• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

That Wacky.....no....Demented United Arab Emirates

Shermana

Heretic
That makes sense now.
Still, even if the change is evidenced, her prosecution for any of those charges seems unwarranted.

No one here is saying the laws themselves or the prosecution itself is warranted. The only thing that I would say would warrant prosecution is making a provable false charge of rape, which happens far more often than some people would like to deny.

As for motive as to why she'd make such a claim....it was her boss (not just a coworker apparently)....
 

Falvlun

Earthbending Lemur
Premium Member
I don't think you quite understand the situation.

The charge of consentual sex applies to anyone who has consentual sex.

She herself reported to them that she had consenstal sex.
She first reported it was rape. That's why she called the police in the first place. Her former boss (is this the person she alleges raped her btw?!?) encouraged her to say it was consensual so that she could just go home. I could see how, being a woman in a decidedly unsupportive and dangerous climate, that would be attractive. When this backfired, she then resumed her claim of rape.

Once again, why do you point out that she reported consensual sex, but omit the fact that she also-- and more often and initially-- reported rape?

To convict her of consensual sex, you must disregard or discount the claim of rape. This is what happened. Do you understand the situation now?

I understand you believe any and all rape accusations should be assumed true until proven otherwise, but that's another story.
Ah yes. That is quite the story.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
No one here is saying the laws themselves or the prosecution itself is warranted. The only thing that I would say would warrant prosecution is making a provable false charge of rape, which happens far more often than some people would like to deny.
As for motive as to why she'd make such a claim....it was her boss (not just a coworker apparently)....
Indeed, a false charge of rape would warrant prosecution. But this doesn't appear to be a false charge. It seems a reluctant change due to pressure & bad counsel.
 

dust1n

Zindīq
Six days later, on March 12, Ms Dalelv returned to the police and retracted the allegation of rape, saying that she had made the initial complaint "because I was under the influence of alcohol".
Exactly why Ms Dalelv decided to change her account is still unclear.

In an interview with CNN, she says she began to suspect that the police did not believe her story after her first interview and was advised by a manager at her company that if she admitted the sex was consensual "it would all go away".

A spokesman for the company, Al Mana Interiors of Qatar, has denied this.

He said the suggestion came in Arabic from a police officer and that its representative acted simply as a translator.

Facts behind the headlines of the Marte Deborah Dalelv Dubai sex case - The National
 

Falvlun

Earthbending Lemur
Premium Member
I agree with your assessment of what most likely happened, i just don't agree that it's clear cut. I do think she was raped, and her account of the reaction of the police sounds authentic to me based on similar cases, but we have also only heard one side of the story and in a not very thorough manner.

So i just don't think it's really that obvious, rather only the seemingly more likely scenario.
I'm cool with that.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Six days later, on March 12, Ms Dalelv returned to the police and retracted the allegation of rape, saying that she had made the initial complaint "because I was under the influence of alcohol".
Exactly why Ms Dalelv decided to change her account is still unclear.

In an interview with CNN, she says she began to suspect that the police did not believe her story after her first interview and was advised by a manager at her company that if she admitted the sex was consensual "it would all go away".

A spokesman for the company, Al Mana Interiors of Qatar, has denied this.

He said the suggestion came in Arabic from a police officer and that its representative acted simply as a translator.

Facts behind the headlines of the Marte Deborah Dalelv Dubai sex case - The National
Complicated it is.
She drank more alcohol than I could.
Bad idea.
 

dust1n

Zindīq
Complicated it is.
She drank more alcohol than I could.
Bad idea.

Sure... but it would be a little silly to think three glasses of vodka, a mojito, and a beer would result in blacking out... all the way to 4 in a half hours later (not counting the time to get back to the hotel), when the incident was known to take place.. Unless, the vodka glass was of enormous size.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Sure... but it would be a little silly to think three glasses of vodka, a mojito, and a beer would result in blacking out... all the way to 4 in a half hours later (not counting the time to get back to the hotel), when the incident was known to take place.. Unless, the vodka glass was of enormous size.
That much booze would wreck me, & I likely close to double her weight.
 

dust1n

Zindīq
That much booze would wreck me, & I likely outweigh her by almost double.

5 drinks would wreck me too, but it wouldn't result in ed hoc blackout... unless maybe I chugged them within thirty minutes or so. That's not to say that such blackouts do not occur at such low amounts of alcohol.
 

Poeticus

| abhyAvartin |
A year in a jail for non-consensual sex is beyond Draconian. I have no idea whether she was raped or not.

Namaste,

No, they said it was jail for consensual sex.

Thus, I stated earlier, watch me go to jail in the future for wearing a wrong set of pants or for brushing my teeth the wrong way or do something trivial that they don't like.

If that made any sense.

M.V.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
5 drinks would wreck me too, but it wouldn't result in ed hoc blackout... unless maybe I chugged them within thirty minutes or so. That's not to say that such blackouts do not occur at such low amounts of alcohol.
Women typically cannot metabolize alcohol as well as men. So if that much would wreck me, it's conceivable that she could lose consciousness from it. But there is no question that she'd be extremely impaired.
 

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
मैत्रावरुणिः;3421505 said:
Namaste,
No, they said it was jail for consensual sex.
Thus, I stated earlier, watch me go to jail in the future for wearing a wrong set of pants or for brushing my teeth the wrong way or do something trivial that they don't like.
If that made any sense.
M.V.
Do you mean that strange & unexpected laws with severe punishment are scary?
 

Shermana

Heretic
She first reported it was rape. That's why she called the police in the first place. Her former boss (is this the person she alleges raped her btw?!?) encouraged her to say it was consensual so that she could just go home. I could see how, being a woman in a decidedly unsupportive and dangerous climate, that would be attractive. When this backfired, she then resumed her claim of rape.

Once again, why do you point out that she reported consensual sex, but omit the fact that she also-- and more often and initially-- reported rape?

To convict her of consensual sex, you must disregard or discount the claim of rape. This is what happened. Do you understand the situation now?


Ah yes. That is quite the story.

Why do you keep insisting that I omitted the fact that she initially reported rape, why do you keep omitting that I said "Changed her story"?

Whether she changed it out of pressure or not, she said she changed it because she "suspected" they did not believe her story. How does that fit in exactly?

She herself said that she initially reported rape "Due to alcohol" being involved. We simply don't know what happened. I'm just reporting what happened as it is, as there seems to be a lot of misrepresenting of what even the Western news reports are saying.
 
Top