• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The dark side of gender change for minors. Chloe Cole sues doctors and blames Biden.

Sgt. Pepper

All you need is love.
Where are her parents or her legal guardians? Why isn't she holding her parents or her legal guardians responsible for allowing her to have the gender change? Surely she has adults in her life who were legally responsible for her and her medical care when she was a minor. I don't know anything about the law concerning a subject like this, but aren't the parents legally responsible for their child?
 

Subduction Zone

Veteran Member
Where are her parents or her legal guardians? Why isn't she holding her parents or her legal guardians responsible for allowing her to have the gender change? Surely she has adults in her life who were legally responsible for her and her medical care when she was a minor. I don't know anything about the law concerning a subject like this, but aren't the parents legally responsible for their child?
They probably do not have any money. Lawyers always go after those with deep pockets.
 

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Where are her parents or her legal guardians? Why isn't she holding her parents or her legal guardians responsible for allowing her to have the gender change? Surely she has adults in her life who were legally responsible for her and her medical care when she was a minor. I don't know anything about the law concerning a subject like this, but aren't the parents legally responsible for their child?

Speaking of parents, we know that some are capable of pretty heinous things. Imagine if some psycho mother pressured and manipulated her son into transitioning because she wanted a daughter.
 

The Kilted Heathen

Crow FreyjasmaðR
Something to consider.
No, not something to consider. These are always so full of **** (mod edit), and remarkably still none of your (or anyone else's) business.

The New York Post is about as reliable as Fox News, and is owned by the same arsehole. It is exceptionally biased to Conservative talking points, and does not resemble fact. You might as well reference the National Inquirer. And what's more, searching for Chloe Cole shows up nothing but Right Wing news outlets. So color me very damn skeptical.

But let's say it's legit, and is something much more insidious than an individual's regret. What's your point? Chole isn't the whole LGBT+, neither are her views and regrets universal.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Revoltingest

Pragmatic Libertarian
Premium Member
Sometimes things don't turn out as expected.
This points to the need for due diligence by
both patients & doctors before proceeding with
transition. Of course, this case doesn't mean
transition is wrong for all. Just like having a
brain tumor removed...it's usually successful.
But sometimes the patient dies. And yet, we
don't have government banning the procedure.
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
But let's say it's legit, and is something much more insidious than an individual's regret. What's your point? Chole isn't the whole LGBT+, neither are her views and regrets universal.
That exactly. They are trying to hyper focus on one case out of many.
But the reality is NO medical treatment or procedure comes without risks. But science requires large samples and trends so we know this risk is low, the regrets are few.
It used to be the standards were too rigid (you had to take a pink color job and be sexually attracted to men), and that didn't work. There was a time when the standards were too lose, and that was such a disaster that the Standards of Care were established and treatment results began to improve once people could be filtered out but while also allowed to be themselves (such as working with computers instead of kids), and the number of regrets and failed transitions went down.
 

Ella S.

Well-Known Member
It's interesting that if you have sex with a minor it's bad but if you mutilate their sexual organs it's good.

We live in a sick society.

Would you call removing inflamed tonsils "mutilating children's throats?"

Would you call performing cosmetic surgery on the faces of young burn victims "mutilating children's faces?"

Would you call dentistry "mutilating children's mouths?"
 
Last edited:

cladking

Well-Known Member
Would you call removing inflamed tonsils "mutilating children's throats?"

When it's done because it's all the rage such as in the '50's it is borderline but it's never intentional destruction of a child's choices in adulthood.

Would you call performing cosmetic surgery on the faces of young burn victims "mutilating children's faces?"

No. I would call that reconstructive surgery. It might even enable a young boy to have a child some day.

Would you call dentistry "mutilating children's mouths?"

Incredible.

We might be even sicker than I imagined. How can surgery and life saving medical procedures be compared to the sexual mutilation of children?
 
Top