I'm not sure any of those examples are the equivalent of the church's suppression of natural expressions of human sexuality. They're opinions, and in general nobody feels guilty about prioritizing their own political opinions over somebody else's.
To you, they're opinions - to some adherents of some groups, they are moral standards which are mandated to them by the group and/or leaders - and they feel guilty if they don't adhere to those standards, or they are booted from the group - or both.
There's no "rule" that you have to do any of these things. One might choose to, but there's no "rule" about it.
There's no rule to YOU - but many groups do have such rules, standards, expectations, etc. To many of their adherents, these standards and expectations ARE rules. My point is that many people follow the standards and mandates of groups and societies and leaders whether they are religious in nature or not - and I just don't think you can speak for anyone but yourself as to whether or not people feel guilt or even condemnation from leaders or groups that aren't inherently religious.
Besides which, I'm not a dog or a child. I don't feel guilt for breaking the "rules" of some random authority figure. When I feel guilt, it's only ever because something I've done has hurt me or someone else.
Great!
By the way, one doesn't have to be a dog or a child to feel guilty, as you yourself state (you feel guilty sometimes too, by your own admission). I'm sure there are people all over the world who are dysfunctional, emotionally unhealthy, or scarred by life's experiences, or brainwashed, or insecure, or whatever, who feel unreasonable guilt about unreasonable things. But don't assume that when a religious person feels guilty, they're feeling guilty because they're "breaking the rules of some random authority figure." Many religious people feel guilt at times for very valid reasons.