SkepticThinker
Veteran Member
Wrong what?Wrong, the scientific method is not conditional on publication.
I asked what journal I can read his data in? Did he publish it or not? Has it been vetted by other scientists and their work, or not? Are there other studies corroborating his? Where is it? You know, anybody can say whatever they want on Twitter, right?
What kind of scientific training do you have?
Sorry, I'm not interested in Gish Galloping onto to the next thing you've come up with.More than a quarter of people injected with mRNA Covid jabs suffered an unintended immune response created by a glitch in the way the vaccine was read by the body, a study has found.
![]()
One in four who had Pfizer Covid jabs experienced unintended immune response
More than a quarter of people injected with mRNA Covid jabs suffered an unintended immune response created by a glitch in the way the vaccine was read by the body, a study has found.www.yahoo.com
You probably should have read past the first paragraph to the second one, that says:
"No adverse effects were created by the error, data show, but Cambridge scientists found such vaccines were not perfect and sometimes led to nonsense proteins being made instead of the desired Covid “spike”, which mimics infection and leads to antibody production."