Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Just because you say it does not make it true. Survival dictates it can't be true.
I don't even believe in "true".Just because you say it does not make it true. Survival dictates it can't be true.
If Badran (staff guy) is correct, then US usage would prevail.A lot of people, especially in the US, have a hard time differentiating between voluntary socialism, which is what libertarian socialists advocate, and the state socialism as seen in the USSR and China.
We're few in number, but feisty on the rare occasions we assemble.Hey, this is the most traffic this section has seen in awhile.
A lot of people, especially in the US, have a hard time differentiating between voluntary socialism, which is what libertarian socialists advocate, and the state socialism as seen in the USSR and China.
I don't even believe in "true".
But I do argue based upon commonly accepted definitions.
Does "survival" necessitate the prohibition of an employer
& a worker voluntarily bargaining their relationship?
I don't even believe in "true".
But I do argue based upon commonly accepted definitions.
Does "survival" necessitate the prohibition of an employer
& a worker voluntarily bargaining their relationship?
Hey, this is the most traffic this section has seen in awhile.
I never scare anyone.Rev scared me off before by refusing to believe there is any such thing as libertarian socialism. The new definitions emboldened me to return.
People would freely associate to create what was needed and capable of creating, those people would freely associate with other groups
BTW I feel forced into my associates.
I never scare anyone.
But some people can become frightened.
Rev ignored this
The labels given to the different fields and axes on the compass are based on long-standing European and Commonwealth terminology, which can be different from those used in the politics of the United States[citation needed].
The Politicalcompass.org website does not reveal the people behind it, beyond the fact that it seems to be based in the UK.[5][6] According to the New York Times, the site is the work of Wayne Brittenden, a political journalist.[2] According to Tom Utley, writing in the Daily Telegraph, the site is connected to One World Action, a charity founded by Glenys Kinnock, and to Kinnock herself.[7] An early version of the site was published on One World Action's web server.[8]
Not quite....my plate is full, & you are dessert.Rev ignored this
I can't help how you feel, except to say that you should examine allBTW I feel forced into my associates.
This is another example of your dishonesty, since I've openly advocatedYeah, he ignored all my posts to the same effect as well. It's hard work pretending there's no such thing as anarchosocialism.
It seems you use a different definition of "free".When some one other then you controlls production, food and land. Nothing about your association is free.
It seems you use a different definition of "free".
.
Did you like how I called you "dessert"?I agree, that seems to be the disconnect.
It's about your liberty to start a company, work for whom you want, hire
whom you want, worship any god/pasta you want, marry whomever you
want...