• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Creationist's Argument and its Greatest Weakness

Looncall

Well-Known Member
Oh yes, of course, I forgot, ad homs and mockery and insulting people of pure faith is public service. I've never scammed anyone or asked for anyone's money to further the gospel.

PGA!

Of course organized religions are scams. They peddle stuff they cannot demonstrate that they can provide (eg afterlives). Opposing them is indeed public service.

Run oif the mill believers are just victims. Their only fault is gullibility.
 

ecco

Veteran Member
You misunderstand my claim. Atheists who post 25 attacks daily on believers are backslidden Christians (and maybe not even atheists) and/or completely closed minded.

The proof is in the posts!

Whew! I'm glad I don't "post 25 attacks daily on believers ". I sure wouldn't want to be categorized as a "closed minded backslidden Christian ".
 
Last edited:

ecco

Veteran Member
And sometimes money-seeking from a church or ministry is appropriate, sometimes inappropriate. If your standard is perfection, you agree with God that imperfect and perfect people will be sorted into two different locations after death. Good work!
My standard?
 

ecco

Veteran Member
I have concluded that, yes. But I would say that claims of a physical creature known as Minnie Mouse are slightly different than claims about invisible, non-physical universe creators.

I guess to be more clear, when it comes to god(s) I don't believe any exist and I go about my life as if they don't. But, I am aware that we don't know everything there is to know about the universe and how it came to be, so I leave open the slight possibility that some god(s) may be out there in some capacity. Do I think it's the God that Christians or Muslims or Jews, etc. describe? Not really.

You can know that a physical creature known as Minnie Mouse is nothing more than the creation of man's imaginings. But you can't quite bring yourself to come to the same conclusion about "GOD". This, despite your knowing that all "gods" are equally the creations of man's imaginings.

Man's creations are man's creations - nothing more, nothing less.




ETA: Perhaps you need to read and understand what you wrote in the second sentence of your post #936
 

Skywalker

Well-Known Member
is that it tries to prove its validity by throwing darts at evolution . . . . Oops. Excuse me, "Darwinism." This isn't to say its underlying basis, faith in an ancient book, isn't enough to sink it forthwith, but this little aspect of their argument is assiduously avoided at all costs. Why? Because it lacks the power to convince. So, time and again those who champion evolution are subjected to chest-beating challenges such as, "You weren't there so you can't know," or "If we evolved from apes/monkeys, why are there still apes/monkeys today?" or "abiogenesis is an unproven theory," or my favorite "when you can show me a (name your animal) giving birth to a (name another animal) I'll believe in evolution." Of course, few of us care if the creationist believe us or not--- evolutionists are mainly concerned with their attempt to insinuate creationism into public schools, and, secondarily, with their attempt to pass along misinformation to the unwary.

In short then, the creationist ploy is one of, "I can't prove my side so I'll give it credibility by tearing down evolution," which (1) is hardly a compliment to the intelligence of its audience, (2) falsely assumes that if evolution is wrong, by default creationism must be true.

I know the forgoing is nothing new to most of those who visit the Evolution Vs. Creationism Forum, but I think it needs mentioning now and then to remind the evolutionist of the creationist's pitiful tactics and how futile arguing with them will likely be---entertaining as it may be. ;)


If any creationist disputes my characterization here and finds it offensive I apologize and invite them to post a reasonable response.
Is There a God?
1. The complexity of our planet points to a deliberate Designer who not only created our universe, but sustains it today.
Many examples showing God's design could be given, possibly with no end. But here are a few:

The Earth...its size is perfect. The Earth's size and corresponding gravity holds a thin layer of mostly nitrogen and oxygen gases, only extending about 50 miles above the Earth's surface. If Earth were smaller, an atmosphere would be impossible, like the planet Mercury. If Earth were larger, its atmosphere would contain free hydrogen, like Jupiter.3 Earth is the only known planet equipped with an atmosphere of the right mixture of gases to sustain plant, animal and human life.

atheist2.jpg
The Earth is located the right distance from the sun. Consider the temperature swings we encounter, roughly -30 degrees to +120 degrees. If the Earth were any further away from the sun, we would all freeze. Any closer and we would burn up. Even a fractional variance in the Earth's position to the sun would make life on Earth impossible. The Earth remains this perfect distance from the sun while it rotates around the sun at a speed of nearly 67,000 mph. It is also rotating on its axis, allowing the entire surface of the Earth to be properly warmed and cooled every day.

And our moon is the perfect size and distance from the Earth for its gravitational pull. The moon creates important ocean tides and movement so ocean waters do not stagnate, and yet our massive oceans are restrained from spilling over across the continents.4

Water...colorless, odorless and without taste, and yet no living thing can survive without it. Plants, animals and human beings consist mostly of water (about two-thirds of the human body is water). You'll see why the characteristics of water are uniquely suited to life:
 

ecco

Veteran Member
RE:
"The complexity of our planet points to a deliberate Designer"

Is this something you wrote? I ask because I don't think it is, but if you just copied and pasted you sould have shown from-whom / from-where you copied it. To not do so is plagiarism.

Nevertheless...
Is There A God? 1. The complexity of our planet points to a deliberate Designer who not only created our universe, but sustains it today.
The Earth…its size is perfect. The Earth’s size and corresponding gravity holds a thin layer of mostly nitrogen and oxygen gases, only extending about 50 miles above the Earth’s surface. If Earth were smaller, an atmosphere would be impossible, like the planet Mercury. If Earth were larger, its atmosphere would contain free hydrogen, like Jupiter. Earth is the only known planet equipped with an atmosphere of the right mixture of gases to sustain plant, animal and human life.
...is typical of the creationists nonsensical attempts to "prove a point" by conflating cause and effect.

It's true that if the earth were smaller like Mercury or larger like Jupiter, we wouldn't be here.

There are billions of planets in our galaxy that are not hospitable to life. Conservatively, there are millions of planets in our galaxy that are hospitable to life. Right now there is probably someone on one of those planets writing on a forum thanking God for making a perfect planet just for him and his fellow individuals.

Our galaxy is not special. Our solar system is not special. Our earth is not special. You and you god are not special.
 

Skwim

Veteran Member
RE:
"The complexity of our planet points to a deliberate Designer"

Is this something you wrote? I ask because I don't think it is, but if you just copied and pasted you sould have shown from-whom / from-where you copied it. To not do so is plagiarism.
It was lifted from a piece by Marilyn Adamson HERE


.
 
Last edited:

ecco

Veteran Member
It was lifted from a piece by Marilyn Adamson HERE
.
I know it was lifted. I googled "Does God exist? The complexity of our planet points to a deliberate Designer who not only created our universe" and got multiple hits.

Is there a God?

...and here...

God Does Exist


Both places cite it with no reference to Adamson. I guess plagiarism is acceptable in the Creationist world as long as it's for the good of God.
 
is that it tries to prove its validity by throwing darts at evolution . . . . Oops. Excuse me, "Darwinism." This isn't to say its underlying basis, faith in an ancient book, isn't enough to sink it forthwith, but this little aspect of their argument is assiduously avoided at all costs. Why? Because it lacks the power to convince. So, time and again those who champion evolution are subjected to chest-beating challenges such as, "You weren't there so you can't know," or "If we evolved from apes/monkeys, why are there still apes/monkeys today?" or "abiogenesis is an unproven theory," or my favorite "when you can show me a (name your animal) giving birth to a (name another animal) I'll believe in evolution." Of course, few of us care if the creationist believe us or not--- evolutionists are mainly concerned with their attempt to insinuate creationism into public schools, and, secondarily, with their attempt to pass along misinformation to the unwary.

In short then, the creationist ploy is one of, "I can't prove my side so I'll give it credibility by tearing down evolution," which (1) is hardly a compliment to the intelligence of its audience, (2) falsely assumes that if evolution is wrong, by default creationism must be true.

I know the forgoing is nothing new to most of those who visit the Evolution Vs. Creationism Forum, but I think it needs mentioning now and then to remind the evolutionist of the creationist's pitiful tactics and how futile arguing with them will likely be---entertaining as it may be. ;)


If any creationist disputes my characterization here and finds it offensive I apologize and invite them to post a reasonable response.

Genius de-evolution with smart design (looking like isolated adaption)(you break down from everything to be something always)
 

BilliardsBall

Veteran Member
Nobody has said anything to you to remotely compare with or
justify the venom you spew.

What is wrong with you?

If I believed in "Satan" I'd think you are a shill,
on a mission to discredit and bring shame to
Christianity.

Gosh, Audie, if I wasn't so "pleasantly" greeted by often, five or six posts from you, assaulting my positions, even on conversations you weren't a part of, I'd believe better about you.
 

BilliardsBall

Veteran Member
Of course organized religions are scams. They peddle stuff they cannot demonstrate that they can provide (eg afterlives). Opposing them is indeed public service.

Run oif the mill believers are just victims. Their only fault is gullibility.

But, of course, it's not a scam to give time/money/effort to something unprovable that isn't religious, like proving a universal negative. Right?
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
You can know that a physical creature known as Minnie Mouse is nothing more than the creation of man's imaginings. But you can't quite bring yourself to come to the same conclusion about "GOD". This, despite your knowing that all "gods" are equally the creations of man's imaginings.

Man's creations are man's creations - nothing more, nothing less.

ETA: Perhaps you need to read and understand what you wrote in the second sentence of your post #936
Apparently I did not finish my thought for some reason. I should have also said that when it comes to the existence of invisible undetectable deities, I suppose they could exist, but unless their existence is demonstrable in some way, I don't think it can be known whether they actually exist or not. So some god thing could be out there, but we could have no way of knowing it.God could be the universe or some other thing humans haven't thought up or can't wrap their minds around. But, I go about my life as if there are no gods in the same way I go about my life as if there is no actual Minnie Mouse.
 

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Gosh, Audie, if I wasn't so "pleasantly" greeted by often, five or six posts from you, assaulting my positions, even on conversations you weren't a part of, I'd believe better about you.
Positions are often "assaulted" in debate forums. Maybe they're not the place for you if it's too much for you to have to defend your position.:shrug:
 

Audie

Veteran Member
Gosh, Audie, if I wasn't so "pleasantly" greeted by often, five or six posts from you, assaulting my positions, even on conversations you weren't a part of, I'd believe better about you.

Yep, never a fly on you, always put anything you
do off on other people.
 

Looncall

Well-Known Member
But, of course, it's not a scam to give time/money/effort to something unprovable that isn't religious, like proving a universal negative. Right?

Proving a universal negative isn't necessary when the positive claims aren't substantiated.

It's not a scam to oppose frauds whose claims are unsupported. Especially when those frauds cause egregious harms.

Ever heard of snake oil?
 

BilliardsBall

Veteran Member
Positions are often "assaulted" in debate forums. Maybe they're not the place for you if it's too much for you to have to defend your position.:shrug:

Again, atheists attack sound Christian posts of mine like flies on trash, because IMHO their master is the Lord of the Flies.

PGA.
 
Top