• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Tell me why my personal belief is wrong

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
That can be a problem. Not that you are wrong and all that, but some versions of understanding the teaching can and will lead to harm.
There will always be difference in our understanding of the teachings, example I understanding the teaching one way, you a bit different, @Trailblazer has her understanding of the teaching.

That does not mean any of us are wrong, it only means we have not reached the same level of understanding of the teaching.
 

Heyo

Veteran Member
In order make the earth, wouldn't it first be necessary to create the universe? Once the energy is in motion and the laws are in place, the rest - including the earth and it's inhabitants - must follow naturally.
Would you say that a bacteria, 4 billion years ago, created you? For humans to exist, primates had to exist, for primates to exist mammals had to exist, for mammals to exist, chordates had to exist, for chordates to exist multicellular life had to exist, for multicellular life to exist bacteria had to exist. Therefore a bacteria created you.
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
There will always be difference in our understanding of the teachings, example I understanding the teaching one way, you a bit different, @Trailblazer has her understanding of the teaching.

That does not mean any of us are wrong, it only means we have not reached the same level of understanding of the teaching.

Now first a question. If I explain the general problem with relying on an objective source for morality, can you then try to learn from it and not consider it being wrong?
 

mikkel_the_dane

My own religion
Would you say that a bacteria, 4 billion years ago, created you? For humans to exist, primates had to exist, for primates to exist mammals had to exist, for mammals to exist, chordates had to exist, for chordates to exist multicellular life had to exist, for multicellular life to exist bacteria had to exist. Therefore a bacteria created you.

And the universe created the bacteria. But we don't have a correct answer with reason, logic and evidence for all of the universe or even what the universe is.
 

Brian2

Veteran Member
I believe Baha'i teaching do tell the truth.

Yes I know.
I added a bit to the post you just answered. I post it below. It shows how the teachings of Baha'i deny what the Bible tells us about the return of Christ and how it means that Christians who are waiting for the return of Christ and anyone else who wants to see who Baha'u'llah is, should be warned by what the Bible says and not follow after Baha'u'llah.

If Baha'u'llah says he is the return of Christ and the teachings from Jesus and others in the Bible show that he is not the return of Christ then he is lying about who he is or has been deceived, either way, he is a false Christ.
Example, as a Baha'i you will find that you have to deny pretty much everything that is said below.

Acts 1:9 After he said this, he was taken up before their very eyes, and a cloud hid him from their sight.
10 They were looking intently up into the sky as he was going, when suddenly two men dressed in white stood beside them. 11 “Men of Galilee,” they said, “why do you stand here looking into the sky? This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen him go into heaven.”
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
Yes I know.
I added a bit to the post you just answered. I post it below. It shows how the teachings of Baha'i deny what the Bible tells us about the return of Christ and how it means that Christians who are waiting for the return of Christ and anyone else who wants to see who Baha'u'llah is, should be warned by what the Bible says and not follow after Baha'u'llah.

If Baha'u'llah says he is the return of Christ and the teachings from Jesus and others in the Bible show that he is not the return of Christ then he is lying about who he is or has been deceived, either way, he is a false Christ.
Example, as a Baha'i you will find that you have to deny pretty much everything that is said below.

Acts 1:9 After he said this, he was taken up before their very eyes, and a cloud hid him from their sight.
10 They were looking intently up into the sky as he was going, when suddenly two men dressed in white stood beside them. 11 “Men of Galilee,” they said, “why do you stand here looking into the sky? This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen him go into heaven.”
I still have no problem seeing Baha'i teaching as right too.
You believe differently than I do, i do not see a problem with that.
 

Truthseeker

Non-debating member when I can help myself
Because I read the Bible and can see that he fulfills the picture given of a false Christ and not of the return of Christ.
Matthew 24:4 Jesus answered, “See to it that no one deceives you. 5 For many will come in My name, claiming, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will deceive many.
It was said of Christ that He deceives. It has been cited to you in the past the saying by Christ "Ye shall know them by their fruits", but you have concluded that Baha'u'llah has rotten fruits because, and this in my own point of view, He disagrees with your interpretation of the station of Christ among other things. You seem to hold that your interpretation is right, and can't be anything else. We hold that a person claiming to be a Messenger of God should not be decided on a person's understanding of scripture, but on His fruits, which doesn't include whether he interprets scripture by a persons understanding of scripture. The Messenger of God has every right to tell us the true interpretation of scripture. I think also you should realize that a particular historical story, for instance, can be garbled after reported after a number of years. I'm thinking in particular of those demons begging Christ not to cast them out at this moment.

Baha'u'llah didn't claim to be the Christ in my understanding. He was a different individual but manifested the same spiritual qualities.
 

Spirit of Light

Be who ever you want
Out of curiosity, how would you respond to the same question were I to pose it to you?
I would reply.
I do not have a problem with your belief, it is not up to me to say if you believe something that could be wrong, because i do not know or understand enough about your faith.
 

RestlessSoul

Well-Known Member
Well, as honest as I can be. We don't know that about the universe and that includes science and not just religion.

Science in its current version as used by some people assumes that the universe is playing nice and can be explained in positive and coherent terms. That is not a given.


Indeed, it's by no means a given that the universe can be divested of all her secrets; what we have in the Big Bang is a mathematical model apparently confirmed by observations. But the theory is incomplete, and there is no astronomical evidence before the universe was approximately 370,000 years old, nor can there be. Thus the singularity, and period of rapid inflation, are entirely theoretical.

At the fundamental - ie sub atomic - level, comprehension is considerably more elusive, and no consensus exists regarding the ontological implications of a century of discovery; nor even, whether there is an underlying reality to describe at all.

The question the earth asks of heaven in Percy Shelley's Prometheus Unbound, is as yet unanswered, and will probably remain so for some time to come;

"Heav'n, hast thou secrets? Man unveils me, I have none."
 

Truthseeker

Non-debating member when I can help myself
Acts 1:9 After he said this, he was taken up before their very eyes, and a cloud hid him from their sight.
10 They were looking intently up into the sky as he was going, when suddenly two men dressed in white stood beside them. 11 “Men of Galilee,” they said, “why do you stand here looking into the sky? This same Jesus, who has been taken from you into heaven, will come back in the same way you have seen him go into heaven.”
We have a different interpretation, and we don't believe that every historical event is recounted completely accurately, if it comes to that.
 

RestlessSoul

Well-Known Member
Would you say that a bacteria, 4 billion years ago, created you? For humans to exist, primates had to exist, for primates to exist mammals had to exist, for mammals to exist, chordates had to exist, for chordates to exist multicellular life had to exist, for multicellular life to exist bacteria had to exist. Therefore a bacteria created you.


Let's just say bacteria is involved in the web of causality that currently manifests in a phenomenon I call 'me'.
 

KWED

Scratching head, scratching knee
The "evidence" in religious advancement comes from within, by the practitionair get closer to being perfect in words, actions and thoughts. So no the evidence you as a science person looking for are different than a religious person look for evidence of truth
What you are tailing about is not "evidence". It is "belief". Two quite different things, as you have already admitted.
 
Top