Bunyip
pro scapegoat
LOL Nope. If you are not theist, you are a-theist.
Pretty simple,
If you are not 'A', you are a'A'.
-
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:- Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
- Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
- Access to private conversations with other members.
We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
The default position...
- Thread starter Deathbydefault
- Start date
- Status
Pretty simple,
If you are not 'A', you are a'A'.
Ignorance is absence of knowledge.
Like it's impossible to not have a car unless you know about cars?
You're either A or not A.
No, it's just absence of things. Knowledge requires truth, but we can be ignorant of false things, too.
What car?
Not if Aristotle has anything to say about it.
His wording was that either A is true or not A is true. He was able to take a step back from A and look at it, as opposed to investing himself in being it.
That's what I said. No third option.
The third option is to step away from assessing a thing's truth.
Either it's true or it's not. No third option.
Fine. I disagree (that we will ever see face to face).
You keep stepping into the picture.
Edit: Truth informs the picture: when it's a picture of truth, it becomes recursive.
You either have to look at things objectively or not. That's truth.
Why did you bring up Aristotle if you disagree when he says there are two options?
I don't disagree with him, at all. I think he was masterful at analysis.
He said nothing about options, just about variables.
You are so confused I give up. See you later.
Yet I'm not confused, at all.
Truth has only two options. Truth isn't things. The variable A is a thing. It's informed by truth, but it isn't truth.
Truth also informs the state of looking at truth as a variable A. We can look, or we can look away.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Oh please.....and who do you think you are posting to?.......God?
Curious George
Veteran Member
Yes, but you are not dead, are you.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Well, if you insist that some portion of me is God.....
I might thank you to refrain.
Sooner or later, I will stand before God and heaven and someone could say of me....
He allowed himself to be called 'God' before his fellow man.
God and heaven might not take it lightly.
and it seems Someone Else had that same line drawn against Him in this world.
It got Him in trouble....and crucified.
Curious George
Veteran Member
No, I am saying your construction of God is part of you, not the other way around.
Thief
Rogue Theologian
Curious George
Veteran Member
And that is where we disagree.
You cannot have a thought you did not create, otherwise there is no you.
- Status