nnmartin
Well-Known Member
that's a good one.
I say we bring back Old Testament law to have public virginal sacrifices on saturday afternoons. The local supermarket carpark would make a good venue.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Taboo subjects thread
- Thread starter nnmartin
- Start date
that's a good one.
I say we bring back Old Testament law to have public virginal sacrifices on saturday afternoons. The local supermarket carpark would make a good venue.
Just a phase?Bestiality is definitely a sexual orientation. What else would you call it
Kilgore Trout
Misanthropic Humanist
Why do so many women have an overwhelming sexual attraction to Kilgore Trout even though it makes them feel dirty?
Bestiality is definitely a sexual orientation. What else would you call it
A sexual disorientation?
A sexual disorientation?
LOL, that might be it.
LOL! One would hope soJust a phase?
nnmartin
Well-Known Member
It's a depraved sexual perversion the same as incest.
It is also against God's law and anyone who as any decent sense of morality.
It must be your rapier wit and rugged good looks. Really, who could resist?
Gjallarhorn
N'yog-Sothep
God's laws allowed slavery, forcing a woman to marry her rapist, and killing children who talked back to their elders.
Clearly a "decent sense of morality" isn't to be found in "God's law".
Drolefille
PolyPanGeekGirl
Not unless that is someone's primary orientation - as in their preferred partner is an animal, not a human.
And even then, it would be considered disordered due to the other issues involved.
You know, this argument got you nowhere in the relevant thread, why bother?
Perversion is determined by current sexual mores, and if it's against God's law why does God create so many people with this orientation?
See Gjallarhorn's post, above.
nnmartin
Well-Known Member
Do you have any quotes for the woman having to marry her rapist?
If you are talking about God setting the bears on the 42 children (from Kings) then that is acceptable because God was showing his firm but fair authority.
if not - then Biblical quote or reference would be good.
As for slavery - well , in Biblical times the culture was different so that was ok too.
nnmartin
Well-Known Member
well, at the risk of being accused of fixation again I will also respond to this post of yours.
Now on the other thread it is a different story - because the main argument running through the majority of it only has 3 players.
Some fresh viewpoints off other members may shed some value onto the issues of morality.
Well, in the state of New York, you can end up on the registry for telling someone of the opposite sex to "go **** him/herself", so context would be key as to how long or whether one should be on the registry. Say a guy solicits a prostitute(another offense that gets you on that registry
I don't really think that guy should sit on that registry for life. Same with a flasher(unless he habitually flashes children,)
Deut. 22: 28-29
Drolefille
PolyPanGeekGirl
"It's ok because God did it so it must have been ok."
Circular reasoning.
So the culture's different now, therefore stop trying to use biblical mores on a different culture.
Ta da, simple. That's why this argument doesn't work.