Lol, another person who has no answers bashing those who offer answers...
I'm not being dishonest at all.
I gave you answer..I gave you explanations...and nothing I wrote, did I advocate that “something from nothing”, but you keep claiming that’s my answers. Hence, the repeating strawman, and you keep attacking what I didn’t say.
Like I said he just gave point A to point B theory. That's not what I asked.
That because in sciences, with every discoveries and with every understanding of that discoveries, what scientists have learned over the centuries, have been very small and incremental.
There are no scientific field, where you would have ALL THE ANSWERS in a single instance, whether it be in science fields or in the technology and engineering worlds.
Every single knowledge in Natural Sciences and Physical Sciences, today, are based on building each theories, upon past theories and past understanding. So it is understandable that my replies to you go from point A to B, etc.
But we don't just build theories upon past theories (eg through additional understanding, but also modifying and updating, where evidence support such changes and corrections), science also remove theories that's not only outdated, but have been tested to be wrong.
About 270 years ago, they have only started tapping into explain what electricity is (eg Benjamin Franklin), but his explanation and experiment, didn't include understanding of electric and magnetic fields, nor did anyone in this time, knew anything about electrons and the roles electrons play not only electricity, but also EM fields as well as in molecular structure of matters and chemical reactions.
Around this time, they still thought of atoms being the smallest units that make up matters. They didn't know anything about the nuclei, the hadron particles, eg protons and neutrons, and other subatomic particles, quarks, neutrinos, photons and other force-carrier particles.
The understanding of atoms and their composition took time, a long time, and they are still learning something new.
With the advent of Quantum Mechanics, it revolutionary the ways we think. Throughout it all, QM is involved breaking everything down to their small discrete particles. Then it was explained that particles aren't elementary, but everything in the universe, including particles are made of (quantum) fields, hence the Quantum Field Theory (QFT).
Then in 1919, Edwin Hubble discovered with a more powerful telescope - the Hooker Telescope, the largest constructed around that time - discovered that the Milky Way is not the only galaxy in the universe, there were more galaxies, some of which, like Andromeda and Triangulum, were misidentified as nebula during the 18th century.
It was more than just correction of some misidentified objects, the universe is even larger than what Hubble could observe, because apparently the Hooker Telescope isn't powerful to observe more of the universe.
But this discovery did a lot more than just discovering how small the Milky Way is, it revolutionized our understanding of not only astronomy, but also in astrophysics and physical cosmology.
A few years later after Hubble's discovery, Alexander Friedmann (1922), Howard Percy Robertson (1924-25) and Georges Lemaitre (1927), were the earliest pioneer for expanding universe model (which was later known as the Big Bang model, starting in 1949). All 3 physicists used Albert Einstein's field equations from General Relativity as framework, to work backwards on how the universe formed, including the formation of stars and galaxies. Then in 1948, George Gamow (former student of Friedmann), Ralph Alpher & Robert Herman teamed up, and built upon the 1920s' expanding universe model, predicting two vital concept the Big Bang Nucleosynthesis (BBN, or the Primordial Nucleosynthesis) and the Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation (CMBR).
What does all this Big Bang cosmology, have to do with atoms and smaller particles (Standard Model of Particle Physics, Fundamental Forces, and Quantum Mechanics)?
If you want to understand how do stars, planets, life and matters form, then with some understanding of Standard Model and Quantum Mechanics?
This is where all matters formed, as well as smaller particles. Both BBN and CMBR explain the origin of matters, especially the lightest elements (hydrogen being the most abundant, as well as helium and lithium) which was most of the universe were made of, after Recombination Epoch and CMBR.
Everything we have learned in the last 120 years, with QM & GR, plus Standard Model (particle physics) and more recently the study of fields, Quantum Field Theory (QFT) - all of these require going from point A to B, etc.
But what does religions have to offer, especially Genesis creation, and the pseudoscience Intelligent Design?
Neither offered any logical and testable explanation: and the backward "God did it" and even stupider the life/world/universe being designed requiring a Designer. Both of these are based on ignorance and archaic superstitious beliefs in the supernatural.
You keep saying that sciences have no facts, you keep asking for everyone "to prove it", and yet what have you done?
You have offered less than zero explanation, and you have never demonstrate your belief in the Creator or the Designer, and you haven't proven a thing.
When I had asked you prove what you have claims, you flat out told me, you don't have to prove anything.
What evidence or proof have you given about Creator or Designer?
None. Your claims are backward and illogical. You cannot test or demonstrate the existence of Creator or Designer, and you cannot logically prove either.
Perhaps, I will take you more seriously if "you prove it".
