• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

The Donald Trump Rape Trial is underway.

Callisto

Hellenismos, BTW
Have you forgotten that people change over time? What we once feared, we don't always fear today. What we once cared so passionately about may mean little today, while what we never used to even think about may today take on much more importance.
IIRC, she said her mother had recently passed and, as is often the case, she began contemplating life and choices made which led to her decision to not let this continue to go unanswered.
 

Callisto

Hellenismos, BTW
I'd expect a poster to understand that whenever man can have all the women in the world...and whenever women practically throw themselves at him...
well...such stories don't have a high degree of credibility.
I didn't say it's impossible. I am speaking in terms of likelihood.

It's like I said Leonardo Di Caprio raped me. How credible is that? In terms of degrees of likelihood?
Which man, Di Caption or Trump
Considering that the University had to compensate three gentlemen, unjustly accused of something untrue...well I guess the prosecutor really made a blunder.
What does that have to do with this case or it being high profile? Nothing.

There are millions of other cases that are legitimate and where the guilty walk.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
What does that have to do with this case or it being high profile? Nothing.

There are millions of other cases that are legitimate and where the guilty walk.
Because you said prosecutors don't promote a criminal lawsuit, unless there is evidence.
I showed you ...not always.
 

Callisto

Hellenismos, BTW
Because you said prosecutors don't promote a criminal lawsuit, unless there is evidence.
I showed you ...not always.
I said they're not in the business of bringing frivolous cases; and the prosecutor in the Duke case dropped the charges.

Not all cases are won despite actual evidence. You'd have a point if you provided evidence that prosecutors most commonly file spurious cases. This, however, amounts to cherry picking.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
I said they're not in the business of bringing frivolous cases; and the prosecutor in the Duke case dropped the charges.

Not all cases are won despite actual evidence. You'd have a point if you provided evidence that prosecutors most commonly file spurious cases. This, however, amounts to cherry picking.
Because it was a case based upon an unsubstantiated claim. The term frivolous is not a juridical term.
The right word is unsubstantiated.

What makes you think this case is different?
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
1991, Look Of The Year contest - I bet he did too. :oops:

1991-contestant-Look-Of-The-Year-5364.jpg


 

Callisto

Hellenismos, BTW
Because it was a case based upon an unsubstantiated claim. The term frivolous is not a juridical term.
The right word is unsubstantiated.
Frivolous Litigation
Frivolous Claims - Cornell Law School
Frivolous Lawsuits and Vexatious Litigants - NH Law Library
Remedies for Frivolous Lawsuits - Connecticut General Assembly

Trump fined nearly $1 million for frivolous lawsuit against Clinton
Trump rushes to withdraw frivolous lawsuit against NY AG after a stark warning from judge
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Thank you so much.
I didn't know that term because I studied law in Europe and in my country the so called frivolous claims are unthinkable.

Since that, jurists (attorneys, procurators, prosecutors) that willingly engage in frivolous claims, will be immediately jailed for obstruction to justice.
And they will be forced to compensate both the victims and the State, with a mulct.
We take the judicial system very very seriously, over here. We don't enable clowns to get away with it.
And by clowns I mean jurists who use the judicial system as a tool to nurture their personal revenges or antipathies.
 
Last edited:

ImmortalFlame

Woke gremlin
I didn't know that term because I studied law in Europe and in my country the so called frivolous claims are unthinkable.
Sorry to have to cut in on the claims of someone I am ignoring, but this isn't true.

SLAPP suits are serious problem in Italy, such that multiple press freedom organisations have criticised the Italian government - and other powerful agencies and individuals - use of SLAPP suits to silence public criticism and unfavourable journalism.


If Estro had truly studied law in Italy, she would know about this.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
1991, Look Of The Year contest - I bet he did too. :oops:

View attachment 75908


Well...with all those women throwing themselves at him...
(a man that will never have to ask)...

such story seems unlikely to me, in terms of degrees of likelihood. I didn't say impossible. I said unlikely.
 

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
Well...with all those women throwing themselves at him...
(a man that will never have to ask)...

such story seems unlikely to me, in terms of degrees of likelihood. I didn't say impossible. I said unlikely.
Well, if you read the article, some of the contestants were only 14. Not that I am implying anything. :eek:
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
I'd expect a poster to understand that whenever a man can have all the women in the world...and whenever women practically throw themselves at him...
well...such stories don't have a high degree of credibility.
I didn't say it's impossible. I am speaking in terms of likelihood.

It's like I said Leonardo Di Caprio raped me. How credible is that? In terms of degrees of likelihood?
Are you suggesting that rich and powerful men are less likely to commit sexual assault? Because recent data does not bare that out, quite the contrary. It is practically a cliche. It seems like every man with power abuses that power to rape or sexually assualt some women (or man).
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Are you suggesting that rich and powerful men are less likely to commit sexual assault? Because recent data does not bare that out, quite the contrary. It is practically a cliche. It seems like every man with power abuses that power to rape or sexually assualt some women (or man).
Well...
would you believe me if I told you Leonardo Di Caprio raped me?
There are so many things to take into account.
 

fantome profane

Anti-Woke = Anti-Justice
Premium Member
Well...
would you believe me if I told you Leonardo Di Caprio raped me?
There are so many things to take into account.
I can't answer that question. But my point is that the idea of a famous, rich, good looking celebrity committing sexual assault is very believable.
 
Last edited:

Father Heathen

Veteran Member
Well...
would you believe me if I told you Leonardo Di Caprio raped me?
There are so many things to take into account.
It's called evidence and plausibility. Trump, one of Epstein's besties, has a long history of sexual misconduct (see link in previous post.)

You're letting your weird infatuation with the creepy little goblin cloud your judgement.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
I can't answer that question. But my point is that the idea of a famous, rich, good looking celebrity committing sexual assault is very believable.
Considering that all women are crazy for Leonardo...
and that so many women (including me) would do anything to pass just one night with him,...

I guess I would not be that credible.
 
Top