Your interpretation of events is not objective science - you have no testable hypothesis that the so-called vaccines were effective, only a few cases for which no significant conclusions can be inferred.
We have quite a bit of data comparing those who got vaccines with those who didn't.
Interestingly, many people said that they weren't going to be guinea pigs for vaccination, but they didn't escape participating in the trials. They served as the control group and had the poorer outcome. Most Covid deaths following the release of the vaccines were in the control group. I'm guessing that you were in the control group. If so, you did well to be alive today. It's your dead cohorts that convince me that getting vaccinated wasn't just the socially correct thing to do, but also the personally best choice.
The only thing you are doing "constantly" is showing how ineffective you are as an apologist for the pharmaceutical industry.
How effective do you think being an apologist for the conspiracy theorists and pseudoscientists has been for you? You don't seem to be changing any minds.
Pfizer's so-called vaccine is neither safe nor effective
Just Pfizer's? It's definitely effective, and so far, safer than being unvaccinated, which is likely to remain the case, as vaccines are not known to have long-term sequelae. Many viruses, however do. The vaccine reduces the frequency of infections, their duration, the viral load, the chances of long Covid, and the chances of hospitalization and death from Covid.
I hope you've never had and never get a Covid infection if you're unvaccinated. You don't want that bugger to settle into your tissues. You want it met with antibodies when it hits the blood stream before it gets to the heart, lungs, brain, and kidneys, where it causes permanent organ disfunction, and may very well cause another disease down the road.
You probably know that shingles is long VZV (varicella-zoster virus) and that AIDS is long HIV (human immunodeficiency virus), but I don't think most people realize that cervical cancer is long HPV (papillomavirus), Multiple Sclerosis is long EBV (Epstein-Barr Virus), Alzheimer's is long HSV (herpes simple virus), and liver cancer is long HCV (hepatitis C virus). It's obviously best to never get that infection, but if you do, to have antibodies ready to limit it already in the blood stream to prevent or minimize deep-seated tissue infection is desirable.
But hey, at least you won't have a reaction to an injection like I did. I had tenderness at the injection site for about three days after (twice), and my wife saw her lymph nodes swell for a few days in the ipsilateral axilla (the armpit on the same side as where the vaccine was delivered) once. We know two somebodies that had much more severe reactions and were in bed for a couple of weeks, but they're both fine now.
the definition of a vaccine was changed, and the Pfizer product doesn't fit the original definition.
You seem to consider that significant. If you've said why somewhere, I missed it.
Remember, the earliest vaccines were for fairly stable viruses and conferred near-perfect immunity to diseases like smallpox and polio, and excellent immunity to diseases like measles, mumps, and rubella. The mRNA vaccines were in the 90% effective range when released, but that quickly fell into the thirties with the advent of the delta and then the omicron variants. But these vaccines still confer valuable even if incomplete immunity.