:The "Failed Conspiracy theorist" goes over some studies in peer reviewed journals .. so never mind him but, do mind the studies presented
Now look friend -- I know you have some hurtebutt because your necessary illusion delusion bubble was challenged .. and can not understand why beloved Gov't and various Health care institutions would like .. and you do not understand the science at all .. but you do not need to understand the science friend .. your problem is not understanding basic logic - logical fallacy - what constitutes a valid argument.
Now -- crying out "John Hopkins said the vax is safe and effective" is what we call "Appeal to authority Fallacy" and this in no way shows that your claim is true .. KK !?
Now listen up .. the main metric by which "Safety" is measured - SAR - Severe Adverse Reaction. .. u understand ? "Main Metric" somethign by which we can "Measure" whether the Jab is safe or not.
What is the SAR for the mRNA vaccines -- Moderna - Pfizer .. many studies combine and average the two .. if you don't wish to accept the value you have been given .. a Stat that you requested crying out "I want the Statistics" That number was 1 in 800 -- was a combined average Moderna-Pfizer.
You claim the Vax is "Safe" .. as does most every other Gov't - Health site on the continent .. I have told yo uthat 1 in 800 SAR is not "Safe" not by any stretch of the imagination. You can not handle this reality .. and so engage in all kinds of fallacious nonsense trying to avoid reality .. that Beloved Gov't has been lying to you .. crying out "Conspiracy, Conspiracy" If you don't like my numbers .. then provide your own .. This should be readilly available .. and were those laughable Gov't sources you love have any credibility what so ever .. they will advise you what the SAR is no the pill you are talking .. so should be real easy to find .. perhaps look further into the John Hopkins site .. see if they ever justify the Gov't propaganda trope they .. and most other Health institutions post .. and of course then you posted it as well .. falling hook - line and sinker .. because you don't understand what a valid argument is .. nor scientific proof and how it works .. which is not " Doctor said so it must be true"
Metrics you see .. in science we measure things .. u understand "Measure" .. that is how you show a claim true or false. And just because the guy showing you findings from a Journal article is a "Conspiracy theorist .. or a moron .. or a fool" does not make the findings of the journal article false .. has no bearing on it in fact .. Thinking Ad Hom Fallacy has merit is what is foolish .... and so enough of that .. and lets get to the measurement.
What is the SAR of the Jab you think you are justified to force on everyone else .. the jab which is not safe .. and certainly not effective .. not effective at preventing transmission .. nor effective in reducing risk of harm unless one is severely immune compromized and already near deaths door.
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
I choose not to argue with fanatics. Doesn’t mean I’m triggered.
The point is that you're confusing fact with opinion. Anyone can assert facts, and being an expert adds nothing to that.
No links, yet you use statistics that scream for links. So I searched using your acronym. Nothing. So I wrote it out without the abbreviation. Again, that phrase does not turn up in studies that I could find. That is a very bad sign for your claim. But I did find this:
Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults - PubMed
The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes. These analyses will require public release of participant level datasets.
Just in case the title does not come up:
"Serious adverse events of special interest following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in randomized trials in adults"
" Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95 % CI -0.4 to 20.6 and -3.6 to 33.8), respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 2.1 to 22.9); risk ratio 1.43 (95 % CI 1.07 to 1.92). The Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group; risk difference 18.0 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 1.2 to 34.9); risk ratio 1.36 (95 % CI 1.02 to 1.83). The Moderna trial exhibited a 6 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group: risk difference 7.1 per 10,000 (95 % CI -23.2 to 37.4); risk ratio 1.06 (95 % CI 0.84 to 1.33). Combined, there was a 16 % higher risk of serious adverse events in mRNA vaccine recipients: risk difference 13.2 (95 % CI -3.2 to 29.6); risk ratio 1.16 (95 % CI 0.97 to 1.39)."
Just in case you cannot do the math that is 1 to 1.5 out of a thousand for Moderna and up to 1.8 out of a thousand for Pfizer's vaccine. Not even close to your numbers..